To what extent do national forest policy decisions reflect a balance between the interests of environmentalists and the timber industries? National forest policy making from 1960 through 1995 was analyzed using the advocacy coalition framework developed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith. The authors found that forest policy shifted in a more ecologically sensitive direction beginning in the late 1980s. Changes were largely attributable to the ability of the environmental coalition to manipulate new information to influence key decision makers within Congress and to take advantage of more favorable decisional venues to overcome structural biases built into existing forest policy-making arrangements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allin, C. (1982). The politics of wilderness preservation. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
2.
Baumgartner, F. , & Jones, B. (1991, November). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53.
3.
Browne, W. P. (1988). Private interests, public policy, and American agriculture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
4.
Clary, D. (1986). Timber and the Forest Service. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
5.
Cortner, H. , & Schweitzer, D. (1993). Below-cost timber sales and the political marketplace. Environmental Management, 17(1).
6.
Culhane, P. (1981). Public lands politics: Interest group influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Dana, S. , & Fairfax, S. (1980). Forest and range policy (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Davis, C. , & Ellison, B. (1996). Change on the range?Society and Natural Resources, 9(4).
9.
Dietrich, W. (1992). The final forest. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Endangered Species Act, 87 Stat. 884 (1973).
11.
Fairfax, S. (1987). Interstate bargaining over revenue sharing and payments in lieu of taxes: Federalism as if states mattered. In P. O. Foss (Ed.), Federal lands policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
12.
Farnham, T. J. , & Mohai, P. (1995, Summer). National forest timber management over the past decade: A change in emphasis for the Forest Service?Policy Studies Journal, 23.
Freeman, J. L. (1955). The political process. New York: Random House.
15.
Gericke, K. , & Sullivan, J. (1994, March-April). Public participation and appeals of Forest Service plans—An empirical examination. Society and Natural Resources, 7.
16.
Hirt, P. (1994). A conspiracy of optimism. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
Hoberg, G. (1997). From localism to legalism: The transformation of federal forest policy. In C. Davis (Ed.), Western public lands and environmental politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Ingram, H. (1990). Water politics. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
19.
Jones, E. S. , & Callaway, W. (1995, Summer). Neutral bystander, intrusive micromanager, or useful catalyst? The role of Congress in effecting change within the Forest Service. Policy Studies Journal, 23.
20.
Jones, E. S. , & Taylor, C. P. (1995, Summer). Litigating agency change: The impact of the courts and administrative appeals process on the Forest Service. Policy Studies Journal, 23.
21.
Klyza, C. M. (1996). Reform at a geological pace: Mining policy on the federal lands. In C. Davis (Ed.), Western public lands and environmental politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22.
Knudson-Vandenberg Act, 46 Stat. 527 (1930).
23.
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 687-691.
24.
Multiple Use and Sustained Yield Act, 74 Stat. 215 (1960).
25.
National Forest Management Act, 90 Stat. 2849 (1976).
26.
O’Toole, R. (1988). Reforming the Forest Service. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 13(2).
27.
Sabatier, P. A. , & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview.
28.
Sabatier, P. A. , Loomis, J., & McCarthy, C. (1995, February). Hierarchical controls, professional norms, local constituencies, and budget maximization: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service planning decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 39.
29.
Steen, H. (1976). The U.S. Forest Service: A history. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
30.
Thurber, J. A. (1991). Dynamics of policy subsystems in American politics. In A. Cigler & B. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
31.
U.S. Department of Agriculture . (1965). Report of the chief of the Forest Service,1964 (p. 2). Washington, DC: Author.
32.
Wenner, L. M. (1993). The courts in environmental politics: The case of the spotted owl. In Z. Smith (Ed.), Environmental politics and policy in the West. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
33.
West Virginia Division of the Izaac Walton League v. Butz, 522 F. 2nd 945 (4th Cir. 1975).
34.
Wilderness Act, 78 Stat. 890 (1964).
35.
Wilkinson, C. (1992). Crossing the next meridian: Land, water, and the future of the West. Washington, DC: Island.
36.
Yaffee, S. (1994). The wisdom of the spotted owl. Washington, DC: Island.
