Burns, R. (2004) Poems and Songs of Robert Burns. Retrieved April 27, 2005, from http://www.bartleby.com/6/76.html.
2.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Dewey, J. (1960). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Capricorn.
4.
Dewey, J. (1981). The philosophy of John Dewey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Dewey, J. (1997). The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
6.
Evans, K. G. (2005). Upgrade or a different animal altogether?Administration & Society, 37(2), 248-255.
7.
Eco, U. (1985). “How culture conditions the colours we see.” In M. Blonsky (Ed.), On signs: A semiotics reader (pp. 157-175). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
8.
Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1998). Practices of the guild: A declaration of independence. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 20(2), 142-149.
10.
Hickman, L. A. (2004). On Hugh T. Miller on “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36(4), 496-499.
11.
Hofstadter, D. R. (1999). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books.
12.
Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
13.
Kloppenberg, J. (1988). Uncertain victory: Social democracy and progressivism in European and American thought, 1870-1920. London: Oxford University Press.
14.
Lindblom, C. E., & Woodhouse, E. J. (1993) The policy-making process (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
16.
Miller, H. T. (2004a). The ideographic individual. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 25(4), 2004.
17.
Miller, H. T. (2004b). Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade. Administration & Society, 36(2), 243-249.
18.
Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration & Society, 32(6), 668-685.
19.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Rorty, R. (1995). “Dewey between Hegel and Darwin.” In H. J. Saatkamp (Ed.), Rorty & pragmatism: The philosopher responds to his critics (pp. 1-15). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
21.
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.
22.
Saatkamp, H. J. (1995). Rorty and pragmatism: The philosopher responds to his critics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
23.
Shields, P. M. (2003). The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration. Administration & Society, 35(5), 510-538.
24.
Shields, P. M. (2004). Classical pragmatism: Engaging practitioner experience. Administration & Society, 36(3), 351-361.
25.
Snider, K. F. (2005). Rortyan pragmatism. Administration & Society, 37(2), 243-247.
26.
Stolcis, G. B. (2004). A view from the trenches: Comments on Miller’s “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36(3), 362-369.
27.
Webb, J. L. (2004). Comment on Hugh T. Miller’s “Why old pragmatism needs an upgrade.”Administration & Society, 36(4), 479-495.