This article reviews the concept of cultural governance. Three cases of cultural governance are examined including the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) in Colorado, the Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District (MZPMD) in Missouri, and the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in Pennsylvania. This study shows that cultural governance has emerged as an innovative and effective institutional and financial arrangement that supports local and regional cultural activities. It also suggests that the successful performance of cultural governance relies on strategic coalitions between cultural stake-holders, healthy city-county partnerships, and stable funding mechanisms.
Colorado Business Committee for the Arts . (1999). The economic and social impacts of the arts in metro Denver: Executive summary. Denver, CO: Author.
4.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International . (1997). Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District: Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 and independent auditors’ report. St. Louis, MO: Author.
5.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International . (1999). Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District: Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 and independent auditors’ report. St. Louis, MO: Author.
6.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International . (2000). Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District: Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and independent auditors’ report. St. Louis, MO: Author.
7.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu International . (2001). Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District: Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and independent auditors’ report. St. Louis, MO: Author.
8.
Frost-Kumpf, H. (1998). Cultural districts: The art as a strategy for revitalizing our cities. Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts.
9.
Greiner, L. E. (1967). Patterns of organizational change. Harvard Business Review, 45, 119-128.
10.
Hansberry, J. (2000). Denver’s Scientific and Cultural Facilities District: A case study in regionalism. Government Finance Review, 16, 13-16.
11.
Hays, T. (1999, September 28). Art funding a hot topic. The Denver Post, p. 4A.
12.
Levy, A. H. (1997). Government and the arts. New York: University Press of America.
13.
Martin, R. (1999). Beyond privatization? The art and society of labor, citizenship, and consumerism. Social Text, 17, 35-48.
14.
McCarthy, M. (1999). Denver forges cultural history: The scientific and cultural facilities district. Unpublished report, Scientific and Cultural Facilities District, Denver, CO.
15.
Metropolitan Zoological Park and Museum District . (1997). Silver anniversary-1997. St. Louis, MO: Author.
16.
National Endowment for the Arts . (2000). The National Endowment for the Arts 1965-2000: A brief chronology of federal support for the arts. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
Pfeffer, J. , & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependent perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Rainey, H. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (1991). 1989-1990 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
20.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (1992). 1990-1991 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
21.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (1993). 1992 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
22.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (1994). 1993 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
23.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (1998). 1997-1998 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
24.
The Scientific and Cultural Facilities District . (2000). 1999 annual report. Denver, CO: Author.
25.
Turner, J. (1995). The Allegheny Regional Asset District: Communities thinking and acting like a region. Government Finance Review, 11, 19-22.
26.
Ulrich, D. , & Barney, J. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9, 471-481.
27.
U.S. Census Bureau . (1999). Government organizations: 1997 census of government (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. [Available online: http://www.census.gov/govs/www/gid.html]
28.
U.S. House . (1994). Kansas and Missouri metropolitan culture district compact. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
29.
Wallis, A. (1993). Governance and the civic infrastructure of metropolitan regions. National Civic Review, 82, 125-139.
30.
Wallis, A. (1994). Evolving structures and challenges of metropolitan region. National Civic Review, 83, 40-53.
31.
Wyszomirski, M. J. (1995a). From accord to discord: Arts policy during and after the culture wars. In K. Mulcahy & M. J. Wyszomirski (Eds.), America’s commitment to culture: Government and the art (pp. 1-46). Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
Wyszomirski, M. J. (1995b). The politics of arts policy: Subgovernment to issue network. In K. Mulcahy & M. J. Wyszomirski (Eds.), America’s commitment to culture: Government and the arts (pp. 47-76). Boulder, CO: Westview.
33.
Yudice, G. (1999). The privatization of culture. Social Text, 17, 17-34.
