This study investigates the effects of red tape and strategy on organizational performance. Data come from 135 English local government authorities. Data are collected on several dimensions of red tape, three types of strategy (prospecting, defending, and reacting), and internal and external perceptual measures of organizational performance. The findings show that red tape lowers performance. The harmful effects of red tape are, however, mitigated by a strategic stance of prospecting. Defending has no effect on the impact of red tape on organizational performance, whereas reacting tends to amplify the harmful effects—thus worsening organizational performance. The primary implication of these findings is that public organizations should move toward more proactive strategies.
Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1968). Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. American Sociological Review, 33, 912-930.
2.
Amburgey, T.L., Kelly, D., & Barnett, W.P. (1990). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 51-73.
3.
Amirkhanyan, A.A., Kim, H.J., & Lambright, K.T. (2008). Does the public sector outperform the nonprofit and for-profit sectors? Evidence from a national panel study on nursing homes quality and access. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 326-353.
4.
Andrews, R. (2005). Analysing deprivation and local authority performance: Implications for CPA. Public Money & Management, 24, 19-26.
5.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Law, J., & Walker, R.M. (2005). External constraints and public sector performance: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government . Public Administration, 83, 639-656.
6.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2006a). Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 52-63.
7.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2006b). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Armstrong, H.W., & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Baldwin, J.N. (1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape and their impact on motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 20, 7-28.
11.
Barnett, W.P., & Freeman, J. (2001). Too much of a good thing? Product proliferation and organizational failure. Organization Science, 21, 539-558.
12.
Blair, T. (2002). The courage of our convictions: Why reform of the public services is the route to social justice (Fabian Ideas 603). London: Fabian Society.
13.
Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (1997). Using single respondents in strategy research . British Journal of Management, 8, 119-132.
14.
Boyne, G.A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory framework in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22, 17-24.
15.
Boyne, G.A., Farrell, C., Law, J., Powell, M., & Walker, R.M. (2003). Evaluating public management reform. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
16.
Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231-252.
17.
Bozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 273-303.
18.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Bozeman, B., Reed, P., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration & Society, 24, 290-322.
20.
Bretschneider, S. (1990). Managing information systems in public and private organizations: An empirical test. Public Administration Review , 50, 536-545.
21.
Brewer, G.A. (2005). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 505-527.
22.
Brewer, G.A. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on U.S. federal agencies. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 34-45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Brewer, G.A., & Selden, S.C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 685-711.
24.
Brewer, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (in press). The impact of red tape on organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
25.
Buchanan, B. (1975). Red tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences between public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6, 423-444.
26.
Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1992). How organizations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. London: Routledge.
27.
Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 1-30.
Coursey, D.H., & Pandey, S.K. (2007). Content domain, measurement, and validity of the red tape concept. A second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 342-361.
30.
Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers. British Journal of Management, 17, 215-236.
31.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Indices of deprivation 2000. London: HMSO.
32.
Enticott, G. (2003). Researching local government using electronic surveys. Local Government Studies, 29, 52-67.
33.
Enticott, G., Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (in press). The use of multiple informants in public administration research: Data aggregation using organizational echelons. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
34.
Evans, J.D., & Green, C.L. (2000). Marketing strategy, constituent influence, and resource allocation: An application of the Miles and Snow typology to closely held firms in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. Journal of Business Research , 50, 2225-2231.
35.
Gershon, Sir P. (2004). Releasing resources to the front-line: Independent review of public sector efficiency. London: HM Treasury.
36.
Hambrick, D.C. (1983). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow's strategic types. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 5-26.
37.
Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
38.
Hawes, J.M., & Crittenden, W.F. (1984). A taxonomy of competitive retailing strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 275-287.
39.
Kelly, J.M., & Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610-620.
40.
Martin, S., Walker, R.M., Ashworth, R., Boyne, G.A., Enticott, G., Entwistle, T., et al. (2003). The long term evaluation of best value and its impact: Baseline report. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
41.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process . New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle . Management Science, 30, 1161-1183.
43.
Office for National Statistics. (2003). Census, 2001. National report for England and Wales. London : Office for National Statistics.
44.
Office of Public Service Reform. (2002). Reforming our public services: Principles into practice. London: The Prime Minister's Office of Public Service Reform.
45.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Addison-Wesley.
46.
Osborne, S.P., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. London: Routledge .
47.
Ostrom, E. (1973). The need for multiple indicators of measuring the output of public agencies. Policy Studies Journal, 2, 85-91.
48.
Pandey, S.K. (2003). National Administrative Studies Project (NASP-II): A national survey of managers in state health and human service agencies. Camden, NJ: Rutgers University, Department of Public Policy and Administration.
49.
Pandey, S.K., Coursey, D.H., & Moynihan, D.P. (2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance and Management Review, 30, 398-425.
50.
Pandey, S.K., & Kingsley, G.A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration and Research and Theory , 10, 779-799.
51.
Pandey, S.K., & Moynihan, D.P. (2006). Bureaucratic red tape and organizational performance: Testing the moderating role of culture and political support. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., & R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 130-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Pandey, S.K., & Scott, P.G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 553-580.
53.
Park, R.B. (1984). Linking objective and subjective measures of performance . Public Administration Review, 44, 118-127.
54.
Pettigrew, A.M.,Ferlie, E., & McKee, L. (1992). Shaping strategic change. London: Sage.
55.
Pollitt, C. (2005). Decentralisation: A central concept in contemporary public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56.
Provan, K.G., & Milward, H.B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61, 414-423.
57.
Rainey, H.G. (1979). Perceptions of incentives in business and government: Implications for civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 39, 440-448.
58.
Rainey, H.G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
Rainey, H.G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-469.
60.
Rainey, H.G., Pandey, S.K., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55, 567-574.
61.
Shortell, S.M., & Zajac, E.J. (1990). Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity . Academy of Management Journal, 33, 817-832.
Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.]
64.
Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
65.
Turaga, R.M.R., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Red tape and public mangers' decision-making. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 363-379.
66.
Walker, R.M., & Boyne, G.A. (2006). Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U. K. Labour government's service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 371-393.
67.
Walker, R.M., & Brewer, G.A. (in press). An organizational echelon analysis of the determinants of red tape in public organizations. Public Administration Review.
68.
Walker, R.M., & Enticott, G. (2004). Using multiple-informants in public administration: Revisiting the managerial values and actions debate. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 417-434.
69.
Wall, T.B., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S.J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C.W., et al. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57, 95-118.
70.
Woodside, A.G., Sullivan, D.P., & Trappey, R.J. (1999). Assessing relationships among strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies, and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 45, 135-146.
71.
Zajac, E.J., & Shortell, S.M. (1989). Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction and performance implications. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 413-430.
