Applying a neoinstitutionalist perspective, the article analyzes administrative research in Finland. The results pinpoint contradictory official microinstitutional regulation influencing the research albeit moderated by flexible implementation, and recent institutional weakening in the status of the research field. Institutional trade-offs obtain between the limited global scholarly contribution of Finland’s administrative research and the domestic legitimation it has enjoyed so far. The characteristic radical institutional changes have comprised measures for the academic upgrading of teaching and research disciplines. Besides invigorating the global contribution of Finland’s administrative research, the results suggest the rehabilitation of public administration as an academic field in the country.
Academy of Finland. (2010). Research field classification. Available from http://www.aka.fi
2.
AmentaE.CarenN.ChiarelloE.SuY. (2010). The political consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 287-307.
3.
BeckertJ. (2010). Institutional isomorphism revisited: Convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociological Theory, 28, 150-166.
4.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1991). The social construction of reality (1st ed.). London, England: Penguin Books.
5.
BernauerT.GilardiF. (2011). Publication output of Swiss political science departments. Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 279-303.
6.
BouckaertG.van de DonkW. (Eds.). (2010). The European Group of Public Administration 1975-2010. Bruxelles, Belgium: Bruylant.
7.
BoxenbaumE.Pedersen StrandgaardJ. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism—A case of institutional work. In SuddabyR.LawrenceT.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work (pp. 178-204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrunssonN. (2009). Reform as routine: Organizational change and stability in the modern world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
BrunssonN.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21, 721-746.
10.
ChristensenT.LægreidP.RonessP. G.RøvikK. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. London, England: Routledge.
11.
CostasR.BordonsM. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193-203.
12.
DemmkeC.MoilanenT. (2010). Civil services in the EU of 27. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
13.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
14.
DobbinF.SimmonsB.GarrettG. (2007). The global diffusion of public policies: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning?Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472.
15.
DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W. (2006). Scientization: Making the world safe for organizing. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 33-52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W.HwangH. (2009). Global organization: Rationalization and actorhood as dominant scripts. In MeyerR. E.SahlinK.VentrescaM.WalgenbachP. (Eds.), Ideology and institutions (pp. 17-43). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
17.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
18.
FerlieE.LynnL. E., jr.PollittC. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
Finland’s Government Almanac. (2010). Finland’s Government Almanac, in Finnish. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
20.
FourcadeM. (2006). The construction of a global profession: The transnationalization of economics. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 145-194.
21.
FrankD. H.RobinsonK. J.OlesenJ. (2011). The global expansion of environmental education in universities. Comparative Education Review, 55, 546-573.
22.
FrankD. H.SchoferE.TorresJ. C. (1994). Rethinking history: Change in the university curriculum, 1910-1990. Sociology of Education, 67, 231-242.
23.
FrickelS.GrossN. (2005). A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements. American Sociological Review, 70, 204-232.
24.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
25.
GioiaD. A.PriceK. N.ThomasJ. B. (2010). Forging and identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 1-46.
26.
GlynnM. A. (2008). Beyond constraint: How institutions enable identities. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 413-430). London, England: Sage.
27.
Government Act. (2004). Act on University Degrees, in Finnish. August19, 2004/794.
28.
Government Act. (2010). Act on the National Education and Training Committees, in Finnish. October14, 2010/882.
29.
GuentherK. M. (2009). The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research, 9, 411-421.
HedmoT.Sahlin-AnderssonK.WedlinL. (2006). The emergence of a European regulatory field of management education. In DjelicM.-L.Sahlin-AnderssonK.(Eds.), Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation (pp. 308-328). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
HirschJ. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572.
33.
KickertW. J. M. (Ed.). (2008). The study of public management in Europe and the US. London, England: Routledge.
34.
KrueckenG.MeierM. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In DroriG. S.MeyerJ. W.HwangH. (Eds.), Globalization and organization (pp. 241-257). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
LaihoA. (2010). Academisation of nursing education in the Nordic countries. Higher Education, 60, 641-656.
36.
LeeC. K.StrangD. (2006). The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883-909.
37.
LoewensteinJ.OcasioW.JonesC. (2012). Vocabularies and vocabulary structures: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 41-86.
38.
MarchJ. G.SchultzM.ZhouX. (2000). The dynamics of rules: Change in written organizational codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
MartikainenT.UusikyläP. (1994). Kadonnutta imperiumia etsimässä (evaluation of administrative research and related higher education), in Finnish. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Education.
40.
MeriläinenS.TienariJ.ThomasR.DavisA. (2008). Hegemonic academic practices: Experiences of publishing from the periphery. Organization, 15, 584-597.
41.
MeyerJ. W. (2000). Globalization: Sources and effects on national states and societies. International Sociology, 15, 233-248.
42.
MeyerJ. W. (2002). Globalization and the expansion and standardization of management. In Sahlin-AnderssonK.EngwallL. (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge (pp. 33-44). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
43.
MeyerJ. W. (2008). Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 789-809). London, England: Sage.
44.
MeyerJ. W.BoliJ.ThomasG. M.RamirezF. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 144-181.
45.
MeyerJ. W.BromleyP.RamirezF. O. (2010). Human rights in social science textbooks: Cross-national analyses, 1970–2008. Sociology of Education, 83, 111-134.
46.
MeyerJ. W.JeppersonR. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory, 18, 100-120.
47.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
48.
MeyerM. W.ZuckerL. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Ministry of Education. (2005). Statute on the education responsibilities of universities, in Finnish. July14, 2005/568.
50.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2011a). Proposal for a reform of university funding, in Finnish. Helsinki, Finland: Author.
51.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2011b). Statute on the Master’s programs at the universities, in Finnish. December22, 2011/1474.
52.
NegroG.KoçakÖ.HsuG. (2010). Research on categories in the sociology of organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 31, 3-35.
53.
NoordegraafM.BrandsenT.HuitemaD. (2006). Fragmented but forceful: Dutch administrative sciences and their institutional evolution. Public Administration, 84, 989-1006.
54.
OppK.-D. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique, and synthesis. London, England: Routledge.
55.
PaasiA. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37, 769-789.
56.
PeschU. (2008). The publicness of public administration. Administration and Society, 40, 170-193.
57.
PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.). (2007a). Handbook of public administration. London, England: Sage.
58.
PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.). (2007b). Institutionalism: Four Volumes. London, England: Sage.
59.
PowellW. W.ColyvasJ. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276-298). London, England: Sage.
60.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2010). Identity without boundaries: Public administration’s canon(s) of integration. Administration and Society, 42, 131-159.
61.
RasmussenA. C. (2011). Contraception as health? The framing of issue categories in contemporary policy making. Administration and Society, 43, 930-953.
62.
RøvikK. A. (2011). From fashion to virus: An alternative theory of organizations’ handling of management ideas. Organization Studies, 32, 631-653.
63.
SahlinK.WedlinL. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218-242). London, England: Sage.
64.
SauderM.EspelandW. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 74, 63-82.
65.
ScheuerS.ScheuerJ. D. (Eds.). (2008). The anatomy of change: A neo-institutionalist perspective. Copenhagen, Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press.
66.
SchmittC. (2011). What drives the diffusion of privatization policy?Journal of Public Policy, 31, 95-117.
67.
SchneibergM.ClemensE. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 24, 195-227.
68.
SchoferE. F. (2003). The global institutionalization of geological science, 1800 to 1900. American Sociological Review, 68, 730-759.
SchriewerJ. (2009). “Rationalized myths” in European higher education: The construction and diffusion of the Bologna model. European Education, 41, 31-51.
71.
SeeckH.LaaksoA. (2010). Adoption of managerial ideologies in Finnish academic management education, 1960-2007. Management & Organizational History, 5, 37-64.
72.
StrangD.MacyM. W. (2001). In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 147-182.
73.
StrangD.MeyerJ. W. (1993). Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22, 487-511.
74.
StrangS.SouleS. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265-290.
75.
TolbertP. S.ZuckerL. G. (1983). Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 22-39.
VirtanenT. (2010). Finnish PA and PA in Finnish. In BouckaertG.van de DonkW. (Eds.), The European Group of Public Administration 1975-2010 (pp. 162-168). Bruxelles, Belgium: Bruylant.
78.
WangY. (2008). Agency: The internal split of structure. Sociological Forum, 23, 481-502.
79.
ZietsmaC.LawrenceT. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 189-221.
80.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
