This article examines pragmatism’s role in aspects of American public administration’s development during the period of the orthodoxy and the reactions to the orthodoxy (roughly 1920 to 1950). It concludes that the administrative mainstream of expertise never embraced, and indeed implicitly rejected, the pragmatism of Peirce, James, and Dewey, which is characterized by an attitude of experimentation. A more complete understanding of this aspect of our intellectual heritage is important as we consider contemporary calls for a turn toward pragmatism as a way to address the legitimacy issue, the theory-practice gap, and other problematic conditions in the field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boisvert, R. D. (1998). John Dewey: Rethinking our time. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey. Chicago: Open Court.
3.
Caiden, G. D. (1971). The dynamics of public administration. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
4.
Commager, H. S. (1964). The American mind: An interpretation of American thought and character since the 1880s. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Conkin, P. K. (1968). Puritans and pragmatists: Eight eminent American thinkers. New York: Dodd, Mead.
6.
DeLeon, P. , & Overman, E. S. (1989). A history of the policy sciences. In J. Rabin, W. B. Hildreth, & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 405-442). New York: Marcel Dekker.
7.
Depew, D. (1995). Introduction to Part II: Pragmatism, positivism, and the linguistic turn. In R. Hollinger & D. Depew (Eds.), Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism (pp. 109-121). Westport, CT: Praeger.
8.
de Toqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America (G. Lawrence, Ed., & J. P. Mayer, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row. (Original work published 1835)
9.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
10.
Dewey, J. (1998a). The development of American pragmatism. In L. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey (pp. 3-13). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11.
Dewey, J. (1998b). The inclusive philosophic idea. In L. Hickman & T. M. Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey (pp. 308-315). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12.
Drucker, P. (1995). Introduction. In P. Graham (Ed.), Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of management (pp. 1-9). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
Egger, R. (1975). The period of crisis: 1933 to 1945. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 49-96). University: University of Alabama Press.
14.
Fesler, J. W. (1975). Public administration and the social sciences: 1946 to 1960. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 97-141). University: University of Alabama Press.
15.
Follett, M. P. (1918). The new state. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.
16.
Follett, M. (1919, November). Community is a process. The Philosophical Review, 28, 576-588.
17.
Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York: Longmans, Green.
18.
Fry, B. R. (1989). Mastering public administration. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
19.
Gaus, J. M. (1936). American society and public administration. In J. M. Gaus, L. D. White, & M. E. Dimock (Eds.), The frontiers of public administration. Chicago: University of Chicago.
20.
Gaus, J. M. (1947). Reflections on public administration. University: University of Alabama Press.
21.
Henry, N. (1975, July/August). Paradigms of public administration. Public Administration Review, 35, 378-386.
22.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longmans, Green.
23.
Karl, B. D. (1970). Foreword. In C. E. Merriam, New aspects of politics (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Kelly, A. H. , Harbison, W. A., & Belz, H. (1983). The American Constitution: Its origins and development (6th ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
25.
Lovejoy, A. O. (1963). The thirteen pragmatisms and other essays. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
McSwite, O. (1996). Round #3: On the necessity of admitting the idea of the unconscious into any post-rational model of public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 18(1), 51-52.
27.
McSwite, O. (1999). On the proper relation of the theory community to the mainstream public administration community. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(1), 4-9.
28.
Miller, H. , & King, C. (1998, March). Practical theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 28, 43-60.
29.
Moore, E. C. (1961). American pragmatism: Peirce, James, and Dewey. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
Morstein Marx, F. (Ed.). (1946). Elements of public administration. Englewoood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Mosher, F. C. (Ed.). (1975). American public administration: Past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press.
32.
Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral man and immoral society. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
33.
Rucker, D. (1969). The Chicago pragmatists. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the high tide of American liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
35.
Sabine, G. (1930, November). The pragmatic approach to politics. The American Political Science Review, 24, 865-885.
36.
Safford, J. L. (1987). Pragmatism and the progressive movement in the United States. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
37.
Sayre, W. B. (1978). Premises of public administration: Past and emerging. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde, (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 198-201). Oak Park, IL: Moore Publishing.
38.
Scheffler, I. (1986). Four pragmatists: A critical introduction to Peirce, James, Mead, and Dewey. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
39.
Schneider, H. W. (1948). A history of American philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
40.
Shafritz, J. M. , & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.). (1978). Classics of public administration. Oak Park, IL: Moore.
41.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
42.
Snider, K. (1998). Living pragmatism: The case of Mary Parker Follett. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 20(3), 274-286.
43.
Stein, H. (1952). Public administration and policy development: A case book. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
44.
Stever, J. (1986, August). Mary Parker Follett and the quest for pragmatic administration. Administration and Society, 18, 159-177.
45.
Stever, J. (1998). Pragmatism. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (pp. 1734-1736). Boulder, CO: Westview.
46.
Stone, A. B. , & Stone, D. C. (1975a). Early development of education in public administration. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 11-48). University: University of Alabama Press.
47.
Stone, A. B. & Stone, D. C. (1975b). Appendix: Case histories of early professional educational programs. In F. C. Mosher (Ed.), American public administration: Past, present, future (pp. 268-269). University: University of Alabama Press.
48.
Stumpf, S. E. (1966). Socrates to Sartre: A history of philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
Terry, L. (1998). Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement. Public Administration Review, 58(3), 194-200.
50.
Thayer, H. S. (1982). Pragmatism: The classic writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.
51.
Waldo, D. (1952, March). Development of the theory of democratic administration. American Political Science Review, 46, 81-103.
52.
Waldo, D. (1984). The administrative state (2nd ed.). New York: Holmes and Meier.
53.
Wamsley, G. L. (1990). The agency perspective. In G. L. Wamsleyet al. (Eds.), Refounding public administration (pp. 114-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
White, L. D. (1955). Introduction to the study of administration (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
55.
White, M. (1973). Pragmatism and the American mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
White, O. , & McSwain, C. (1990). The Phoenix project: Raising a new image of public administration from the ashes of the past. Administration & Society, 22, 3-38.
57.
Willoughby, W. F. (1927). Principles of public administration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
58.
Wilson, D. J. (1995). Fertile ground: Pragmatism, positivism, and the linguistic turn. In R. Hollinger & D. Depew (Eds.), Pragmatism: From progressivism to postmodernism (pp. 122-141). Westport, CT: Praeger.
