In 2003, Administration& Society published Patricia Shields's “The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration.” Shortly thereafter, Hugh Miller responded with “Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade” in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration& Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship. Miller's article was followed by a series of 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American heritage dictionary of the English language(4th ed.). (2000). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Austin, D. (1986). A history of social work education, Social Work Education Monograph Series (Vol. 1). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3.
Bacchi, C. (1992). Pragmatism be damned: Richard Rorty's death wish for feminism. Hecate, St. Lucia, 18(2), 97-97.
4.
Bartle, J. (in press). Transportation infrastructure. In D. Robbins (Ed.), Handbook of public sector economics. New York: Marcel Dekker.
5.
Bogason, P., Miller, H. T.,& Kensen, S. (2002). Pragmatic, extra-formal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 675-692.
6.
Boisvert, R. D. (1998). Dewey's metaphysics: Ground-map of the prototypically real. In L. Hickman. (Ed), Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation(pp. 149-166). Indianapolis: Indiana University.
7.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. New York: D. C. Heath.
8.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Van Rees.
9.
Dewey, J. (1985). The need for recovery in philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works(Vol. 10, pp. 3-48). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
10.
Duran, J. (1993). The intersection of pragmatism and feminism. Hypathia, 8, 159-172.
11.
Evans, K. (2005). Upgrade or different animal altogether? Why old pragmatism better informs public management and new pragmatism misses the point. Administration & Society, 37, 248-255.
12.
Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1996). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Glaser, G. (2001). Reflections of a socialwork practitioner: Bridging the 19th and 21st centuries. Research in Social Work Practice, 11, 190-200.
14.
Hickman, L. (2004). On Hugh Miller on “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36, 496-499.
15.
Hildebrand, D. (2003). Beyond realism and antirealism: John Dewey and the neopragmatists. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
16.
Hildebrand, D. (2005). Pragmatism, neopragmatism, and public administration. Administration & Society, 37, 345-359
17.
Kaufman-Osborn, T. (1993). Teasing feminist sense from experience. Hypathia, 8, 124-145.
18.
Kyoki, B. (1993). The teaching of Buddha(Trans.). Tokyo: Society for the Promotion of Buddhism. (Original work published in 1966)
19.
Miller, H. T. (1994). Post-progressive public administration: Lessons from policy networks. Public Administration Review, 54, 378-386.
20.
Miller, H. T. (2000). Rationality, discourse, memetics & the autonomous liberal-humanist subject. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(3), 89-104.
21.
Miller, H. T. (2002a). Doubting foundationalism. Administrative & Society, 34, 336-342.
22.
Miller, H. T. (2002b). Situation-regarding intentionality. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24, 219-224.
23.
Miller, H. T. (2004a). The ideographic individual. Administrative Theory& Praxis, 26, 469-489.
24.
Miller, H. T. (2004b). Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade. Administration& Society, 36, 243-249.
25.
Miller, H. T. (2005). Residues of foundationalism in classical pragmatism. Administration& Society, 37, 360-374.
26.
Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration & Society, 32, 668-685.
27.
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin.
28.
Seigfried, C. (1996). Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
Shields, P. (1989). Freud, efficiency and pragmatism. Society, 26(2), 67-72.
30.
Shields, P. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35, 510-538.
Snider, K. (2000). Rethinking public administration's roots in pragmatism: The case of Charles A. Beard. American Review of Public Administration, 30, 123-145.
33.
Snider, K. (2005). Rorytan pragmatism: “Where's the beef” for public administration. Administration & Society, 37, 243-247.
34.
Stolcis, G. (2004). A view from the trenches: Comments on Miller's “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36, 362-368.
35.
Webb, J. (2004). Comment on Hugh T. Miller's “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36, 479-495.
36.
Webster's new collegiate dictionary(7th ed.). (1967). Springfield, MA: G. & C. Merriam.
