The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), like most gender-integrated militaries, has a serious issue with sexual misconduct. However, despite the ubiquity of this form of violence, civil–military relations (CMR), arguably the dominant theory for addressing the politics of the civilian control of the armed forces, has paid little attention to gendered power relations. In this article, we utilize Canada as a case study to question the utility of CMR to address sexual misconduct. We find that major changes to the approach are necessary if CMR is to remain relevant to the study of emerging and increasingly complex challenges faced by militaries, like sexual misconduct. To this end, we suggest three strategies to develop the theoretical and analytical foundations of the CMR approach.
BidenJ. (2021, July2). Statement of President Joe Biden on the results of the independent review commission on military sexual assault. The White House.
7.
BlandD. L. (1999). A unified theory of civil-military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 26(1), 7–25.
8.
BlandD. L. (2000). Who decides what? Civil-military relations in Canada and the United States. Canadian-American Public Policy, vol. 41, 1–60.
CarreirasH. (2004). Gender and the Military: A comparative study of the participation of women in the armed forces of western democracies [Doctoral Dissertation, European University Institute, Italy].
25.
CarreirasH. (2015). Gender and civil-military relations in advanced democracies. Res Militaris, ERGOMAS, 1(1), 1–18.
CohnC.EnloeC. (2003). A conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists look at masculinity and the men who wage war. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1187–1107.
CraigE. (2020). An examination of how the Canadian Military’s legal system responds to sexual assault. Dalhousie Law Journal, 43(1), 1–39.
32.
DandekerC. (2003). Women soldiers: Problems and perspectives in the integration of women into the British Army. Revue francaise de sociologie, 44(4), 735–758.
33.
DavisK. D. (1997). Understanding women’s exit from the Canadian forces: Implications or integration? In WeinsteinL.WhiteC. C. (Eds.), Wives and warriors: Women and the military in the United States and Canada (pp. 199–235). Greenwood.
34.
DavisK. D.McKeeB. (2004). Women in the military: Facing the warrior framework. In PinchF.C.MacIntyreA. T.BrowneP.OkrosA. C. (Eds.), Challenge and change in the military: Gender and diversity issues (pp. 199–235). Canadian Defence Academy Press.
35.
DeschampsM. (2015, March27). External review into sexual misconduct and sexual harassment in the Canadian Armed Forces. External Review Authority.
36.
EgnellR. (2016). Gender perspectives and military effectiveness: Implementing UNSCR 1325 and the national action plan on women, peace, and security. Prism, 6(1), 72–89.
37.
EichlerM. (2014). Militarized masculinities in international relations. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 81–93.
38.
EichlerM. (2018). Gendered militarism. In C. E. Gentry, L. J. Shepherd, & L. Sjoberg (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and security (pp. 160–171). Routledge.
39.
ElshtainJ. B. (1995). Women and war. University of Chicago Press.
EnloeC. (1989). Bananas, beaches and bases. University of California Press.
42.
EnloeC. (2000). Maneuvers. University of California Press.
43.
EulrietI. (2012). Women and the military in Europe: Comparing public cultures. Springer.
44.
FaludiS. (1992). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. Three Rivers Press.
45.
FeaverP. D. (1996). The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces & Society, 23(2), 149–178.
46.
FeaverP. D. (2003a). The civil–military gap in comparative perspective. Journal of Strategic Studies, 26(2), 1–5.
47.
FeaverP. (2003b). Armed servants: Agency, oversight, and civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
48.
FeaverP. D.KohnR. H. (2021). Civil-Military relations in the United States. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 15(2), 12–37.
49.
FeitzL.NagelJ. (2008). The militarization of gender and sexuality in the Iraq War. In CarreirasH.KümmelG. (Eds.), Women in the Military and in Armed Conflict (pp. 201–225). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
50.
FebbraroA. R. (2003). Women, leadership and gender integration in the Canadian combat arms: A qualitative study (TR 170). Defence R&D Canada—Toronto.
51.
FriedlandM. L. (1996). Controlling misconduct in the military: A study prepared for the commission of inquiry into the deployment of Canadian forces to Somalia. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.
52.
GillR.FebbraroA. R. (2013). Experiences and perceptions of sexual harassment in the Canadian forces combat arms. Violence against Women, 19(2), 269–287.
GosselinD. (2014). The unarmed servants of the state: The evolving role of civilians in National Defence. In GoldenbergI.FebbraroA. F.DeanW. H. (Eds.), The defence team. (pp. 11–47). Canadian Defence Academy Press.
GravelinC. R.BiernatM.BaldwinM. (2019). The impact of power and powerlessness on blaming the victim of sexual assault. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(1), 98–115.
57.
HeineckenL. (2020). South Africa’s post-apartheid military. Springer.
58.
HowellA. (2005). Peaceful, tolerant and orderly? A feminist analysis of discourses of “Canadian values” in Canadian Foreign Policy. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 12(1), 49–69.
59.
HuntingtonS. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil–military relations. Harvard University Press.
60.
JanowitzM. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Simon and Schuster.
61.
JavaidA. (2017). The unknown victims: Hegemonic masculinity, masculinities, and male sexual victimisation. Sociological Research Online, 22(1), 28–47.
JohnstoneR.MomaniB. (2019). Organizational change in Canadian public institutions: The implementations of GBA+ in DND/CAF. Canadian Public Administration, 62(3), 500–519.
64.
JohnstoneR.MomaniB. (2022). Gender mainstreaming in the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence: Lessons on the implementation of gender-based analysis plus (GBA+). Armed Forces & Society, 48(2), 247–273.
65.
KasurakP. (2011). Concepts of professionalism in the Canadian Army, 1946—2000 regimentalism, reaction, and reform. Armed Forces & Society, 37(1), 95–118.
66.
KingA. C. (2015). Women warriors: Female accession to ground combat. Armed Forces & Society, 41(2), 379–387.
67.
KleinU. (2002). The gender perspective of civil-military relations in Israeli society. Current Sociology, 50(5), 669–686.
68.
KoeszegiS.ZedlacherE.HudribsuchR. (2014). The war against the female soldier? The effects of masculine culture on workplace aggression. Armed Forces & Society, 20(2), 226–251.
69.
KronsellA. (2016). Sexed bodies and military masculinities: Gender path dependence in EU’s common security and defense policy. Men and Masculinities, 19(3), 311–336.
70.
LaneA. (2017). Special men: The gendered militarization of the Canadian Armed Forces. International Journal, 72(4), 463–483.
71.
LaneA. (2020). Women in the Canadian Armed Forces. In JuneauT.LagasséP.VuceticS. (Eds.), Canadian defence policy in theory and practice (pp. 351–364). Palgrave Macmillan.
72.
LeuprechtC. (2010). Socially representative armed forces: A democratic imperative. In Szvircsev TreschT.LeuprechtC. (Eds.), Europe without soldiers? Recruitment and retention across the armed forces of Europe (pp. 35–53). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
73.
L’HeaureuxD. (2012). Forward: Still punished for being Female. In SheehyA (Ed.), Sexual assault in Canada: Law, legal practice and women’s activism (pp. 1–6). University of Ottawa Press.
ParpartJ. L. (2015). Militarized masculinities, heroes and gender inequality during and after the nationalist struggle in Zimbabwe. Norma, 10(3–4), 312–325.
RosenS. P. (1995). Military effectiveness: Why society matters. International Security, 19(4), 5–31.
94.
SaidemanS. M. (2020). Canadian civil-military relations in comparative perspective: It could be worse? In JuneauT.LagasséP.VuceticS. (Eds.), Canadian defence policy in theory and practice (pp. 119–134). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sasson-LevyO. (2003). Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli Women Soldiers in “Masculine” Roles. Sociological Inquiry, 73(3), 440–465.
97.
SchiffR. L. (1995). Civil-military relations reconsidered: A theory of concordance. Armed Forces & Society, 22(1), 7–24.
98.
SchroederT.PowellJ. (2018). Right “man” for the job? The influence of gender on civil–military friction. Armed Forces & Society, 44(3), 460–475.
99.
SegalM. (1995). Women’s military roles cross-nationally: Past, present, and future. Gender & Society, 9(6), 757–775.
100.
ShieldsM.MoskosC.WoodF. (Eds.). (1988). The military: More than just a job?Potomac Books.
101.
ShieldsP. (2015). Civil-military relations. In BearfieldD. A.BermanE. M.DubnickM. J. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy (3rd ed., pp. 564–569). Routledge.
102.
SjobergL.ViaS. (2010). Gender, war, and militarism: Feminist perspectives. ABC-CLIO.
SnyderR. C. (1999). Citizen-soldiers and manly warriors: Military service and gender in the civic republican tradition. Rowman & Littlefield.
105.
SnyderR. C. (2003). The citizen-soldier tradition and gender integration of the US military. Armed Forces & Society, 29(2), 185–204.
106.
SowersT. S. (2005). Beyond the soldier and the state: Contemporary operations and variance in principle-agent relationships. Armed Forces & Society, 31(3), 385–409.
StritzelH. (2014). Security in translation: Securitization theory and the localization of threat. Springer.
110.
TaberN. (2017). The Canadian Armed Forces: Battling between operation HONOUR and operation hop on her. Critical Military Studies, 6(1), 19–40.
111.
TaitV. (2015). Gender and the 21st century treat environment. SITREP: Journal of the Royal Canadian Military Institute, 75(1), 5–9.
112.
TaitV. (2020). Regendering the Canadian Armed Forces. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice/atlantis: Études Critiques Sur Le Genre, La Culture, Et La Justice, 41(2), 9–25.
113.
TamaJ. (2016). Independent commissions as settings for civil–military deliberation: The case of women in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 42(2), 407–426.
WhitworthS. (2004). Men, militarism, and UN peacekeeping: A gendered analysis. Lynne Rienner.
116.
WhitworthS. (2005). Militarized masculinities and the politics of peacekeeping: The Canadian Case. In BoothK. (Ed.). Critical security studies and world politics (pp. 89–106). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
117.
WinslowD. (2003). Canadian society and its army. Canadian Military Journal, Winter 2003-2004, 11–24.
118.
WinslowD.DunnJ. (2002). Women in the Canadian forces: Between legal and social integration. Current Sociology, 50(5), 641–667.
