AnechiaricoF.JacobsJ. B. (1996). The pursuit of absolute integrity: How corruption control makes government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2001). Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 901-932.
3.
BlakeW. (1803/1974). Proverbs of hell. Hamburg: Taurus Press of Willow Dean.
4.
ChubbJ.MoeT. (1990). Politics, markets, and schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
EdelmanL. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1531-1576.
6.
EdelmanM. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
7.
FlindersM. (2011). Daring to be a Daniel: The pathology of politicized accountability in a monitory democracy. Administration & Society, 43, 595-619.
8.
GeorgeA. (1980). Presidential decision-making: The effective use of information and a device. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
JervisR. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
KundaZ. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
MartinD. (02April, 2008). Nikolai K. Baibakov, a top soviet economic official, dies at 97. New York Times, p. A21.
12.
MarchJ. (2010). The ambiguities of experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
MarchJ.OlsenJ. (1995). Democratic governance. New York, NY: Free Press.
14.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 173-220.
15.
TalebN. (2008). The black swan. New York, NY: Random House.
16.
TetlockP. E. (1981). Pre- to post-election shifts in presidential rhetoric: Impression management or cognitive adjustment?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 41, 207-212.
17.
TetlockP. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the ideological beholder?Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293-326.
18.
TetlockP. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
TetlockP. E.MellersB. A. (2011). Structuring accountability systems in organizations: Key trade-offs and critical unknowns. In FischhoffB.ChauvinC. (Eds.), Intelligence analysis: Behavioral and social scientific foundations (pp. 249-270). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
TetlockP. E.VieiderF.GrantA. (2011). Ideology, agency and accountability: Explaining shifting managerial preferences for alternative accountability regimes.
21.
TetlockP. E.VisserP.SinghR.PolifroniM.ElsonB.MazzoccoP.. . . RescoberP. (2007). People as intuitive prosecutors: The impact of social control motives on attributions of responsibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 195-209.
22.
WegenerD. T.PettyR. E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.