In “Into the Woods,” Karen Evans describes an increasingly hollow public administration environment that is shaped by a misplaced quest for efficiency. She looks to the pragmatism of John Dewey as a way to remedy the situation. This article extends her analysis by linking pragmatism to reflective thought, inquiry, nonlinear dynamics, and communication theories. Finally, a few suggestions for how to more fully take pragmatism to the PA workplace are discussed.
ArgyrisC. (1992). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
2.
BeebeS. A.BeebeS. B.IvyD. K. (2010). Communication: Principles for a lifetime (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
BrownJ. (2005). The world café: Shaping futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
4.
BuckleyW. (1968). Society as a complex adaptive system. In BuckleyW. (Ed.), Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist (pp. 490-513). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
5.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
DeweyJ. (1925). Experience and nature. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
7.
DeweyJ. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
8.
DeweyJ. (1998). Analysis of reflective thinking. In HickmanL. A.AlexanderT. M. (Eds.), The essential Dewey (Vol. 2, pp. 137-144). Bloomington: Indiana University Press (Original work published in 1933, as part of How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: DC Heath).
9.
DeweyJ. (1998). The reflex arc in psychology. In HickmanL. A.AlexanderT. M. (Eds.), The essential Dewey (Vol. 2, pp. 3-10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press (Original work published in 1896, Psychological Review, 3, 357-370).
10.
EpsteinJ. M.AxtellR. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
11.
EvansK. G. (2010). Into the woods: A cautionary tale for governance. Administration & Society, 42:859-883.
12.
FisherB. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision-making. Speech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
13.
FisherB. A.StutmanR. K. (1987). An assessment of group trajectories: Analyzing developmental breakpoints. Communication Quarterly, 35, 105-124.
14.
FolgerJ. P.PooleM. S.StutmanR. K. (2009). Working through conflict: Strategies, relationships, groups, and organizations (6th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
15.
HageG. (1980). Theories of organizations: Form, process and transformation. New York, NY: John Wiley.
16.
HartmanJ.KhademaianA. M. (2010). Culture change refined and revitalized: The road show and guide for pragmatic action. Public Administration Review, 70, 845-856.
17.
HollandJ. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York, NY: Free Press.
18.
HollandJ. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
19.
KauffmanS. (1993). The origins of order: Self organization and selection in evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
KauffmanS. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
LarsonC. E. (1969). Forms of analysis and small group problem-solving. Speech Monographs, 69(36), 452-455.
22.
LarsonC. E. (1971). Speech communication research on small groups. Speech Teacher, 20, 452-455.
23.
LarsonC. E.GratzR. D. (1970). Problem-solving discussion training and T-group training: An experimental comparison. Speech Teacher, 19, 54-57.
LorenzE. (1996). The essence of chaos. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
26.
MarionR. (1999). The edge of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
MeyerA. D.GoesJ. B.BrooksG. R. (1995). Organizations reacting to hyperturbulence. In HuberG. P.Van de VenA. H. (Eds.), Longitudinal field research methods: Studying processes in organizational change (pp. 66-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
28.
MillerJ. H.PageS. E. (2007). Complex adaptive systems: An introduction to computational models of social life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
QuinnR. E.RohrbaughJ. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5, 122-140.
30.
RobbinsH.FinelyM. (1996). Why change doesn’t work: Why initiatives go wrong and how to try again—and succeed. Princeton, NJ: Peterson’s.
31.
SalemP. J. (2008). The seven communication reasons organizations do not change. Corporate Communications, 13, 333-348.
32.
SengeP.SmithB.KruschwitzN.LaurJ.SchleyS. (2008). The necessary revolution: How individuals and organizations are working together to create a sustainable world. New York: NY: Doubleday.
33.
ShieldsP. M. (1996). Pragmatism: Exploring public administration’s policy imprint. Administration & Society, 28, 390-411.
34.
ShieldsP. M. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35, 510-538.
35.
ShieldsP. M. (2005). Classical pragmatism does not need an upgrade: Lessons for public administration. Administration & Society, 37, 504-518.
36.
ShieldsP. M. (2008). Rediscovering the Taprot: Is classical pragmatism the route to renew public administration?Public Administration Review, 68, 205-221.
37.
SmithM. E. (2002). Success rates for different types of organizational change. Performance Improvement, 41, 26-33.
38.
WilsonE. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
