Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Scholars of public administration theory have been debating the merits of democratic administration and nascent forms of discourse for quite some time. Rather than coming to some synthesis, the discussion seems to be diverging into two competing factions, one that advocates egalitarian discussion for its own sake and the other that seeks to use discourse as a means to question the old view of “bureaucracy” and replace it with a consensus that leads to substantive results. This study provides a statistical analysis of discursive behavior in local military base redevelopment efforts, an example of interlocal cooperation, in support of the notion that discourse can facilitate tangible policy outcomes. Rather than attempting to subvert the synergistic spirit of discourse with “rationality,” this analysis simultaneously illustrates both the benefits and limitations of measurement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Farmer, D. (1995). The language of public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Fox, C. J., & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

General Accounting Office. (1998, December). Military bases: Status of prior base realignment and closure rounds (GAO/NSIAD-99-36). Washington, DC: Author.

Glassberg, A. (1995). Intergovernmental relations and base closing. Publius, 25(3), 87-89.

Hansen, K. N. (1998). Identifying facets of democratic administration: The empirical referents of discourse. Administration & Society, 30(4), 443-461.

Hansen, K. N., & Krejci, D. T. (2000). Rethinking neo-institutional interaction: Municipal arena-specific strategies and the base closure process. Administration & Society, 32(2), 166-182.

Hansen, K. N., Skopek, T. A., & Somma, M. S. (1997). The fundamentals of local policy implementation in military base redevelopment. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(4), 377-397.

Koven, S. (1992). Base closings and the politics-administration dichotomy revisited. Public Administration Review, 52(5), 526-533.

Mayer, K. (1995). Closing military bases (finally): Solving collective dilemmas through negotiation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20, 393-414.

10.

McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Miller, H. T. (1998). Method: The tail that wants to wag the dog. Administration & Society, 30(4), 462-470.

12.

Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2001). The epistemic community. Administration & Society, 32(6), 668-685.

13.

Sorenson, D. (1998). Downsizing the cold war: The politics of military base closure. New York: St. Martin's Press.

14.

Wamsley, G., & Wolf, J. (Eds.). (1996). Refounding democratic public administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

White, O. (1998). The ideology of technocratic empiricism and the discourse movement in contemporary public administration: A clarification. Administration & Society, 30(4), 471-476.

The Discourse Heresies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References