Applying Kearns's concept of the “accountability environment, ” this study of a reform of solid waste policy finds that the relationship between the state and local jurisdictions can best be described as structured by mechanisms of emergent accountability. After distinguishing hierarchical from emergent accountability, the author tests the following hypothesis: Under a structure of emergent accountability, progress toward a stated goal will be partial, as initial success plateaus short of full attainment. The findings support the hypothesis. It is recommended that future research on accountability relate the structure of the accountability environment to the level of outcomes achieved.
Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62, 777-795.
2.
Banfield, E. C. (1961). Political influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
3.
Behn, R. D. (1998). What right do public managers have to lead?Public Administration Review, 58, 209-224.
4.
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Caiden, G. (1989). The problem of ensuring the public accountability of public officials. In J. Jabbra & O. P. Dwivedi (Eds.), Public service accountability (pp. 17-38). West Hartford, CT: Kumerian.
6.
Crosby, B. C. (1966). Leading in a shared power world. In J. L. Perry (Ed.), Handbook of public administration(pp. 613-631). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Derthick, M. (1970). The influence of federal grants: Public assistance in Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Division of Waste Management. (1997). Guidelines for preparation of area solid waste management plan: Plan years 1998-2002. Frankfort, KT: Printing Office.
9.
Dwivedi, O. P., & Jabbra, J. (1989). Public service responsibility and accountability. In J. Jabbra & O. P. Dwivedi (Eds.), Public service accountability (pp. 1-16). Hartford, CT: Kumerian.
10.
Folz, D. H. (1999). Municipal recycling performance: A public sector success story. Public Administration Review, 59, 336-345.
11.
Frink, D. D., & Ferris, G. R. (1998). Accountability, impression management, and goal setting in the performance evaluation process. Human Relations, 51, 1259-1284.
12.
Kearns, K. P. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission. (2002). 2000-2001 state of Kentucky's environment. Available from Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Web site, http://www.eqc.ky.gov/pubs/soke01/
Kiewiet, D. R., & McCubbins, M. D. (1991). The logic of delegation: Congressional parties and the appropriation process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Luton, L. S. (1996). Politics of garbage. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
17.
Miller, G. (1991). Government financial management theory. New York: Marcel Dekker.
18.
O'Connell, L., Betz, M., & Shepherd, J. (1990). Social control and legitimacy: The contribution of accountability mechanisms. In J. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on social problems (Vol. 2, pp. 261-277). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19.
O'Toole, L. (1993). American intergovernmental relations: An overview. In L. O'Toole (Ed.), American intergovernmental relations (pp. 1-27). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
20.
Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47, 227-238.
21.
Romzek, B. S., & Ingraham, P. W. (2000). Cross pressures of accountability: Initiative, command, and failure in the Ron Brown plane crash. Public Administration Review, 60, 240-253.
22.
Ruhl, J. B. (1988). Interstate pollution control and resource development planning. Natural Resources Journal, 28, 293-314.
23.
Scicchitano, M. J., & Hedge, D. M. (1993). From coercion to partnership. Publius, 23, 107-121.
24.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.
25.
Tobin, R. J. (1992). Environmental protection and the new federalism. Publius, 22, 93-107.
26.
Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: Free Press.
27.
Wright, D. (1993). Models of national, state and local relationships. In L. O'Toole (Ed.), American intergovernmental relations (pp. 75-88). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
