Abstract
Michael Howard, Regius professor of modem history at Oxford University, has become an outspoken commentator on contemporary strategic policy. An analysis of his writings reveals he advocates a strategic approach to international relations that-emphasizes the complexities facing nation-states which endeavor to maintain stability while guarding their value systems; adopts a historical approach to the causes of war that stresses the importance of "bellicism" as a causal factor; examines the dimensions of strategy that deplore the neglect of social factors; and seeks to avoid conflict through reliance on both the nuclear and conventional aspects of deterrence. His trenchant criticisms have brought the wrath of modern hawks and doves, while he has sought an "owl" position between the two camps.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.