A growing number of state welfare agencies are using the Internet to communicate with potential and current clients. Although public management benefits are clear, little is known about client perspectives. This mixed-methods research project examines the topics of application security, reliability, appropriateness, and ease of use, and personal experiences of potential users to understand opinions of online welfare applications. Focus group findings highlight direct benefits, such as speed and ease of use, and indirect benefits, such as holding caseworkers accountable and avoiding unpleasant office conditions. Study participants also identified exceptions like emergencies and applicants with special needs. Despite mixed feelings, many participants preferred online applications to in-person, worker-led eligibility interviews.
AakerJ.FournierS.BraselS. A. (2004). When good brands do bad. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1-16.
2.
AndersonS. G. (2001). Welfare recipient views about caseworker performance: Lessons for developing TANF case management practices. Families in Society, 82, 165-175.
3.
AronL.CastanedaR. M.KoralikR. (2006). Using the Internet to provide ethnic and culturally diverse populations with high-quality child support information: The case of Beehive. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
4.
BitnerM. J. (2001). Self-service technologies: What do customers expect?Marketing Management, 10, 10-11.
5.
BlackC. G. (2006). E-Welfare reform. Dallas, TX: National Center for Policy Analysis.
6.
BrodkinE. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71, 1-33.
7.
BurawoyM. (1991). Ethnography unbound. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
CaoZ.RobbD.LuQ. (2008). Service failure, recovery, and improvement: The case of a Chinese restaurant. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 4, 218-242.
9.
CarringtonK. (2005). Street-level discretion: Is there a need for control?Public Administration Quarterly, 29, 141-162.
10.
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2012, May). Online services for key low-income benefit programs. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/files/1-14-04tanf.pdf
11.
Chung-HerreraB. G.GoldschmidtN.HoffmanK. D. (2004). Customer and employee views of critical service incidents. Journal of Services Marketing, 18, 241-254.
De MatosC. A.HenriqueJ. L.RossiC. A. V. (2007). Service recovery paradox: A meta-analysis. Journal of Service Research, 10, 60-77.
17.
Felke-MorrisT. (2011). Web development and design foundations with XHTML (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18.
FlemingD. E.ArtisA. B. (2010). Measuring corporate affinity for technology: A scale for customers and employees. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 30, 167-179.
19.
GelbrichK. (2009). Beyond just being dissatisfied: How angry and helpless customers react to failures when using self-service technologies. Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, 40-59.
20.
Government Accountability Office. (2002). Human Services Integration: Results of a GAO cosponsored conference on modernizing information systems. GAO-02–121. Washington, DC :United States Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Committees.
21.
Government Accountability Office. (2007). Food Stamp Program: Use of alternative methods to apply for and maintain benefits could be enhanced by additional evaluation and information on promising practices. GAO-07–573. Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Chairman, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate.
22.
HasenfeldY. (1999). Social services and welfare-to-work: Prospects for the social work profession. Administration in Social Work, 23, 185-199.
23.
HeflinC.MueserP. (2010). Assessing the impact of a modernized application process on Florida’s Food Stamp caseload (University of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research Discussion Paper Series, DP2010–01). Retrieved from http://www.ukcpr.org/Publications/DP2010-01.pdf
24.
HerzensteinM.PosavacS. S.BrakusJ. J. (2007). Adoption of new and really new products: The effects of self-regulation systems and risk salience. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 251-260.
25.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
26.
HoffmanL.2006. Improving access to benefits for low-income families. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices.
27.
HolcombP. A.TumlinK.KoralekR.CappsR.ZuberiA. (2003). The application process for TANF, Food Stamps, Medicaid and SCHIP: Issues for agencies and applicant, including immigrants and limited English speaker. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
28.
HolzerM.ManoharanA.ShickR.StowersG. (2008). U.S. States E-Governance Report: An Assessment of State Websites. Newark, NJ: National Center for Public Performance.
29.
JohnsonD.BardhiF.DunnD. T. (2008). Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self-service technology: The role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 416-443.
30.
LiaoH. (2007). Do it right this time: The role of employee service recovery performance in customer-perceived justice and customer loyalty after service failures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 475-489.
31.
LiaoZ.CheungM. (2008). Measuring consumer satisfaction in internet banking: A core framework. Communications of the ACM, 51, 47-51.
32.
LinvilleE. (2006). Eligibility modernization: The need for change. Indianapolis: Indiana Family and Social Services Administration.
33.
LipskyM. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
34.
MannixM. R.LaCheenC.FreedmanH. A.CohanM. (2008). Public benefits privatization and modernization: Recent developments and advocacy. Clearinghouse Review: Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 42, 4-15.
35.
MaxhamJ. G.NetemeyerR. G. (2002). A longitudinal study of complaining customers’ evaluations of multiple service failures and recovery efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 57-71.
36.
MeuterM. L.OstromA. L.RoundtreeR. I.BitnerM. J. (2000). Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 50-64.
37.
O’ConnorM. (2002). Using the Internet to make work pay for low-income families. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
OysermanD. (2007). Social identity and self-regulation. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
39.
ParentM.VandebeekC. A.GeminoA. C. (2005). Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22, 720-736.
SchottL. (2009). Applying online: Using technology to enroll low-wage workers in public benefits. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 4(Winter), 116-135. Retrieved from http://165.124.73.46/journals/njlsp/v4/n1/7/7Schott.pdf
42.
SchottL.ParrottS. (2005). Using the Internet to facilitate enrollment in benefit programs: Eligibility screeners and online applications. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from http://www.centeronbudget.org/files/12-14-04tanf.pdf
43.
SirdeshmukhD.SinghJ.SabolB. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37.
44.
SmithA. K.BoltonR. N.WagnerJ. (1999). A model of customer satisfaction with service encounters involving failure and recovery. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 356-372.
45.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66, 354-369.
46.
Van NoortG.KerkhofP.FennisB. M. (2008). The persuasiveness of online safety cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of web content on consumers’ risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 58-72.
47.
WelchE. W.HinnantC. C.MoonM. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 371-391.
48.
WestD. M. (2004). E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64, 15-27.
49.
WestjohnS. A.ArnoldM. J.MagnussonP.ZdravkovicS.ZhaoJ. X. (2009). Technology readiness and usage: A global-identity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 250-265.
