September 11: Public Administration and the Study of Crises and Crisis Management

Abstract

This article applies new insights in the study of crises and crisis management to the case of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Such new insights include the notion of crisis as process, the transnational dimensions of contemporary crises, the politization of crises, the increasing importance of the media, and the revision of some conventional wisdoms of crisis management. The article pays specific attention to the role of public officials and public agencies. It explores the contributions they made in the immediate response to the crisis as well as in the subsequent periods. It is stressed that the sheer inconceivability of September 11 may indicate the risk of totally new threats. With the possible exception of the intelligence community, September 11 has fostered the reputation of public administration. This will put extra pressure on public officials and their agencies to avert and effectively cope with new threats.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arquilla, J., & Ronfeldt, D. (Eds.). (2001). Networks and netwars: The future of terror, crime, and militancy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Carter, A. B., Deutsch, J., & Zelikow, P. (1998). Catastrophic terrorism: Tackling the new danger. Foreign Affairs, 77(6), 80-94.

Comfort, L. K. (Ed.). (1988). Managing disaster: Strategies and policy perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Dror, Y. (2001). The capacity to govern. London: Frank Cass.

Dror, Y., Lagadec, P., Porfiriev, B., & Quarantelli, E. L. (2001). Crises to come. In U. Rosenthal, R. Boin, & L. K. Comfort (Eds.), Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities (pp. 342-349). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

Garnett, J. L., & Kouzmin, A. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of administrative communication. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Giuliani, R. W. (2002). Leadership. New York: Hyperion.

Goodsell, C. T. (2002). Insights for public administration from the terrorist attacks. Administration & Society, 34, 255-260.

Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Langewiesche, W. (2002). American ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center. New York: North Point Press.

11.

Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

12.

Petak, W. J. (Ed.). (1985). Special issue on emergency management [Special issue]. Public Administration Review, 45(1).

13.

Powers, T. (2002). Secrets of September 11. New York Review of Books, 49(15), 47-52.

14.

Quarantelli, E. L. (1978). Some basic themes in sociological studies of disasters. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), Disasters: Theory and research (pp. 1-14). London: Sage.

15.

Quarantelli, E. L. (Ed.). (1998). What is a disaster? Perspectives on the question. London: Routledge.

16.

Rosenthal, U. (2001). Shifting identities: The reconstructive mode of the Bijlmer plane crash. In U. Rosenthal, R. Boin, & L. K. Comfort (Eds.), Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities (pp. 200-215). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

17.

Rosenthal, U., Hart't, P., & Kouzmin, A. (1993). The bureau-politics of crisis management. Public Administration, 69, 211-233.

18.

Stillman, R. J., II. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin's.

19.

Sylves, R. T., & Waugh, W. L., Jr. (Eds.). (1990). Cities and disasters: North American studies in emergency management. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

20.

Waugh, W. L., Jr. (1990). Terrorism and emergency management. New York: Marcel Dekker.

21.

Zelizer, B., & Allan, S. (Eds.). (2002). Journalism after September 11. London: Routledge.