The concept of “wicked problems” has attracted increasing focus in policy research, but the implications for public organizations have received less attention. This article examines the main organizational and cognitive dimensions emerging from the research literature on wicked problems. We identify several recent approaches to addressing problem complexity and stakeholder divergence based on the literatures on systems thinking, collaboration and coordination, and the adaptive leadership roles of public leaders and managers. We raise some challenges for public management in some key functional areas of government—strategy making, organizational design, people management, and performance measurement. We argue that provisional solutions can be developed, despite the difficulties of reforming governance processes to address wicked problems more effectively.
AckoffR. L. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York, NY: Wiley.
2.
AgranoffR. (2007). Managing within networks: Adding value to public organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
4.
AlfordJ. (1998). Corporate management. In SchafritzJ. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 538-539). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.
AlfordJ.O’FlynnJ. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
AllenG. M.GouldE. M. (1986). Complexity, wickedness and public forests. Journal of Forestry, 84, 20-24.
7.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
8.
Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra, Australia: APSC.
9.
AxelrodR. (1976). Structure of decision. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
10.
BardachE. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
BentleyT.WilsdonJ. (Eds.). (2003). The adaptive state. London, UK: Demos.
12.
BentrupG. (2001). Evaluation of a collaborative model. Environmental Management, 27, 739-748.
13.
BerkesF.ColdingJ.FolkeC. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BerkhoutF.LeachM.ScoonesI. (Eds.). (2003). Negotiating environmental change: New perspectives from social science. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
15.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547-558.
16.
BlackmanT.ElliottE.GreeneA.HarringtonB.HunterD.MarksL.McKeeL.WilliamsG. (2006). Performance assessment and wicked problems: The case of health inequalities. Public Policy and Administration, 21(2), 66-80.
17.
BostonJ.MartinJ.PallotJ.WalshP. (1996). Public management: The New Zealand model. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
BrysonJ. M.AckermannF.EdenC.FinnC. (2004). Visible thinking: Unlocking causal mapping for practical business results. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
19.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.
20.
CamillusJ. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review, 86, 99-106.
21.
CampbellM. C. (2003). Intractability in environmental disputes: Exploring a complex construct. Journal of Planning Literature, 17, 360-371.
22.
CarterN.KleinR.DayP. (1992). How organizations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. London, UK: Routledge.
23.
ChapmanJ. (2004). System failure: Why governments must learn to think differently (2nd ed.). London, UK: Demos.
24.
ChrislipD.LarsonC. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
ChristensenK. S. (1985). Coping with uncertainty in planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 51, 63-73.
26.
ChristensenK. S. (1999). Cities and complexity: Making intergovernmental decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
ChurchmanC. W. (1967). Free for all. Management Science, 14, B141-B142.
28.
ConklinJ. (2006). Wicked problems and social complexity. In ConklinJ. (Ed.), Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems (pp. 3-40). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
29.
ConklinJ. (2007). Rethinking wicked problems [interview]. NextD Journal, 10, 1-30. Available from http://nextd.org
30.
CrosbyB. C.BrysonJ. M. (2005). Leadership for the common good (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
CurrieG.LockettA. (2007). A critique of transformational leadership: Moral, professional and contingent dimensions of leadership within public services organizations. Human Relations, 60, 341-370.
32.
deHoogR. (1990). Competition, negotiation or co-operation: Three models for service contracting. Administration & Society, 22, 317-340.
33.
DobuzinskisL.HowlettM.LaycockD. (Eds.). (2007). Policy analysis in Canada: The state of the art. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
34.
FeldmanM.KhademianA. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20, 305-324.
35.
FischerF. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26, 163-187.
36.
ForesterJ. (1999). Dealing with deep value differences. In SusskindL.McKearnanS.Thomas-LarmerJ. (Eds.), The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement (pp. 463-493). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
FredericksonD. G.FredericksonH. G. (2006). Measuring the performance of the hollow state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38.
FreemanD. M. (2000). Wicked water problems: Sociology and local water organizations in addressing water resources policy. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 483-491.
39.
GeyerR.RihaniS. (2010). Complexity and public policy. London, UK: Routledge.
40.
GloubermanS.ZimmermanB. (2002). Complicated and complex systems: What would successful reform of Medicare look like? (Discussion Paper No. 8). Ottawa, Ontario: Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada.
41.
GoldsmithS.EggersW. D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
42.
GoldsmithS.KettlD. (Eds.). (2009). Unlocking the power of networks: Keys to high performance government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
43.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
GuntonT.DayJ. C. (2003). The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management. Environments, 31, 5-19.
JonesB. D. (1999). Bounded rationality. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 297-321.
60.
KarreP.van TwistM.AlfordJ.van der SteenM. (2012). Whole of government in theory and practice: An exploratory account of how Australian and Dutch governments deal with wicked problems in an integrated way. In BekkersV.FengerM. (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation and interconnectivity: Public governance and the search for connective capacity (pp. 97-113). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ISO Press.
61.
KeastR.MandellM.BrownK.WoolcockG. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64, 363-371.
62.
KepkayM. (2002). Implementing adaptive forest management: The challenge of a wicked human environment (Clayoquot Alliance Working Paper). Victoria, BC. Retrieved from http://www.clayoquotalliance.uvic.ca
63.
KettlD. (2009). The next government of the United States: Why our institutions fail us and how to fix them. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
64.
KickertW.KlijnE. H.KoppenjanJ. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London, UK: Sage.
65.
KielL. D. (1994). Managing chaos and complexity in government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
66.
KingdonJ. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.
67.
KoppenjanJ.KlijnE. H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. London, UK: Routledge.
68.
KotterJ. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York, NY: Free Press.
69.
KotterJ. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
70.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
KreuterM.De RosaC.HowzeE.BaldwinG. (2004). Understanding wicked problems: A key to advancing environmental health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 441-454.
72.
LaskerR. D.WeissE. S. (2003). Broadening participation in community problem-solving. Journal of Urban Health, 80, 14-46.
73.
LazarusR. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153-1233.
74.
LevineS.WhiteP. E. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583-601.
75.
LewickiR. J.GrayB.ElliottM. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts. Washington, DC: Island Press.
76.
LindblomC. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39, 517-526.
77.
LovanW. R.MurrayM.ShafferR. (Eds.). (2004). Participatory governance: Planning, conflict mediation and public decision-making in civil society. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
78.
MandellM. P. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
79.
McGuireM.AgranoffR. A. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89, 265-284.
80.
MillarA.SimeoneR.CarnevaleJ. (2001). Logic models: A systems tool for performance management. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, 73-81.
81.
MooreM. H. (1995). Creating public value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
NorthP. (2000). Is there space for organization from below within the UK government’s action zones? A test of “collaborative planning.”Urban Studies, 37, 1261-1278.
84.
NowellB.HarrisonL. M. (2010). Leading change through collaborative partnerships. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 39, 19-34.
85.
NutleyS.WalterI.DaviesH. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
86.
O’FlynnJ.AlfordJ. (2008). The separation/specification dilemma in contracting: The local government experience in Victoria. Public Administration, 86, 205-224.
87.
O’LearyR.BinghamR. (Eds.). (2009). The collaborative public manager. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
88.
PacanowskyM. (1995). Team tools for wicked problems. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 36-51.
89.
PadillaY. C.DaigleL. (1998). Inter-agency collaboration in an international setting. Administration in Social Work, 22, 65-81.
90.
Pahl-WostlC.HareM. (2004). Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 193-206.
91.
ParksS. D. (2005). Leadership can be taught: A bold approach for a complex world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
92.
PetticrewM.RobertsH. (2005). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
93.
PielkeR. A.Jr. (2007). The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
94.
PollittC. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
95.
RadinB. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
96.
ReaganM. (1987). Regulation: The politics of policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
97.
ReinM. (1976). Social science and public policy. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
98.
RhodesR. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28, 1243-1264.
99.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
100.
RobertsN. C. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1, 1-19.
101.
RobertsN. C. (2001). Coping with wicked problems: The case of Afghanistan. In JonesL.GuthrieJ.SteaneP. (Eds.), Learning from international public management reform (pp. 353-375). London, UK: Emerald Publishing.
102.
RoseR. (1979). Ungovernability: Is there fire behind the smoke?Political Studies, 27, 351-370.
103.
SabatierP. A. (Ed.). (2007). Theories of the policy process (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
SavasE. (1987). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
107.
SchneiderV. (2012). Governance and complexity. In Levi-FaurD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 129-142). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
108.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
109.
SchonD. A.ReinM. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books.
110.
SchorrL. B. (2003). Determining “what works” in social programs and social policies: Toward a more inclusive knowledge base. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
ToulminS. (2001). Return to reason (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120.
Van DoorenW.BouckaertG.HalliganJ. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. London, UK: Routledge.
121.
WebberM. M. (1978). A difference paradigm for planning. In BurchillR.SternliebG. (Eds.), Planning theory in the 1980s: A search for future directions (pp. 151-162). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
122.
WeberE. P.KhademianA. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334-349.
123.
WilkinsP. (2002). Accountability and joined-up government. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61, 114-119.
124.
WilliamsP. (2012). Collaboration in public policy and practice: Perspectives on boundary spanners. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
125.
WilsonJ. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
126.
WondolleckJ. M.YaffeeS. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
