Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Law, J., & Walker, R.M. (2005). External constraints and local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government . Public Administration, 83(3), 639-656.
2.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., Meier, K.J., O'Toole L.J., Jr., & Walker, R.M. (2005). Representative bureaucracy, organizational strategy and public service performance: An empirical analysis of English local government . Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 489-504.
3.
Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O'Toole Jr., R. M. Walker (Eds.), Public services performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Audit Commission. (2003). Understanding the relationship between CPA outcomes and deprivation. London: Author.
5.
Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1992). How organizations measure success: The use of performance indicators in government. London: Routledge.
6.
Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. (2005). Goal ambiguity in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 1-30.
7.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. (1999). Best value performance indicators for 2000/2001 . London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
8.
Hunt, S. (1994). A realist theory of empirical testing: Resolving the theory-ladeness/objectivity debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 24, 133-158.
9.
Kelly, M.J., & Swindell, D. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610-621.
10.
Lane, R. (1996). Positivism, scientific realism and political science: Recent developments in the philosophy of science. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 8, 361-382.
McKelvey, B. (1997). Quasi-natural organizational science. Organization Science, 8, 352-380.
13.
Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2007). Deconstructing Larry Luton: Or what time is the next train to reality junction? Administration & Society, 39(6), 786-796.
14.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
15.
O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (1995). Diversity or cacophony? The research enterprise in public administration. Public Administration Review, 55(3), 293-297.
16.
Ostrom, E. (1973). The need for multiple indicators of measuring the output of public agencies. Policy Studies Journal, 2, 85-91.
17.
Parks, R.B. (1984). Linking objective and subjective measures of performance . Public Administration Review, 44(2), 118-127.
18.
Raz, J. (1990). Facing diversity: The case of epistemic abstinence . Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(1), 3-46.
