As technological superiority becomes increasingly vital for military effectiveness, a distinct category of technological leaders has emerged within militaries. This qualitative study explores excellence in this domain by interviewing 11 recipients of the prestigious Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Technological Award. In-depth interviews grounded in the critical incident technique revealed four integral facets of military tech leadership excellence: Technical mastery built through expertise and continuous learning, mission dedication demonstrated through overcoming obstacles, interpersonal skills in understanding needs and translating across domains, and adaptability in integrating innovation. Notable findings show that technologists adhere to canonical military leadership values such as mission dedication, although they apply them distinctly for technological purposes. Compared with traditional military leadership, tech leaders have specialized skills in bridging operational necessities and technological solutions. This study proposes a framework that encapsulates the attributes, motivations, and behaviors that underpin excellence in military technological leadership. These findings have implications for selection, training, and development of future leaders in military technology.
AdamskyD. (Dima). (2010). The culture of military innovation: The impact of cultural factors on the revolution in military affairs in Russia, the US, and Israel. Stanford University Press.
2.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M.JungD. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.
3.
BalwantP. (2019). Stay close! The role of leader distance in the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, and performance in undergraduate project teams. Journal of Education for Business, 94(6), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1541851
4.
Ben-AriE.Ben-ShalomU.SternN.MoelkerR. (2024). Introduction: Seven Theses on Heroism in Post-heroic Societies. In Ben-ShalomU.MoelkerR.SternN.Ben-AriE. (Eds.), Military heroism in a post-heroic era (pp. 3–19). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51556-9_1
5.
BennisW.NanusB. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. Harper & Row.
ButterfieldL. D.BorgenW. A.AmundsonN. E.MaglioA. S. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497.
8.
BycioP.HackettR. D.AllenJ. S. (1995). Further assessments of Bass’s (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468–478. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.468
9.
CarcaryM. (2020). The research audit trail: Methodological guidance for application in practice. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 18(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.008
10.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. L.StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.
11.
DirksK. T.FerrinD. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
12.
DragoniL.OhI.-S.TeslukP. E.MooreO. A.VanKatwykP.HazuchaJ. (2014). Developing leaders’ strategic thinking through global work experience: The moderating role of cultural distance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036628
13.
DuckworthA. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance (First Scribner hardcover ed.). Scribner.
14.
EvaN.RobinM.SendjayaS.van DierendonckD.LidenR. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
15.
FiottD. (2017). A revolution too far? U.S. defence innovation, Europe and NATO’s military-technological gap. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(3), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2016.1176565
16.
FlanganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
17.
GilliA. (2021). NATO, technological superiority, and emerging and disruptive technologies. In TardyT. (Ed.), NATO 2030: New technologies, new conflicts, new partnerships (pp. 5–18). NATO Defense College.
18.
GilliA.GilliM. (2019a). Imitation, innovation, disruption: Challenges to NATO’s superiority in military technology [NDC Policy Brief No. 25-19]. NATO Defense College.
19.
GilliA.GilliM. (2019b). Why China has not caught up yet: Military-technological superiority and the limits of imitation, reverse engineering, and cyber espionage. International Security, 43(3), 141–189. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00337
20.
GladwellM. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. Penguin Books.
21.
GlaserB. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100203
22.
HaalandT. L. (2024). Professionalized heroism? Comparing US, UK, and Norwegian war decorations from the war in Afghanistan. Armed Forces & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X231225449
23.
HardyL.ArthurC. A.JonesG.ShariffA.MunnochK.IsaacsI.AllsoppA. J. (2010). The relationship between transformational leadership behaviors, psychological, and training outcomes in elite military recruits. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.002
24.
HunterE. M.NeubertM. J.PerryS. J.WittL. A.PenneyL. M.WeinbergerE. (2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.12.001
25.
JohnsonW. B.AndersonG. R. (2010). Formal mentoring in the U.S. military—Research evidence, lingering questions, and recommendations. Naval War College Review, 63(2), 113–126.
26.
KaneG. C.AndrusG. R.CopulskyJ. R.Nguyen PhillipsA. (2019). The technology fallacy: How people are the real key to digital transformation. MIT Press.
27.
KeatingB. (2021). Into the impossible: Think like a nobel prize winner: Lessons from Laureates to stoke curiosity, spur collaboration, and ignite imagination. Lioncrest Publishing.
28.
KingA. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32(4), 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X05283041
29.
KingA.BuryP. (2023). How (not) to win a medal: Military professionalism, gallantry awards, and the problem of fraud. Armed Forces & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X231160104
30.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
LabinJ. (2017). Mentoring programs that work. ATD Press.
33.
LeiderR. J. (2015). The power of purpose: Creating meaning in your life and work. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
34.
LevittH. M.MotulskyS. L.WertzF. J.MorrowS. L.PonterottoJ. G. (2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082
35.
LuningC. R.AttohP. A.GongT.FoxJ. T. (2022). A culture of organizational grit from the perspective of U.S. military officers: A qualitative inquiry. Armed Forces & Society, 48(3), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20985197
PopperM.LandauO.GluskinosU. M. (1992). The Israeli defence forces: An example of transformational leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 13(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001169
46.
PowelB. (2018). Iraq, Afghanistan, and rethinking the post-heroic turn: Military decorations as indicators of change in warfare. Journal of Historical Sociology, 31(1), e16–e31. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12175
47.
RodgersB. L.CowlesK. V. (1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160309
48.
SchnellT.HögeT.PolletE. (2013). Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830763
49.
ŠimanauskienėV.GiedraitytėV.NavickienėO. (2021). The role of military leadership in shaping innovative personnel behaviour: The case of the Lithuanian armed forces. Sustainability, 13(16), 9283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169283
SolomonT.SafraiM. (2015). The best are leaving? The question of quality and retention in the IDF. Mamda. (In Hebrew)
52.
SternN.Ben-ShalomU.GoldN.BergerC.AntonovskyA.PelegD. (2022). Tunnel operations in the israel defense forces: Adapting the warrior ethos to post-heroic conflict. Armed Forces & Society, 48(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X20924040
53.
TaylorR. L. (2018). Military leadership: In pursuit of excellence. Routledge.
54.
TongA.SainsburyP.CraigJ. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
55.
UlmerW. F. (2010). Military leadership into the 21st century: Another “bridge too far?”The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 40(4), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2562
56.
UlrichD.KryscynskiD.BrockbankW.UlrichM. (2017). Victory through organization: Why the war for talent is failing your company and what you can do about it. McGraw-Hill.
57.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass.
58.
ZennoucheM.ZhangJ. (2014). Evolution of leadership and organizational culture research on innovation field: 12 years of analysis. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(4), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.24044
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
