The Taliban insurgency in northwest Pakistan has gained relatively limited research attention, and their micro-level violence techniques are underexplored. This article examines the insurgency and applies Randall Collins’s interaction theory of violence to analyze the Taliban’s violent tactics. Based on qualitative data, the findings indicate that the Taliban’s methods of executing violence included strategic decisions and actions; their methods and actions were calculating, discriminate, and deliberate. Such actions by the Taliban included targeting the vulnerable, engaging in violence by deception, conducting remote acts of violence, staging violent incidents, and employing threats to coerce, instill fear, and establish dominance. The examination and findings surrounding violent tactics in warfare highlight the impacts of interactional micro and emotional methods in intrastate conflicts, contribute to the literature on insurgent violence, and enhance sociological understanding of political violence.
AkhtarS.AhmedZ. S. (2023). Understanding the resurgence of the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 16(3), 285–306.
2.
ArjonaA. (2010). Social order in civil war [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Yale University].
3.
ArjonaA.KalyvasS. N. (2011). Recruitment into armed groups in Colombia: A survey of demobilized fighters. In GuichaouaY. (Ed.), Understanding collective political violence: Conflict, inequality and ethnicity (pp. 143–171). Palgrave-Macmillan.
4.
BakkourS.StansfieldG. (2024). Sectarianism, indiscriminate violence and displacement in the Syrian Regime’s Civil War strategy. Conflict, Security & Development, 24(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2024.2349057
5.
BarnesN. (2023). The enduring influence of The Logic of Violence in Civil War, by Stathis N. Kalyvas, Cambridge University Press, 2006, 488 pp. Civil Wars, 25(2–3), 569–576.
6.
BermanE.CallenM.FelterJ. H.ShapiroJ. N. (2011). Do working men rebel? Insurgency and unemployment in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Philippines. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(4), 496–528.
7.
BoukharsA. (2020). The logic of violence in Africa’s extremist insurgencies. Perspectives on Terrorism, 14(5), 117–129.
8.
BrandschJ. (2020). Killing civilians in civil war: The rationale of indiscriminate violence. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
10.
CedermanL. E.GirardinL. (2007). Beyond fractionalization: Mapping ethnicity onto nationalist insurgencies. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 173–185.
11.
CentenoM. A.EnriquezE. (2016). War and society (1st ed.). Polity Press.
12.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(4), 563–595.
13.
CollinsR. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton University Press.
14.
CollinsR. (2008). Violence: A micro-sociological theory. Princeton University Press.
15.
CollinsR. (2009a). Micro and macro theories of violence. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 9–22.
16.
CollinsR. (2009b). The micro-sociology of violence. The British Journal of Sociology, 60(2), 566–576.
CollinsR. (2022). Explosive conflict: Time-dynamics of violence. Princeton University Press.
19.
Della PortaD. (2006). Social movements, political violence and the state: A comparative analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge University Press.
20.
EckK. (2010). Raising rebels: Participation and recruitment in civil war [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Uppsala University].
21.
EisnerM. (2009). The uses of violence: An examination of some cross-cutting issues. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 3(1), 40–59.
22.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.
23.
GreenA. H. (2018). The commander’s dilemma: Violence and restraint in wartime. Cornell University Press.
24.
HegreH.EllingsenT.GatesS.GleditschN. P. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 33–48.
25.
HegreH.ØstbyG.RaleighC. (2009). Poverty and civil war events: A disaggregated study of Liberia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(4), 598–623.
26.
HumphreysM.WeinsteinJ. (2008). Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 436–455.
27.
KalyvasS. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
28.
KalyvasS. N. (2012). Micro-level studies of violence in civil war: Refining and extending the control-collaboration model. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(4), 658–668.
29.
KalyvasS. N.KocherM. A. (2007). How “free” is free-riding in civil wars? Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem. World Politics, 59(2), 177–216.
30.
KocherM. A.PepinskyT.KalyvasS. N. (2011). Aerial bombing and counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 1–18.
31.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
32.
Liddel-HartB. H. (1967). Strategy (2nd rev. ed.). Meridian.
33.
LindholmC. (2013). Swat in retrospect: Continuities, transformations and possibilities. In HopkinsB. D.MarsdenM. (Eds.), Beyond Swat: History, society and economy along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border (pp. 17–27). Hurst and Company.
34.
LyallJ. (2009). Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 331–362.
35.
LyallJ. (2010). Are co-ethnics more effective counter-insurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 1–20.
36.
MaleševićS. (2013). Nation-states and nationalisms: Organisation, ideology and solidarity. Polity Press.
37.
MaleševićS. (2015). Where does group solidarity come from? Gellner and Ibn Khaldun Revisited. Thesis Eleven, 128(1), 85–99.
MaleševićS. (2017b). The rise of organised brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge University Press.
40.
MaleševićS. (2022a). Review of Randall Collins, Explosive conflict: Time-dynamics of violence [Review of the book Explosive conflict: Time-dynamics of violence, by R. Collins]. Society, 59(6), 795–798.
41.
MaleševićS. (2022b). Why humans fight: The social dynamics of close-range violence (New ed.). Cambridge University Press.
42.
MaoT. (2000). On guerrilla warfare (GriffithS. B., Trans.). University of Illinois Press. (Original work published 1937)
43.
MaynardJ. L. (2022). Ideology and mass killing: The radicalized security politics of genocides and deadly atrocities. Oxford University Press.
44.
Müller-FunkL. (2023). Violence, life aspirations and displacement trajectories in civil war. International Migration, 61(6), 209–227.
45.
NordstromC. (1997). A different kind of war story. University of Pennsylvania Press.
46.
O’LoughlinJ.WitmerF. D. W. (2011). The localized geographies of violence in the North Caucasus of Russia, 1999–2007. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 101(1), 178–201.
47.
OrakzaiS. B. (2011). Conflict in the Swat Valley of Pakistan: Pakhtun culture and peacebuilding theory-practice application. Journal of Peace Building & Development, 6(1), 35–48.
48.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
RitholtzS. (2022). The ontology of cruelty in civil war: The analytical utility of characterizing violence in conflict studies. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(2), ksac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/isagsq/ksac014
51.
Sanaullah. (2020). Effectiveness of civilians’ survival strategies: Insights from the Taliban’s insurgency (2007–09) in Swat Valley, Pakistan. Global Change, Peace and Security, 32(3), 275–296.
52.
Sanaullah. (2021a). Context-specificity of violence: Physical, psychological and social dimensions of harm during the Taliban’s insurgency (2007–2009) in Pakistan. Violence: An International Journal, 2(1), 43–64.
53.
Sanaullah. (2021b). Civilians’ survival strategies during the Taliban’s insurgency (2007–9), Pakistan: A look at the consequences. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 32(1), 26–52.
54.
Sanaullah. (2021c). Understanding social disruption in armed conflict: Its significance for post-conflict reconstruction in Swat Valley, Pakistan. Conflict, Security & Development, 21(5), 615–639.
55.
Sanaullah. (2025a). Civilians’ strategies of post-traumatic growth (PTG): The significance of Pashtunwali culture in the Swat conflict in Pakistan. Transcultural Psychiatry. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615251355387
56.
Sanaullah. (2025b). Eurocentric ethics and Pakhtunwali in Northwest Pakistan: Decolonising qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2024-0175
57.
Scheper-HughesN. (1992). Death without weeping: The violence of everyday life in Brazil. University of California Press.
StanilandP. (2010). Explaining cohesion, fragmentation, and control in insurgent groups [Doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
60.
StantonJ. A. (2016). Violence and restraint in civil war: Civilian targeting in the shadow of international law. Cambridge University Press.
61.
SteeleA. (2009). Seeking safety: Avoiding displacement and choosing destinations in civil wars. Journal of Peace Research, 46(3), 419–429.
62.
Sultan-i-Rome. (2011). Crisis and reconciliation in Swat. Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 3(1), 53–79.
63.
ViternaJ. S. (2006). Pulled, pushed, and persuaded: Explaining women’s mobilization into the Salvadoran guerrilla army. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 1–45.
64.
WeinsteinJ. (2007). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge University Press.
65.
WieviorkaM. (2014). The sociological analysis of violence: New perspectives. The Sociological Review, 62(S2), 50–64.
66.
WoodR. M. (2010). Rebel capability and strategic violence against civilians. Journal of Peace Research, 47(5), 601–614.
