The 1990s debate on postmodernism as a metatheoretical basis for American public administration is reviewed based on its progress over time. Important themes in the debates are social constructivism and anti-foundationalism; deconstruction and narrative and linguistic analysis; pragmatism; and quantum theory. Considerable differences exist between the participants, and strictly speaking, there are rather few true postmodernists, but there is a large group of theorists who share a strong skepticism for the generalizing type of theory and instead recommend more situational analysis. Most of these theorists are pragmatists with a strong interest in public administration as an instrument to achieve a better society on the basis of democratic participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, U. , Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
2.
Berger, P. , & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
3.
Bogason, P. (1999). Public administration and the unspeakable: Postmodernism as an academic trail of the 1990s. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University, Department of Social Science. Available: http://www.ssc.ruc.dk/Research/workingpapersmain.htm
4.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1, 57-59.
5.
Dennard, L. F. (1997a). The democratic potential in the transition of postmodernism. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 148-162.
6.
Dennard, L. F. (1997b). A symmetry break: The ethics of a bifurcation in the sciences. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(3), 380-394.
7.
Durkheim, E. (1965). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
8.
Evans, K. G. (1997). Imagining anticipatory government: A speculative essay on quantum theory and visualization. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(3), 355-367.
9.
Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration. Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
10.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1, 128-133.
11.
Farmer, D. J. (1997). Derrida, deconstruction, and public administration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 12-27.
12.
Farmer, D. J. (1998a). Introduction: Listening to other voices. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.), Papers on the art of anti-administration (pp. 1-10). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
13.
Farmer, D. J. (Ed.). (1998b). Papers on the art of anti-administration. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
14.
Farmer, D. J. (1998c). Public administration discourse as play with a purpose. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.), Papers on the art of anti-administration (pp. 37-56). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
15.
Farmer, D. J. (1994/1998d). Social construction of concepts: The case of efficiency. In D. J. Farmer (Ed.), Papers on the art of anti-administration (pp. 95-111). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
16.
Fischer, F. (1989). Technocracy and the politics of expertise: Managerial and policy perspectives. London: Sage.
17.
Fox, C. D. , C. J.? & Cochran, C. E. (1990). Discretionary public administration: Toward a platonic guardian class? In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 87-112). London: Sage.
18.
Fox, C. J. (1993). Alternatives to orthodoxy: Constitutionalism, communitarianism and discourse. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 15(2), 52-70.
19.
Fox, C. J. , & Miller, H. T. (1993). Postmodern public administration: A short treatise on self-referential epihenomena. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 15(1), 1-17.
20.
Fox, C. J. , & Miller, H. T. (1995). Postmodern public administration: Towards discourse. London: Sage.
21.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1, 100-108.
22.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1.
23.
Geuras, D. , & Garofolo, C. (1996). The normative paradox in contemporary public administration theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 18(2, 2-13.
24.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
25.
Gillroy, J. M. (1997). Postmodernism, efficiency and comprehensive policy argument in Public administration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 163-190.
26.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1, 97-100.
27.
Harmon, M. (1990). The responsible actor as “tortured soul”: The case of Horatio Hornblower. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 151-180). London: Sage.
28.
Harmon, M. M. (1995). Responsibility as paradox: A critique of rational discourse on government. London: Sage.
29.
Harmon, M. M. (1997). On the futility of universalism. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(2), 3-18.
30.
Hummel, R. P. (1990). Circle managers and pyramidal managers: Icons for the post-modern public administrator. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 202-218). London: Sage.
31.
Jun, J. S. (1994). On administrative praxis. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 16(2), 201-207.
32.
Jun, J. S. (1997). Interpretive and critical perspectives: An introduction. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(2), 146-153.
33.
Jun, J. S. , & Rivera, M. A. (1997). The paradox of transforming public administration. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 132-147.
34.
Kass, H. D. (1990). Stewardship as a fundamental element in images of public administration. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 113-131). London: Sage.
35.
Kass, H. D. , & Catron, B. (Eds.). (1990). Images and identities in public administration. London: Sage.
36.
King, C. S. , & Stivers, C. (1998). Government is us: Public administration in anti-government era. London: Sage.
37.
Kouzmin, A. , & Leivesley, R. (1997). Ethics in U.S. public administration: Self-arrested or castrated agency?—A rejoinder. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(1), 92-98.
38.
Marshall, G. S. , & White, O. F. (1990). The Blacksburg Manifesto and the postmodern debate: Public administration in a time without a name. American Review of Public Administration, 20(2), 61-76.
39.
Administrative Theory & Praxis, 1, 109-116.
40.
McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: A discourse analysis. London: Sage.
41.
Mesaros, W. , & Balfour, D. L. (1993). Hermeneutics, scientific realism, and social research: Towards a unifying paradigm for public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 15(2), 25-36.
42.
Miller, H. T. (1993). Everyday politics in public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 23(2), 96-116.
43.
Miller, H. T. , & Fox, C. J. (Eds.). (1996). Postmodernism, “Reality” and Public Administration: A discourse. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
44.
Miller, H. T. , & King, C. S. (1998). Practical theory. American Review of Public Administration, 28(1), 43-60.
45.
Morcöl, G. (1997). A meno paradox for public administration: Have we acquired a radically new knowledge for the “new sciences”?Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(3), 305-317.
46.
Morgan, D. F. (1990). Administrative phronesis: Discretion and the problem of administrative legitimacy in our constitutional system. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 67-86). London: Sage.
47.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. London: Sage.
48.
Overman, S. E. (1996). The new sciences of administration: Chaos and quantum theory. Public Administration Review, 56(5), 487-491.
49.
Rivera, M. A. , & Woller, G. M. (Eds.). (2000). Public administration in a new era: Postmodern and critical. Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
50.
Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach. London: Routledge.
52.
Snider, K. (1998). Living pragmatism: The case of Mary Parker Follett. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 274-286.
53.
Spicer, M. W. (1997). Public administration, the state, and the postmodern condition: A constitutionalist perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(1), 90-102.
54.
Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox and political reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
55.
Tennert, J. R. (1998). Who cares about big questions? The search for the holy grail in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(2), 231-243.
56.
VrMeer, R. W. (1994). Postmodernism: A polemic commentary on continuity and discontinuity in contemporary thought. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 16(1), 85-91.
57.
Wamsley, G. L. , Bacher, R. N., Goodsell, C. T., Kronenberg, P. S., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
Wamsley, G. L. , & Wolf, J. F. (1996). Introduction: Can a high-modern project find happiness in a postmodern era? In G. L. Wamsley & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Refounding democratic public administration: Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges (pp. 1-37). London: Sage.
59.
White, J. D. (1992). Knowledge development and use in public administration: Views from postpositivism, poststructuralism and postmodernism. In M. T. Bailey & R. T. Mayer (Eds.), Public management in an interconnected world (pp. 159-176). New York: Greenwood.
60.
White, J. D. (1992). Taking language seriously: Toward a narrative theory of knowledge for administrative research. American Review of Public Administration, 22(2), 75-88.
61.
White, O. F. , & McSwain, C. J. (1990). The Phoenix project: Raising a new image of public administration of the past. In H. D. Kass & B. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 23-59). London: Sage.
62.
White, O. F. , & McSwain, C. J. (1993). The semiotic way of knowing and public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 15(1), 18-35.
63.
Zanetti, L. A. , & Carr, A. (1997). Putting critical theory to work: Giving the public administrator the critical edge. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 19(2), 208-224.
