What do exemplary qualitative accounts look like, and how do they convince readers of their correctness? What sort of standards can be used to assess qualitative research accounts for public administration? To address these questions, the authors examined 72 recent qualitative research journal articles. Proceeding from a set of preliminary guidelines, they worked iteratively between articles and the emergent template to produce refined guidelines. In addition, they identified specific types of dilemmas for public bureaucracies and policies that trigger researchers’ strategies for persuading readers that their qualitative accounts are credible. They conclude with four actionable recommendations for improving the field’s qualitative research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. B. , & White, J. D. (1994). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality. Public Administration Review, 54, 565-576.
2.
Aufrecht, S. E. , & Li, S. B. (1995). Reform with Chinese characteristics: The context of Chinese civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 55, 175-182.
3.
Bailey, M. T. (1992). Do physicists use case studies? Thoughts on public administration research. Public Administration Review, 52, 47-55.
4.
Barzelay, M. (1993). The single case study as intellectually ambitious inquiry. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 305-318.
5.
Berger, P. L. , & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
6.
Bigelow, B. , & Stone, M. M. (1995). Why don’t they do what we want? An exploration of organizational responses and institutional pressures in community health centers. Public Administration Review, 55, 183-192.
7.
Brower, R. S. , & Abolafia, M. Y. (1996). Procedural entrepreneurship: Enacting alternative channels to administrative effectiveness. American Review of Public Administration, 26, 287-308.
8.
Burger, T. (1987). Max Weber’s theory of concept formation: History, laws, and ideal types. Durham, NC: Duke University.
9.
Burrell, G. , & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
10.
Clough, P. T. (1992). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Coser, L. A. (1971). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich.
12.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Daneke, G. A. (1990). A science of public administration?Public Administration Review, 50, 383-392.
15.
Denzin, N. K. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Domahidy, M. R. , & Gilsinan, J. F. (1992). The back stage is not the back room: How spatial arrangements affect the administration of public affairs. Public Administration Review, 52, 588-593.
17.
Feldman, M. S. (1995). Strategies for interpreting qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Forrester, J. P. , & Watson, S. S. (1994). An assessment of public administration journals: The perspective of editors and editorial board members. Public Administration Review, 54, 474-482.
19.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. London: Polity.
20.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.
21.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Doubleday.
22.
Golden, M. M. (1992). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: Bureaucratic responses to presidential responses during the Reagan administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 29-62.
23.
Golden-Biddle, K. , & Locke, K. (1993). Appealing work: An investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4, 595-616.
24.
Hammersley, M. (1989). The dilemma of qualitative method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago tradition. London: Routledge.
25.
Houston, D. J. , & Delevan, S. M. (1990). Public administration research: An assessment of journal publications. Public Administration Review, 50, 674-681.
26.
Houston, D. J. , & Delevan, S. M. (1994). A comparative assessment of public administration journal publications. Administration & Society, 26, 252-271.
27.
Hummel, R. P. (1991). Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science. Public Administration Review, 51, 31-41.
28.
Kelly, M. (1994). Theories of justice and street-level discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 119-140.
29.
Kelly, M. , & Maynard-Moody, S. (1993). Policy analysis in the post-positivist era: Engaging stakeholders in evaluating the economic development district’s program. Public Administration Review, 53, 135-142.
30.
King, G. , Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
31.
Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1962). The impact of the behavioral approach on traditional political science. In A. Ranney (Ed.), Essays on the behavioral study of politics (pp. 1-29). Urbana: University of Illinois.
32.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Litwin, H. (1993). Neighborhood self-management in Jerusalem: Planning issues and implementation dilemmas. Administration & Society, 25, 335-352.
34.
Lofland, J. , & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
35.
McCurdy, H. E. , & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration?Public Administration Review, 44, 49-55.
36.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Miller, H. T. (1993). Everyday politics in public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 23, 99-116.
38.
O’Leary, R. (1994). The bureaucratic politics paradox: The case of wetlands legislation in Nevada. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 4, 443-467.
39.
Orosz, J. F. (1997). Resources for qualitative research: Advancing the application of alternative methodologies in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 543-549.
40.
Orosz, J. F. (1998). Widening the yellow brick road: Answering the call for improved and relevant research in public administration. Research in Public Administration, 4, 87-105.
41.
Perry, J. L. , & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research methodology in the public administration review, 1975-1984. Public Administration Review, 46, 215-226.
42.
Roberts, N. C. , & King, P. J. (1991). Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 147-175.
43.
Rubin, H. J. (1993). Understanding the ethos of community-based development: Ethnographic description for public administrators. Public Administration Review, 53, 428-437.
44.
Rubin, H. J. (1995). Renewing hope in the inner city: Conversations with community-based development practitioners. Administration & Society, 27, 127-160.
45.
Rubin, H. J. , & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Schmidt, M. R. (1993). Grout: Alternative kinds of knowledge and why they are ignored. Public Administration Review, 53, 525-530.
47.
Schutt, R. K. (1999). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
48.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Shareef, R. (1994). Subsystem congruence: A strategic change model for public organizations. Administration & Society, 25, 489-517.
50.
Smith, J. K. (1983, March). Quantitative versus qualitative research: An attempt to clarify the issue. Educational Researcher, 12, 6-13.
51.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
52.
Stallings, R. A. , & Ferris, J. A. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR 1940-1984. Public Administration Review, 48, 580-587.
53.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
54.
Strauss, A. L. , & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
Sutton, R. I. (1997). The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organization Science, 8, 97-106.
56.
Taylor, C. (1971). Interpretation and the sciences of man. Review of Metaphysics, 25, 3-51.
57.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
58.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field. Chicago: University of Chicago.
59.
Van Maanen, J. (Ed.). (1995). Rep resentation in ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60.
Vidich, A. J. , & Lyman, S. M. (1994). Qualitative methods: Their history in sociology and anthropology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 23-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences (E. A. Shils & H. N. Finch, Eds. and Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
62.
White, J. D. (1986). Dissertations and publications in public administration. Public Administration Review, 46, 227-234.
63.
Wolcott, H. F. (1992). Posturing in qualitative inquiry. In M. D. Lecompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 3-52). New York: Academic.
64.
Yanow, D. (1992). Silences in public policy discourse: Organizational and policy myths. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 399-423.
