Max Weber's distinction between purpose- and value-rationality is almost universally accepted in administrative theory. Its precise meaning is, however, unclear. In this article, more insight into the nature of Weber's distinction is claimed by approaching it from a (neo-) Kantian perspective. It is claimed that the Kantian contrast between autonomy and heteronomy of the will and the distinction between absolute and relative ends is at the heart of Weber's distinction. This implies that the distinction has paradoxical underpinnings as it is rooted in a moral context that does not fit Weber's sociological approach.
Brand, A. (1976). Toetsing en kritiek: Over objectiviteit en kennisbelang bij Weber en Habermas [Validation and critique: About objectivity and knowledge interest in Weber and Habermas]. Amsterdam: Boom.
2.
Brubaker, R. (1984). The limits of rationality. An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. London: George Allen & Unwin.
3.
Dassen, P. (1999). De onttovering van de wereld: Max Weber en het probleem van de moderniteit in Duitsland, 1890-1920 [The disenchantment of the world: Max Weber and the problem of modernity in Germany, 1890-1920]. Amsterdam: Van Oorschot.
4.
Dernison, A. H. (1980). De maatschappelijke en wijsgerige achtergrond van het werk van Max Weber [The societal and philosophical background of Max Weber's work]. In H. P. M. Goddijn (Ed.), Max Weber; Zijn leven, werk en betekenis(pp. 33-55). Baarn, the Netherlands: Ambo.
5.
De Valk, J. M. M. (1980). Webers karakteristiek van de moderne samenleving [Weber's characterization of modern society]. In H. P. M. Goddijn (Ed.), Max Weber; Zijn leven, werk en betekenis(pp. 211-228). Baarn, the Netherlands: Ambo.
6.
Donagan, A. (2003). Twentieth-century Anglo-American ethics. In L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds.), A history of Western ethics (2nd ed., pp. 139-151). New York: Routledge.
7.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity, Blackwell.
8.
Fischer, K. (1860). Immanuel Kant: Entwicklungsgeschichte und system der kritischen philosophie [Immanuel Kant: History of the development and system of critical philosophy] (Vol. 2). Mannheim, Germany: Verlagsbuchhandlung von Friedrich Bassermann.
9.
Hamlyn, D. W. (1990). The Penguin history of Western philosophy. London: Penguin.
10.
Harmon, M. M., & Mayer, R. T. (1986). Organization theory for public administration. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
11.
Hekman, S. J. (1994). Weber and post-positivist social theory. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment(pp. 267-286). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
12.
Hummel, R. P. (1998). Weber, Max. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (pp. 2389-2394). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber's types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1145-1179.
14.
Kant, I. (1961). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals]. Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam. (Original work published 1785)
15.
Kant, I. (1981a). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten [Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals]. In Kant werke(Book 6, pp. 9-102). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1785)
16.
Kant, I. (1981b). Metaphysik der Sitten: Tugendlehre [Metaphysics of morals: Theory of virtue]. In Kant werke(Book 7, pp. 501-634). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1797-1798)
17.
Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans. & Ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)
18.
Leivesley, R., Carr, A., & Kouzmin, A. (1994). Max Weber: Victim of ethnocentric mishandling, or how Weber became a management consultant. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of bureaucracy (pp. 41-63). New York: Marcel Dekker.
19.
Lemmen, M. M. W. (1980). De godsdienstsociologie van Max Weber [The sociology of religion of Max Weber]. In H. P. M. Goddijn (Ed.), Max Weber: Zijn leven, werk en betekenis (pp. 134-155). Baarn, the Netherlands: Ambo.
20.
Lenhardt, C. (1994). Max Weber and the legacy of critical idealism. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment(pp. 21-48). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
21.
Levine, D. N. (1981). Rationality and freedom: Weber and beyond. Sociological Inquiry, 51, 5-25.
22.
MacIntyre, A. (1998). A short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the Homeric age to the twentieth century (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
23.
Rutgers, M. R. (1996). The meaning of administration. Translating across boundaries. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5, 14-20.
24.
Sadri, M. (1982). Reconstruction of Max Weber's notion of rationality: An immanent model. Sociological Research, 49, 616-633.
25.
Schipper, F. (1993). Zin in organisatie: Een filosofische beschouwing over organisatiecultuur en rationaliteit [The sense of organization: A philosophical reflection on organizational culture and rationality]. Amsterdam: Boom.
26.
Schneewind, J. B. (2003). Seventeenth- and eighteenth-century ethics. In L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds.), A history of Western ethics (2nd ed., pp. 79-93). New York: Routledge.
27.
Schreurs, P. (2000). Enchanting rationality: An analysis of rationality in the Anglo-American discourse on public organization. Delft, the Netherlands: Eburon.
28.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
29.
Strauss, L. (1953). Natural right and history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1950)
30.
Tijmes, P. (1977). Over politiek valt met rede te twisten: Een onderzoek naar de rol van wetenschap en ethiek in het politieke denken van Max Weber [Politics can be debated reasonably: A study of the role of science and ethics in the political thinking of Max Weber]. Meppel, the Netherlands: Boom.
31.
Weber, M. (1921). Politik als beruf [Politics as a vocation]. In Gesammelte Politische Schriften (pp. 396-450). München, Germany: Drei Masken Verlag. (Original work published 1919)
32.
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und gesellschaft: Grundrisse der verstehende soziologie [Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology] (5th ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr.
33.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Weber, M. (1985a). Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften [The meaning of “value neutrality” in the social and economic sciences]. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), Gesammelte aufsätze zur wissenschaftslehre (6th ed., pp. 489-540). Tübingen: Mohr/Siebeck.(Original work published 1917)
35.
Weber, M. (1985b). Wissenschaft als beruf [Science as a vocation]. In J. Winckelmann (Ed.), Gesammelte aufsätze zur wissenschaftslehre (6th ed., pp. 582-613). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr/Siebeck. (Original work published 1919)
