Military extremism is a critical threat to democratic norms. While past research has found that cynicism is positively associated with political extremism in the general population, it has not fully addressed the association between cynicism and military extremism—nor what factors are associated with cynicism to begin with. We identify social media use, organizational instability, and psychological distance from leadership as potential predictors of cynicism. We then test their association with both cynicism and political extremism using a novel survey of United States service academy students. We find that organizational instability and the use of anonymous social media to “share concerns” are positively associated with cynicism, while other uses of social media, psychological distance, and alternative explanations involving military socialization are not. Finally, both cynicism and organizational instability are associated with greater political extremism. This study thus highlights structural factors that may affect personal levels of cynicism and extremism.
AbrahamR. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269–292.
2.
AlejosM. C.ShimK.HallN. E.Jr. (2023). Measuring a conductive environment for toxic leadership at USNA. Naval Postgraduate School.
3.
AntonakisJ.AtwaterL. (2017). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. In HooperA. (Ed.), Leadership perspectives (pp. 129–160). Routledge.
4.
BachmanJ. G.Freedman-DoanP.SegalD. R.O'MalleyP. M. (2000). Distinctive military attitudes among US enlistees, 1976-1997: Self-selection versus socialization. Armed Forces & Society, 26(4), 561–585.
5.
BangH.ReioT. G.Jr. (2017). Examining the role of cynicism in the relationships between burnout and employee behavior. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(3), 217–227.
6.
BarberM.PopeJ. C. (2019). Conservatism in the era of Trump. Perspectives on Politics, 17(3), 719–736.
7.
BöhmeltT.Escribà-FolchA.PilsterU. (2019). Pitfalls of professionalism? Military academies and coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(5), 1111–1139.
8.
BorumR. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7–36.
9.
BrooksR. A.GrewalS. (2022). “Twice the citizen”: How military attitudes of superiority undermine civilian control in the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66(4–5), 623–650.
10.
BrooksR. A.RobinsonM. A.UrbenH. A. (2023). Following orders or following the oath? Assessing democratic norm endorsement among service academy cadets. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 68(7–8), 1279–1306. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027231195385
11.
De AngelisK. K.KeltyR.EnderM. G.RohallD. E.MatthewsM. D. (2020). Ubiquity with a dark side: Civil-military gaps in social media usage. In de BaseggioE. M.SchneiderO.TreschT. S. (Eds.), Social media and the armed forces (pp. 15–30). Springer.
12.
DeFleurL. B.WarnerR. L. (1987). Air Force Academy graduates and nongraduates: Attitudes and self-concepts. Armed Forces & Society, 13(4), 517–533.
13.
De VreeseC. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication & Society, 7(2), 191–214.
14.
DrakeM. J. (2006). Ambivalence at the academies: Attitudes toward women in the military at the federal service academies. Social Thought & Research, 27, 43–68.
15.
ElsonS. B.KeltyR.PaulsonK.BornmannJ.De AngelisK. K. (2020). Social media use at a U.S. Military Academy: Perceived implications for performance and behavior. In de BaseggioE. M.SchneiderO.TreschT. S. (Eds.), Social media and the armed forces (pp. 31–50). Springer.
16.
EnderM. G.RohallD. E.BrennanA. J.MatthewsM. D.SmithI.III (2012). Civilian, ROTC, and military academy undergraduate attitudes toward homosexuals in the US military: A research note. Armed Forces & Society, 38(1), 164–172.
17.
FrankeV. C. (2001). Generation X and the military: A comparison of attitudes and values between West Point cadets and college students. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 29, 92–119.
18.
HasellA.HalversenA.WeeksB. E. (2025). When social media attack: How exposure to political attacks on social media promotes anger and political cynicism. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 30(1), 167–186.
19.
HaugstvedtH.KoehlerD. (2023). Armed and explosive? An explorative statistical analysis of extremist radicalization cases with military background. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35(3), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1957675
20.
Hiaeshutter-RiceD.HawkinsI. (2022). The language of extremism on social media: An examination of posts, comments, and themes on Reddit. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 805008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.805008
21.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 2). McGraw-Hill.
22.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state. Belknap Press.
23.
JahnkeS.Abad BorgerK.BeelmannA. (2022). Predictors of political violence outcomes among young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Political Psychology, 43(1), 111–129.
24.
Jones-JangS. M.KimD. H.KenskiK. (2021). Perceptions of mis-or disinformation exposure predict political cynicism: Evidence from a two-wave survey during the 2018 US midterm elections. New Media & Society, 23(10), 3105–3125.
25.
KarkR.Karazi-PreslerT.TubiS. (2016). Paradox and challenges in military leadership. In PeusC.BraunS.SchynsB. (Eds.), Leadership lessons from compelling contexts (Vol. 8, pp. 157–187). Emerald Group.
26.
KoehlerD. (2022). From superiority to supremacy: Exploring the vulnerability of military and police special forces to extreme right radicalization. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 48(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2090047
27.
KruglanskiA. W.JaskoK.ChernikovaM.DugasM.WebberD. (2018). To the fringe and back: Violent extremism and the psychology of deviance. In KruglanskiA. (Ed.), The motivated mind (pp. 344–366). Routledge.
28.
KurpiusS. E. R.LucartA. L. (2000). Military and civilian undergraduates: Attitudes toward women, masculinity, and authoritarianism. Sex Roles, 43, 255–265.
29.
LaFreeG.JensenM. A.JamesP. A.Safer-LichtensteinA. (2018). Correlates of violent political extremism in the United States. Criminology, 56(2), 233–268.
30.
LeungK.LiF.ZhouF. (2012). Sex differences in social cynicism across societies: The role of men’s higher competitiveness and male dominance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7), 1152–1166.
31.
MoskalenkoS. (2021). Zip-tie guys: Military-grade radicalization among Capitol Hill insurrectionists. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 14(2), 179–191.
32.
NguyenD. T.TeoS. T.PickD.JemaiM. (2018). Cynicism about change, work engagement, and job satisfaction of public sector nurses. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(2), 172–186.
33.
Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness. (2024). Population representation in the military services: Fiscal year 2022 summary report.
34.
OzerS.BertelsenP. (2018). Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12484
35.
PattynS.Van HielA.DhontK.OnraetE. (2012). Stripping the political cynic: A psychological exploration of the concept of political cynicism. European Journal of Personality, 26(6), 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.858
36.
PflanzS.SonnekS. (2002). Work stress in the military: Prevalence, causes, and relationship to emotional health. Military Medicine, 167(11), 877–882. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/167.11.877
37.
PitreL. J. (2004). Organizational cynicism at the United States Naval Academy: An exploratory study [Doctoral dissertation, Naval Postgraduate School].
38.
RohallD. E.EnderM. G.MatthewsM. D. (2006). The effects of military affiliation, gender, and political ideology on attitudes toward the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Armed Forces & Society, 33(1), 59–77.
39.
RooduijnM.Van der BrugW.De LangeS. L.ParlevlietJ. (2017). Persuasive populism? Estimating the effect of populist messages on political cynicism. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 136–145.
40.
RottweilerB.GillP.BouhanaN. (2022). Individual and environmental explanations for violent extremist intentions: A German nationally representative survey study. Justice Quarterly, 39(4), 825–846.
SchmuckD.FawziN.ReinemannC.RiesmeyerC. (2022). Social media use and political cynicism among German youth: The role of information orientation, exposure to extremist content, and online media literacy. Journal of Children and Media, 16(3), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1977358
43.
SchuckA. R.BoomgaardenH. G.de VreeseC. H. (2013). Cynics all around? The impact of election news on political cynicism in comparative perspective. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 287–311.
ShamirB.ZakayE.BraininE.PopperM. (2000). Leadership and social identification in military units: Direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(3), 612–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02499.x
46.
ShaoL.LiuD. (2019). The road to cynicism: The political consequences of online satire exposure in China. Political Studies, 67(2), 517–536.
47.
ShapiraI. (2021, July12). Derision, misogyny, sexual assault: VMI women face attacks on campus and online. The Washington Post.
48.
SimiP.BubolzB. F.HardmanA. (2013). Military experience, identity discrepancies, and far right terrorism: An exploratory analysis. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(8), 654–671.
49.
SoetersJ.RechtR. (1998). Culture and discipline in military academies: An international comparison. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 26(2), 169–189.
50.
SondheimerR. M.TonerK.WilsonIIII (2013). Cadet perceptions of military and civilian ideology: A research note. Armed Forces & Society, 39(1), 124–134.
51.
SongH.de ZúñigaH. G.BoomgaardenH. G. (2021). Social media news use and political cynicism: Differential pathways through “news finds me” perception. In ShenF. (Ed.), Social media news and its impact (pp. 74–97). Routledge.
52.
SouthwellP. L. (2008). The effect of political alienation on voter turnout, 1964-2000. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 36(1), 131–145.
53.
SpeckhardA.EllenbergM.GarretT. M. (2021). The challenge of extremism in the military is not going away without a new perspective. International Center for the Study of Violent Extremism.
54.
SpiroA.IIISetterstenR. A.AldwinC. M. (2016). Long-term outcomes of military service in aging and the life course: A positive re-envisioning. The Gerontologist, 56(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv093
Van HielA.Van AsscheJ.HaesevoetsT.Gordon HodsonD. d. C. (2021). A radical vision of radicalization: Political cynicism, not incrementally stronger than partisan positions, explains political radicalization. Political Psychology, 43(S1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12785
57.
VirtanenT. E.RäikkönenE.EngelsM. C.VasalampiK.LerkkanenM. K. (2021). Student engagement, truancy, and cynicism: A longitudinal study from primary school to upper secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101972.
58.
WebberD.KruglanskiA. W. (2018). The social psychological makings of a terrorist. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 131–134.
59.
WeiX.WangR.MacdonaldE. (2015). Exploring the relations between student cynicism and student burnout. Psychological Reports, 117(1), 103–115.
60.
WeissJ. K.AnzurC. K. (2024). “Sometimes, during deployment, it seems like we won’t make it”: US military deployment transition issues as a precursor to couples’ reintegration issues. Journal of Family Issues, 45(4), 931–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X231162968
61.
YamamotoM.KushinM. J.DalisayF. (2017). Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media use on apathy. Mass Communication and Society, 20(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1224352
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
