BowenW.DunnR. A.KasdanD. (2010). What is urban studies? Context, internal structure, and content. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32, 199-227.
2.
BowenW.DunnR. A.KasdanD. (2011). Response to “The history in urban studies: A comment.”Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 107-110.
3.
BozemanB. (2012). The problem of beauty contest scholarship in public administration: And a possible alternative. Administration & Society, 44, 1019-1026.
4.
CandlerG. (2006, April). Further evidence on the social equity record of academic public administration. Paper presented at the American Society for Public Administration Conference, Denver, CO. Retrieved from http://www.unf.edu/~g.candler/articles/Candler-ASPA06.pdf
5.
GoodsellC. T. (2012). Are the “Great Books” great?Administration & Society, 44, 885-887.
6.
HarrisR.SmithM. (2011). The history in urban studies: A comment. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 99-105.
7.
KasdanD. (2012). “Great Books” of public administration 1990-2010: Revisiting Sherwood’s survey in the wake of reinventing government. Administration & Society, 44, 625-639.
8.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.Jr.(2012). Influence: What kind? And how to know?Administration & Society, 44, 888-893.
9.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
10.
RaadscheldersJ. (2012). What are “Great Books” in the study of public administration? Some polemic thoughts about the surveys of Sherwood and Kasdan. Administration & Society, 44, 894-904.
11.
RaineyH. G. (2013). Response to Kasdan’s “Great Books”: How do we serve the needs of academics, practitioners, and students?Administration & Society, 45, 119-121.
12.
SherwoodF. P. (1990). The half-century’s “Great Books” in public administration. Public Administration Review, 50, 249-264.
13.
StillmanR. J.II. (2010). Public administration: Concepts and cases (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
14.
StiversC. (2012). “Something there is . . . ”: Commentary on Kasdan’s “Great Books” redo. Administration & Society, 44, 1014-1018.