We leverage economic theory, network theory, and social network analytical techniques to bring greater conceptual and methodological rigor to understand how information is exchanged during disasters. We ask, “How can information relationships be evaluated more systematically during a disaster response?” “Infocentric analysis”—a term and approach we develop here—can (a) define an information market and information needs, (b) identify suppliers of information and mechanisms for information exchange, (c) map the information exchange network, and (d) diagnose information exchange failures. These steps are essential for describing how information flows, diagnosing complications, and positing solutions to rectify information problems during a disaster.
BeebeG. S.OmiP. N. (1993). Wildland burning: The perception of risk. Journal of Forestry, 91, 19-24.
2.
BorgattiS. P.EverettM. G.FreemanL. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
3.
ButtsC. T. (2008). Social network analysis: A methodological introduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 13-41.
4.
ButtsC. T. (2009). Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science, 325, 414-416.
5.
ChoiS. O.BrowerR. S. (2006). When practice matters more than government plans. Administration & Society, 37, 651-678.
6.
ComfortL. K.HaaseT. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action. Public Works Management & Policy, 10, 328-343.
7.
ComfortL. K.KapucuN. (2006). Inter-organizational coordination in extreme events: The world trade center attacks, September 11, 2001. Natural Hazards, 39, 309-327.
8.
ComfortL. K.KilkonK.ZagoreckiA. (2004). Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 295-313.
9.
DilmaghaniR. B.RoaoR. R. (2007, January). Hybrid communication infrastructure and social implications for disaster management. Paper presented at the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI.
10.
DrabekT. E.McEntireD. A. (2002). Emergence phenomena and multiorganizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20, 197-224.
11.
DrabekT. E.McEntireD. A. (2003). Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: Lessons, trends, and opportunities form the research literature. Disaster Prevention and Management, 12, 97-112.
12.
EM-DAT: OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. (2012). Report created for 2000-2009 for all natural disasters in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.emdat.be/disaster-list
13.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
HaleC. M.FrelichL. E.ReichP. B. (2006). Changes in hardwood forest understory plant communities in response to European earthworm invasions. Ecology, 87, 1637-1649.
15.
HammerR. B.StewartS. I.RadeloffV. C. (2009). Demographic trends, the wildland-urban interface, and wildfire management. Society & Natural Resources, 22, 777-782.
16.
HannemanR. A.RiddleM. (2005). Introduction to social network analysis. Riverside, CA: University of California. (Published in digital form: http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/)
17.
HeathR. L.JaesubL.LanN. (2009). Crisis and risk approaches to emergency management planning and communication: The role of similarity and sensitivity. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 123-141.
18.
HerzogR. J. (2007). A model of natural disaster administration: Naming and framing theory and reality. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 29, 586-604.
19.
IrwinR. L. (1989). The incident command system (ICS). In Auf der HeideE. (Ed.), Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination (pp. 133-163). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
20.
JonesC.HesterlyW. S.BorgattiS. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22, 911-945.
21.
KapucuN. (2005). Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections, 26, 33-48.
22.
KapucuN. (2006). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. American Review of Public Administration, 36, 207-225.
23.
KapucuN.Van WartM. (2006). The evolving role of the public sector in managing catastrophic disasters. Administration & Society, 38, 279-308.
24.
KitzbergerT.SwetnamT. W.VeblenT. T. (2001). Inter-hemispheric synchrony of forest fires and the el Niño-Southern oscillation. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 315-326.
25.
LaumannE. O.MarsdenP. V.PrenskyD. (1989). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In FreemanL. C.WhiteD. R.RomneyA. K. (Eds.), Research methods of social network analysis (pp. 61-87). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
26.
LindB. E.TiradoM.ButtsC. T.Petrescu-PrahovaM. (2008). Brokerage roles in disaster response: Organisational mediation in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. International Journal of Emergency Management, 5, 75-99.
27.
LoganJ. A.RégnièreJ.PowellJ. A. (2003). Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 130-137.
28.
MagsinoS. L. (2009). Applications of social network analysis for building community disaster resilience: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29.
McCaffreyS. M. (2004). Fighting fire with education: What is the best way to reach out to homeowners?Journal of Forestry, 102, 12-19.
30.
McEntireD. A.FullerC.JohnstonC. W.WeberR. (2002). A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public Administration Review, 62, 267-281.
31.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
MonroeM. C.PennisiL.McCaffreyS. M.MiletiD. (2005). Social science to improve fuels management: A synthesis of research related to communicating with the public on fuels management efforts. St. Paul, MN: North Central Research Station, US Forest Service, USDA. Retrieved from http://nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc267.pdf
33.
MoynihanD. P. (2009). The network governance of crisis response: Case studies of incident command systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 895-915.
34.
National Wildfire Coordinating Group. (2009). Quadrennial fire review. Washington, DC: National Association of State Foresters.
35.
OlsenC. S.ShindlerB. A. (2007). Citizen-agency interactions in planning and decision making after large fires. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station US Forest Service, USDA. Retrieved from http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr715.pdf
36.
PolletJ.OmiP. N. (2002). Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in Ponderosa Pine forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 11, 1-10.
37.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
38.
RadeloffV. C.HammerR. B.StewartS. I.FriedJ. S.HolcombS. S.McKeefryJ. F. (2005). The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 799-805.
39.
SchmidtK. M.MenakisJ. P.HardyC. C.HannW. J.BunnellD. L. (2002). Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel management. Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Research Station, US Forest Service, USDA. Retrieved from http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fsbdev3_061488.pdf
40.
SeegerM. W. (2006). Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 232-244.
41.
SeegerM. W.SellnowT. W.UlmerR. R. (2003). Communication and organizational crisis. Westport, CT: Praeger.
42.
StallingsR. A.QuarantelliE. L. (1985). Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Administration Review, 45, 93-100.
43.
SteelmanT.McCaffreyS. (2013). Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management. Natural Hazards. 65(1), 683-705.
44.
StiglerG. J. (1961). The economics of information. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 213-225.
45.
TaylorJ. G.GilletteS. C.HodgsonR. W.DowningJ. L.BurnsM. R.ChavezD. J.HoganJ. T. (2007). Informing the network: Improving communication with interface communities during wildland fire. Human Ecology Review, 14, 198-211.
46.
TierneyK. J. (1985). Emergency medical preparedness and response in disasters: The need for interorganizational coordination. Public Administration Review, 45, 77-84.
47.
TopperC. M.CarleyK. M. (1999). A structural perspective on the emergence of network organizations. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 24, 67-96.
48.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WilliamsD. E.OlaniranB. A. (1998). Expanding the crisis planning function: Introducing elements of risk communication to crisis communication practice. Public Relations Review, 24, 387-400.
50.
WilliamsonO. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-296.
