Spatial studies of political behavior have examined the structure of influential interests, yet there is little comprehensive, coherent, theory-based research of such influences on policy administration at the local and regional levels. Borrowing from the work of many scholars and integrating findings from across various subfields, this study identifies indicators for explaining the politics of area and administration. In particular; the author argues that the nature and degree of field office responsiveness depends on its place within the institutional structure, the congruence between organizational norms and societal expectations, areal effects arising from political context, and the structure of organized interests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashford, D. (1982). British dogmatism and French pragmatism: Central-local policymaking in the welfare state. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.
2.
Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
Bennett, R. (1998a). Assignment of competency and resources. In R. Bennett (Ed.), Territory and administration in Europe. New York: Pinter.
4.
Bennett, R. (1989b). Stimuli to administrative reform. In R. Bennett (Ed.), Territory and administration in Europe. New York: Pinter.
5.
Caldwell, L. K. (1982a). Alexander Hamilton: Advocate of executive leadership. In James W. Fesler (Ed.), American public administration: Patterns of the past (pp. 90-109). Washington: DC: American Society for Public Administration.
6.
Caldwell, L. K. (1982b). Thomas Jefferson and public administration. In James W. Fesler (Ed.), American public administration: Patterns of the past (pp. 71-89). Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.
7.
Carp, R. A., & Stidham, R. (1996). Judicial process in America (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
8.
Cater, D. (1964). Power in Washington. New York: Random House.
9.
Chubb, J. E. (1985). The political economy of federalism. American Political Science Review, 79, 994-1015.
10.
Civil Service Reform Act. (1978). P.L. 95-454, 91 Stat. 1111.
11.
Conover, P.J. (1986, April). Group identification and group sympathy: Their political implications. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.
12.
Conover, P.J., & Feldman, S. (1984).Group identification: Values, and the nature of political beliefs. American Politics Quarterly, 12, 151-175.
13.
Considine, M., & Lewis, J. (1999).Governance at ground level: The frontline bureaucrat in the age of markets and networks. Public Administration Review, 59, 467-480.
14.
Daniel, C. (1992).Constitutionalizing merit? Practical implications of Elrod, Branti, and Rutan. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 12, 26-34.
15.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.
16.
Durant, R. F. (1995).Public policy, overhead democracy, and the professional state revisited. Administration and Society, 27, 165-202.
17.
Durant, R. F. (1998).Agenda setting, the `third wave', and the administrative state. Administration and Society, 30, 211-247.
18.
Eisner, M. A., & Meier, K. J. (1990). Presidential control versus bureaucratic power: Explaining the Reagan revolution in antitrust. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 269-287.
19.
Elazar, D. (1970). Cities of the prairie. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Elazar, D. (1984). American federalism: The view from the states (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
21.
Elmore, R. (1985). Forward and backward mapping: Reversible logic in the analysis of public policy. In K. Hanf & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems (pp. 33-70). Boston: Nijhoff.
22.
Erikson, R. S., McIver, J. P., & Wright, G. C. (1987).State political culture and public opinion. American Political Science Review, 81, 797-813.
23.
Erikson R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1989). Political parties, public opinion, and state policy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 83, 729-750.
24.
Feldman, S. (1988).Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
25.
Fesler, J. W. (1949). Area and administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
26.
Fesler, J. W. (1965).Approaches to the understanding of decentralization. Journal of Politics, 27, 536-566.
27.
Fesler, J. W. (1983).Politics, policy, and bureaucracy at the top. Annals of APPSS, 466, 23-41.
28.
Freedman, A. (1988).Doing battle with the patronage army: Politics, courts, and personnel administration in Chicago. Public Administration Review, 48, 847-859.
29.
Friedrich, C. (1963). Man and his government. New York: McGraw Hill.
30.
Gais, T. L., Peterson, M. A., & Walker, J. L. (1984). Interest groups, iron triangles, and representative institutions in American national government. British Journal of Political Science, 14, 161-185.
31.
Gerber, B., & Teske, P. (2000).Regulatory policymaking in the American states: A review of theories and evidence. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 849-886.
32.
Goldman, S., & Lamb, C. (Eds.). (1985). Judicial conflict and consensus: Behavioral studies of American appellate courts. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
33.
Grodzins, M. (1963). Centralization and decentralization in the American federal system. In R. A. Goldwin (Ed.), A nation of states. Chicago: Rand McNally.
34.
Hamill, R., & Lodge, M. (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 69-94). Hillsdale, New York: Erlbaum.
35.
Hamm, K. (1983). Patterns of influence among committees, agencies, and interest groups. Legislative Quarterly, 8, 379-426.
36.
Hansen, W., Johnson, R., & Unah, I. (1995).Specialized courts, bureaucratic agencies, and the politics of U.S. trade policy. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 529-557.
37.
Heclo, H. (1975). OMB and the presidency—The problem of neutral competence. The Public Interest, 38, 80-98.
38.
Heclo, H. (1977). A government of strangers: Executive politics in Washington. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39.
Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system (pp. 87-124). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
40.
Hedge, D. M. (1993).A spatial model of regulation. American Politics Quarterly, 21, 387-409.
41.
Hedge, D. M., Menzel, D. C., & Krause, M. A. (1989).The intergovernmental milieu and street-level implementation. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 285-299.
42.
Hedge, D. M., & Scicchitano, M. J. (1992).Devolving regulatory authority: The federal and state response. Policy Studies Review, 11, 81-90.
43.
Heinz, J. E., Laumann, E., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core, private interests in national policy making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Hoogenboom, A. A. (1961). Outlawing the spoils: A history of the civil service reform movement, 1965-1883. Urbana: University of Illinois.
45.
Horwitz, R. (1994).Judicial review of regulatory decisions: The changing criteria. Political Science Quarterly, 109, 133-169.
46.
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1993). Citizens, contexts, and politics. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline II (pp. 281-304). Washington: DC: American Political Science Association.
47.
Ingraham, P. W., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (1990). Political foundations of the American federal service: Rebuilding a crumbling base. Public Administration Review, 50, 210-219.
Kaufman, H. (1956). Emerging conflicts in the doctrines of public administration. American Political Science Review, 50, 1057-1073.
50.
Kaufman, H. (1960). The forest ranger. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
51.
Kaufman, H. (1969). Administrative decentralization and political power. Public Administration Review, 29, 3-15.
52.
Kelly, H. (1965). Two functions of reference groups. In H. Proshansky & B. Seidenberg (Eds.), Basic studies in social psychology (pp. 210-214). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
53.
Kelly, M. (1994).Theories of justice and street level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 119-140.
54.
Key, V. O. (1949). Southern politics. New York: Knopf.
55.
Key, V. O. (1956). American state politics. New York: Knopf.
56.
Kohfeld, C. W., & Sprague, J. (1990).Demography, police behavior, and deterrence. Criminology, 28, 111-136.
57.
Kroeger, N. (1975). Bureaucracy, social exchange, and benefits received in a public assistance agency. Social Problems, 23, 182-196.
58.
Kunstler, J. H. (1996, September). Home from nowhere. Atlantic Monthly, 278(3), 43-66.
59.
Lane, J.-E. (1993). The public sector, concepts, models, and approaches. London: Sage.
60.
Lipsky, M. (1968). Standing the study of policy implementation on its head. In W. D. Burnham & M. W. Weinberg (Eds.), American politics and public policy (pp. 391-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
62.
Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., Conover, P. J., Feldman, S., & Miller, A. H. (1985).Where is the schema? Critiques. American Political Science Review, 85, 1358-1380.
63.
Lowi, T. (1964).American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677-715.
64.
Lowi, T. (1972).Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298-310.
65.
Lowi, T. (1979). The end of liberalism (2nd ed.) New York: Norton.
66.
March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1983).Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. American Political Science Review, 77, 281-296.
67.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1980). A multivariate model of public policy making. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 439-493.
68.
McCubbins, M., & Schwartz, T. (1984).Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols and fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science, 28, 165-179.
69.
McKinney, L. (1997).Technical complexity, regionalism, and decision-making: Case processing outcomes in EPA's toxic substances program. Social Science Journal, 35, 377-392.
70.
Melnick, R. S. (1983). Regulation and the courts: The case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
71.
Mintzberg, H. (1996, May-June).Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 75-83.
72.
Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The political economy of regulation. New York: Columbia University Press.
73.
Moe, T. M. (1980). The organization of interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
Moe, T. M. (1985a).Control and feedback in economic regulations: The case of the NLRB. American Political Science Review, 79, 1094-1116.
75.
Moe, T. M. (1985b). The politicized presidency. In J. E. Chubb & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), New directions in American politics (pp. 235-271). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
76.
Moe, T. M. (1987).Interests, institutions, and positive theory: The politics of the NLRB. Studies of American Political Development, 2, 236-299.
77.
Niskanen, W. A. (1979). Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
78.
O'Connell, L. (1991).Investigators at work: How bureaucratic and legal constraints influence the enforcement of discrimination law. Public Administration Review, 51, 123-130.
79.
O'Leary, R. (1993). Environmental change, federal courts and the EPA. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
80.
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American's policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
81.
Peters, B. G. (1993, August). Neutral competence in the civil service: Problems of performance and accountability. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Washington, DC.
82.
Pressman, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1979). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
83.
Rasinski, K. A. (1987). What's fair is fair—Or is it? Value differences underlying public views about social justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 201-211.
84.
Reagan, M. D. (1987). Regulation: The politics of policy. Boston: Little Brown.
85.
Richardson, R. J., & Vines, K. N. (1970). The politics of federal courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
86.
Romzek, B. S. (1997). Accountability challenges of deregulation. In C. Ban & N. M. Riccucci (Eds.), Public personnel management (2nd ed., pp. 35-54). New York: Addison Wesley.
87.
Rondinelli, D. (1981).Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47, 133-145.
88.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (1971). Federal service and the Constitution: The development of the public employment relationship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
89.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219-227.
90.
Rosenbloom, D. (2000).Retrofitting the administrative state to the constitution: Congress and the judiciary's twentieth-century progress. Public Administration Review, 60, 39-46.
91.
Sabatier, P. (1975).Social movements and regulatory agencies: Toward a more adequate—and less pessimistic—theory of clientele capture. Policy Sciences, 6, 301-342.
92.
Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy-coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
93.
Sabatier, P., Loomis, J., & McCarthy, C. (1995).Hierarchical controls, professional norms, local communities, and budget maximization: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service planning decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 204-242.
94.
Salisbury, R. (1993, August). Must all politics be local: Spatial attachments and the politics of place. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Washington, DC.
95.
Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
96.
Schlozman, K. L., & Tierney, J. T. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper-Row.
97.
Schmidt, D. E. (1991). Partisan changes in the NLRB. Labor Law Journal, 42, 484-490.
98.
Schmidt, D. E. (1994a). NLRB regional office decision-making: Independence, partisanship, and caseloads. American Review of Public Administration, 24, 133-147.
99.
Schmidt, D. E. (1994b, August). Responsive competence, reciprocal causality, and politicization of the NLRB regional offices. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, New York.
100.
Schmidt, D.E. (2002). Politicization and responsiveness in the regional offices of the NLRB. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 188-215.
101.
Schmidt, D.E., & McKinney, L. (1993, August). Hierarchical models of decision-making in the EPA and the NLRB: Towards a theory of agency responsiveness to political pressure. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association meeting, Washington, DC.
102.
Schmitter, P.C., & Lanzalaco, L. (1989). Regions and the organization of business interests. In W.D. Coleman & H.J. Jacek (Eds.), Regionalism, business interests, and public policy (pp. 201-230). London: European University Institute.
103.
Schneider, S. (1992). Governmental response to disasters: The conflict between bureaucratic procedures and emergent norms. Public Administration Review, 52, 135-145.
104.
Scholz, J. T. (1984). Reliability, responsiveness, and regulatory policy. Public Administration Review, 44, 145-153.
105.
Scholz, J. T., Twombly, J., & Headrick, B. (1991). Street level political controls over federal bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 829-850.
106.
Scholz, J. T., & Wei, F.-H. (1986). Regulatory enforcement in a federalist system. American Political Science Review, 80, 1249-1270.
107.
Scholz, J., & Wood, D. (1998). Controlling the IRS: Principals, principles, and public administration. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 141-162.
108.
Scott, P. (1997). Assessing determinants of bureaucratic discretion: An experiment in street-level decision-making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 35-37.
109.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
110.
Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grassroots. Berkeley: University of California Press.
111.
Simon, H. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review, 79, 293-304.
112.
Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
113.
Stein, R., & Bickers, K. (1995). Perpetuating the pork barrel: Policy subsystems and American democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114.
Stewart, R. B. (1981). The reformation of American administrative law. Harvard Law Review, 88, 1713-1733.
115.
Stimson, J. A. (1991). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.
116.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1990). Information and organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
117.
Strauss, P. L. (1984). The place of agencies in government: Separation of powers and the fourth branch. Columbia Law Review, 84, 573-669.
118.
Thomas, C. S., & Hrebenar, R. J. (1992). Changing patterns of interest group activity: A regional perspective. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interests (pp. 150-174). San Francisco: Westview.
119.
Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. American Political Science Review, 77, 390-406.
120.
Waterman, R. W. (1989). Presidential influence and the administrative state. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
121.
White, L. G. (1989). Public management in a pluralist arena. Public Administration Review, 49, 522-532.
122.
Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. In J. Q. Wilson (Ed.), The politics of regulation (pp. 357-394). New York: Basic Books.
123.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government does and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
124.
Wise, C. R. (1990). Public service configurations and public organizations: Public organization design in the post-privatization era. Public Administration Review, 50, 141-145.
125.
Wood, B. D. (1992). Modeling federal implementation as a system: The clean air case. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 40-67.
126.
Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 801-828.
127.
Wright, D. S. (1990). Federalism, intergovernmental management, historical reflections, and conceptual comparisons. Public Administration Review, 50, 168-178.
128.
Zehner, Z. (1999). Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod v FCC: The end of judicial deference to FCC decision-making. Administrative Law Review, 51, 683-701.
129.
Zimmerman, J. (1995). State-local relations: A partnership approach (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
