The discourse around the bridging the gap debate is seen to a unique sub-set of the social sciences in the United States as applied to a unique American approach to security. This article looks beyond US National Security and the practices of the discipline of political science at US universities to address, and expand on, some specific ideas in Michael Desch’s volume The Cult of the Irrelevant. We offer that an integrative assessment of how scholarly work can best inform security policies and practices requires more critical examination in four domains: consideration of how different disciplines frame key issues and speak to each other; understanding the dynamics of the policy marketplace; assessments to alternate ways to frame security and national security; and requirements to critical challenge the privilege academics have awarded themselves as the purveyors (and gatekeepers) of ‘knowledge’ and the ‘truth’.
BakerM. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533, 452-454.
4.
BeallJ. (2013). Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learned Publishing, 26, 79-83.
5.
BednarJ.PageS. E. (2016). Complex adaptive systems and comparative politics: Modeling the interaction between institutions and culture. Chinese Political Science Review, 1, 448-471.
6.
BentleyL. W. (2005). Professional ideology and the profession of arms in Canada. Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies.
7.
BlandD. (2000). Everything military officers need to know about defence policy-making in Canada. In RuddD.HansonJ.BlittJ. (Eds.), Canadian strategic forecast 2000: Advance or retreat? Canadian defence in the 21st century (pp. 15-29). Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies.
8.
BourdieuP. (2005). The social structures of the economy. Polity.
9.
BuzanB. (1983). People, states & fear: The national security problem in international relations. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10.
CairneyP. (2012). Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 346-358.
11.
ConwayJ. B. (2013). Review of a chronicle of the work of the CPA 1938-2010. Canadian Psychological Association, 54(2), 133-134.
12.
DeschM. (2019). Cult of the Irrelevant: The Waning Influence of Social Science on National Security. Princeton University Press.
13.
DonoghueF. (2008). The last professors: The corporate university and the fate of the humanities. Fordham University Press.
14.
EyalG.BuchholzL. (2010). From the sociology of intellectuals to the sociology of interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117-137.
15.
FeaverP. D. (1996). The civil-military problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the question of civilian control. Armed Forces & Society, 23(2), 149-178.
16.
Fischbacher-SmithD. (2016). Framing the UK’s counter-terrorism policy within the context of a wicked problem. Public Money & Management, 36(6), 399-408.
17.
FreidsonE. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
18.
Government of Canada (1994). White paper on defence. Department of National Defence.
19.
Government of Canada (2004). Securing an open society: Canada’s national security policy. Privy Council Office.
20.
Government of Canada (2005). Canada’s international policy statement: A role of pride and influence in the world. Foreign Affairs Canada.
21.
Government of Canada (2008). Canada first defence strategy. Department of National Defence.
22.
Government of Canada (2017). Strong, secure, engaged: Canada’s defence policy. Department of National Defence.
23.
GuimarãesM. HPohlC.BinaO.VarandaM. (2019). Who is doing inter- and transdisciplinary research, and why? An empirical study of motivations, attitudes, skills, and behaviours. Futures, 112, 102441.
24.
HarzingA.-W.AdlerN. J. (2016). Disseminating knowledge: From potential to reality-new open-access journals collide with convention. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(1), 140-156.
25.
HashemM. (2002). Academic knowledge from elite closure to professional service: The rise of high-growth fields in American higher education. [PhD Dissertation in sociology. University of California].
26.
HaussC. (2015). Security 2.0: Dealing with global wicked problems. Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
HeadB. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180-197.
28.
HounshellD. (1997). The Cold War, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946-1962. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 27(2), 237-267.
29.
JervisR. (1998). System effects: Complexity in political and social life. Princeton University Press.
30.
JohnsonR.WatkinsonA.MabeM. (2018). The STM report an overview of scientific and scholarly publishing: 50 1968-2018 celebrating the 50th anniversary of STM. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers.
31.
KaplanF. (1983). The wizards of Armageddon. Simon and Schuster.
32.
KapsteinE. B. (2003). Two dismal sciences are better than one-economics and the study of national security: a review essay. International Security, 27(3), 158-187.
33.
LawrenceP. K. (1996). Strategy, hegemony and ideology: The role of intellectuals. Political Studies, 44(1), 4-59.
34.
LindblomC. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79-88.
35.
MacnamaraW. D.Fitz-GeraldA. (2002). A national security framework for Canada. In SegalH. (Ed.), Geopolitical integrity. Institute for Research on Public Policy.
36.
MilneG. (2016). Making policy: A guide to how the federal government works. Cognitus Associates.
37.
MorenoL. A.VillalbaE. R. (2018). Transdisciplinary design: Tamed complexity through new Collaboration. Strategic Design Research Journal, 11(1), 42-50.
38.
MünchR. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. Routledge.
39.
OkrosA. C. (2009). Becoming an employer of choice: Human resource challenges within DND and the CF. In StoneC. (Ed.), The public management of defence in Canada. Breakout Educational Network.
40.
PashlerH.HarrisC. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531-536.
41.
PetersB. G. (2015). State failure, governance failure and policy failure: Exploring the linkages. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 261-276.
42.
PolsterC. (2014). Vicious circle: Academic insecurity and privatization in western universities. In CôtéJ. E.FurlongA. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the sociology of higher education (pp. 94-103). Routledge.
43.
PostmanN. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Knopf.
44.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
45.
RobinsonJ. (2008). Being undisciplined: Transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1), 70-86.
46.
RowleyJ.JohnsonF.SbaffiL.FrassW.DevineE. (2017). Academics’ behaviors and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 1201-1211.
47.
SamaanJ. L. (2012). The RAND corporation (1989-2009): The reconfiguration of strategic studies in the United States. Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
ScrutonR. (2015). Scientism and the humanities. In WilliamsR. N.RobinsonD. N. (Eds.), Scientism: The new orthodoxy (pp. 131-146). Bloomsbury.
49.
SechserT. S.SaundersE. N. (2010). The army you have: The determinants of military mechanization, 1979-2001. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 481-511.
50.
SmithS. (2004). Singing our world into existence: International relations theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly, 48, 499-515.
51.
StephensonA. J. (2016). Canadian national security culture: Explaining post 9/11Canadian national security policy outcomes. [Doctoral dissertation, Carleton University].
52.
SubramaniamM.PerrucciR.WhitlockD. (2014). Intellectual closure: A theoretical framework linking knowledge, power, and the corporate university. Critical Sociology, 40(3), 411-430.
53.
WichertsJ. M. (2016). Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals. PLos One, 11(1), e0147913.
