The Agony of Choice

Abstract

Moral pluralism is fashionable. However, the implications of moral pluralism for the investment an agent is prepared to make in his practical thinking are potentially self-defeating. In the public realm, with its added responsibility, an examination of these implications is all the more important. This article argues that we shall only be in a position to subscribe to pluralism in practice if certain moral dispositions, such as the virtues, are already in place. Pluralism requires responsibly choosing, but this presupposes the courage or the truthfulness not to recoil from apparently rationally insoluble moral conflict.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aristotle. (1956). Nicomachean ethics(H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.

Berlin, I. (1969). Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty(pp. 118-172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Berlin, I. (1979). Against the current: Essays in the history of ideas. London: Hogarth Press.

Berlin, I., & Williams, B. A. O. (1994). Pluralism and liberalism: A reply. Political Studies, 41, 306-309.

Berlin, I. (1999). The roots of romanticism. London: Chatto & Windus.

Crowder, G. (1994). Pluralism and liberalism. Political Studies, 42, 293-305.

Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Galston, W. A. (1999). Value pluralism and liberal political theory. American Political Science Review, 93, 770-783.

Hampshire, S. (Ed.). (1978). Public and private morality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Hare, R. M. (1972). Rules of war and moral reasoning. Philosophy& Public Affairs, 1, 166-181.

11.

Ignatieff, M. (2000). Isaiah Berlin: A life. London: Vintage.

12.

Kekes, J. (1993). The morality of pluralism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

McDowell, J. H. (1995). Might there be external reasons? In J. E. J. Altham & R. Harrison (Eds.), World, mind, and ethics: Essays on the ethical philosophy of Bernard Williams(pp. 68-85). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Nagel, T. (1991). War and massacre. In Mortal questions(pp. 53-74). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

16.

Richardson, H. K. (1994). Practical reasoning about final ends. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Thompson, D. (1989). Political ethics and public office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

18.

Walzer, M. (1973). Political action: The problem of dirty hands. Philosophy& Public Affairs, 2, 160-180.

19.

Williams, B. A. O. (1978a). Politics and moral character. In S. Hampshire (Ed.), Public and private morality(pp. 55-74). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Williams, B. A. O. (1978b). Introduction. In I. Berlin (Ed.), Concepts and categories(pp. XI-XVIII). London: Hogarth Press.

21.

Williams, B. A. O. (1981). Moral luck. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Williams, B. A. O. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London: Fontana Press.

23.

Williams, B. A. O. (1995). Internal reasons and the obscurity of blame. In Making sense of humanity and other philosophical papers(pp. 35-45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Wollheim, R. (1984). The thread of life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Wollheim, R. (1993). The mind and its depths. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.