Earlier evaluations of Ameri Corps have approached the study of program effects in two general ways. Cost-benefit studies indicate that in select projects the program produces a substantial net benefit. Qualitative studies conclude that the program has a substantial impact on the strength of communities, provides an influx of social capital, and solves unmet human needs. The authors’ analysis focuses on the impact of Ameri Corps on the volunteer members. In a 2-year preservice-postservice analysis they found that the members become more active in community groups. Ameri Corps participation may strengthen social capital—participation parallels a significant value shift among participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aguirre International . (1996). Making a difference: Impact of Ameri Corps*State/National direct on members and communities 1994-1995 and 1995-1996. San Mateo, CA: Author.
2.
Barber, B. (1988). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Barber, J. (1995). Searching for civil society. National Civic Review, 84(2), 114-118.
4.
Bellah, R. , Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Bellah, R. , Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1992). The good society. New York: Knopf.
6.
Bobo, L. , & Gilliam, F. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and Black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377-393.
7.
Capella, J. , & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Chrislip, D. (1995). Pulling together: Creating a constituency for change. National Civic Review, 84(1), 21-29.
9.
Chrislip, D. , & Larson, C. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95-S120.
11.
Corporation for National Service . (1997). VISTA project directory. Washington, DC: Author.
12.
Corporation for National Service . (2000). A brief history of Ameri Corps. Retrieved from http://www.americorps.org/research/history.html
13.
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
DeLeon, P. (1997). Democracy and the policy sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
de Tocqueville, A. (1958). Democracy in America. New York: Mentor Books. (Original work published 1835)
16.
DiRienzo, H. (1995). Beyond the melting pot: Preserving culture, building community. National Civic Review, 84(1), 5-15.
17.
Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community. New York: Crown Press.
18.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
19.
Gallup Organization . (2000). Military number one in public confidence. HMO’s last. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com
20.
Garcia, I. (1998, December 8). Restorative powers: 14 Ameri Corps volunteers find satisfaction in parkland repairs. Los Angeles Times, p.1.
21.
General Accounting Office . (2000). National service programs: Two Ameri Corps programs’ funding and benefits (Report No. HEHS-00-33). Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Kelling, G. , & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our neighborhoods. New York: Kessler Books.
23.
Kelly, D. (1993, December 2). Launching national service policy. USA Today, p.7D.
24.
Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
25.
Lipsky, M. (1992). Street level bureaucracy. In J. Shafritz & A. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (2nd ed., pp. 476-484). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26.
McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Milton, C. (1994). Principles for high quality national service programs. Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
28.
Monroe, K. (1996). The heart of altruism: Perceptions of a common humanity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
Neumann, G. (1995). The benefits and costs of national service: Methods for benefit assessment with application to three Ameri Corps programs. San Francisco: James Irvine Foundation.
30.
Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575-586.
31.
Perry, J. , & Thompson, A. (1997). Building communities through Ameri Corps. Bloomington, IN: School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
32.
Perry, J. , Thompson, A., Tschirhart, M., Mesch, D., & Lee, G. (1999). Inside a Swiss army knife: An assessment of Ameri Corps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(2), 225-250.
33.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664-667.
35.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
37.
Rokeach, M. , & Ball-Rokeach, S. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities: 1968-1981. American Psychologist, 27, 155-171.
38.
Schorr, L. (1997). Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Anchor Books.
39.
Selingo, J. (1998, September 25). Ameri Corps at 5 years: A success but not in the way Clinton hoped. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(5), A38.
40.
Shumer, R. , & Matland, C. (1995). Youth works/AmeriCorps: First year report. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Vocational and Technical Education.
41.
Shumer, R. , & Matland, C. (1996). Youth works/Ameri Corps: Second year report. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Vocational and Technical Education.
42.
Shumer, R. , & Rentel, K. (1997). Youth works/Ameri Corps: Third year report. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Department of Vocational and Technical Education.
Suttle, G. (1998, May 3). Volunteers spruce up Tacoma neighborhoods: More than 100 turn out to clean up and brighten up a dozen locations throughout the city. The News Tribune, p. B6.
45.
Turner, J. (1997, September 29). Helping hands: Ameri Corps volunteers were there when needed. The Seattle Times, p.B3.
46.
van Deth, J. , & Searbrough, E. (1995). Perspectives on value change. In J. van Deth & E. Searbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 527-540). London: Oxford University Press.
47.
Ventriss, C. (1989). Toward a public philosophy of public administration: A civic perspective on the public. Public Administration Review, 42(2), 173-179.
48.
Verba, S. , & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.
49.
Waldman, S. (1995). The bill: How the adventures of Clinton’s National Service Bill reveal what is corrupt, comical, cynical—and noble—about Washington. New York: Viking Press.
50.
Wang, C. , Owens, T., & Kim, K. (1995). A cost-and-benefit study of two Ameri Corps projects in the state of Washington. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
51.
Wellman, B. , & Wortley, S. (1990). Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558-588.
52.
Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judgment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
