Gender Mainstreaming in the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence: Lessons on the Implementation of Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2022
Gender Mainstreaming in the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence: Lessons on the Implementation of Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+)
This article uses the Canadian military’s gender-mainstreaming strategy—gender-based analysis plus (or GBA+)—as a case study to explore the implementation of gender mainstreaming in militaries. Utilizing a mixed method approach, including group interviews and surveys, we employ Jahan’s model of gender mainstreaming to understand how GBA+ has been operationalized. We argue that the implementation of GBA+ in the Defense Force constitutes a more superficial integrationist approach to the implementation of gender mainstreaming rather than a transformative, agenda-setting approach, despite the internalization of messaging to the contrary by many in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and the Department of National Defence (DND). While not ideal, we suggest that an integrationist approach does not necessarily mean a GBA+ agenda will fail in a male-dominated organization like the CAF; rather, we contend that it could constitute a valuable starting point for progressive, large-scale change.
BastickM. (2008). Integrating gender in post-conflict security sector reform (Policy Paper No. 29). Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).
2.
BastickM.DuncansonC. (2018). Agents of change? Gender advisors in NATO militaries. International Peacekeeping, 25(4), 554–577.
Canadian Armed Forces. (n.d.). Women in the Canadian Armed Forces. Canadian Armed Forces. Retrieved February 13, 2020, fromhttps://forces.ca/en/women-in-the-caf/
CornwallA.HarrisonE.WhiteheadA. (2007). Gender myths and feminist fables: The struggle for interpretive power in gender and development. Development and Change, 38(1), 1–20.
10.
DalyM. (2005). Gender mainstreaming in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12(3), 433–450.
11.
DavisK. (2009). Sex, gender and cultural intelligence in the Canadian Forces. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 47(4), 430–455.
HardtH.von HlatkyS. (2020). “NATO’s about-face: Adaptation to gender mainstreaming in an alliance setting.” Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 136–159.
26.
HurleyM. (2017). “Gender mainstreaming and integration in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” In WoodwardR.DuncansonC. (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of gender and the military (pp. 403–417). Springer.
27.
JahanR. (1995). The Elusive agenda: Mainstreaming women in development. University Press.
28.
JohnstoneR.MomaniB. (2019). Organizational change in Canadian public institutions: The implementations of GBA+ in DND/CAF. Canadian Public Administration, 62(3), 500–519.
29.
LaneA. (2017). Special men: The gendered militarization of the Canadian Armed Forces. International Journal, 72(4), 463–483.
PatersonS. (2010). What’s the problem with gender-based analysis? Gender mainstreaming policy and practice in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 53(3), 395–416.
37.
PoulinC.GouliquerL.McCutcheonJ. (2018). Violating gender norms in the Canadian military: The experiences of gay and lesbian soldiers. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(30), 60–73.
38.
PrescottJ. M. (2013). NATO gender mainstreaming and the feminist critique of the law of armed conflict. The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, XIV(I), 83–131.
39.
ScalaF.PatersonS. (2017a). Bureaucratic role perceptions and gender mainstreaming in Canada. Gender, Work and Organization, 24(6), 579–593.
40.
ScalaF.PatersonS. (2017b). Gender public policy or rationalizing gender? Strategic interventions and GBA+ practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 427–442.
41.
ScalaF.PatersonS. (2018). Stories from the front lines: Making sense of gender mainstreaming in Canada. Politics & Gender, 14, 208–234.
Status of Women Canada. (2017b). Interim progress report on the implementation of the gender-based analysis plus (GBA+) action plan. Retrieved December 28, 2017, fromhttps://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/progress-etape-en.html
TaberN. (2018). After Deschamps: Men, masculinities, and the Canadian Armed Forces. Journal of Military, Veteran, and Family Health, 4(1), 100–107.
47.
TiessenR. (2007). Everywhere/nowhere: Gender mainstreaming in development agencies. Kumarian Press.
48.
TiessenR.CarrierK. (2015). The erasure of “gender” in Canadian Foreign Policy under the harper conservatives: The significance of the discursive shift from “gender equality” to “equality between men and women.”Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 21(2), 95–111.
49.
United Nations. (1995). Beijing declaration and platform for action. United Nations Publication.
50.
United Nations Economics and Social Council. (1997). Coordination of the policies and activities of the specialized agencies and other bodies of the United Nations system (Chapter IV). https://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/ECOSOCAC1997.2.PDF
51.
VerlooM. (2005). Displacement and empowerment: Reflections on the concept and practice of the council of Europe approach to gender mainstreaming and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(3), 344–365.
52.
VermaR. (2014). Business as usual: The potential for gender transformative change in development and mountain contexts. International Mountain Society, 34(4), 188–196.
53.
WhitworthS. (2008). Militarized masculinity and post traumatic stress disorder. In ParpartJ.ZalewskiM. (Eds.), Rethinking the wo/man question in international relations (pp. 109–126). Zed Books.
54.
ZahariadisN.ExadaktylosT. (2016). Policies that succeed and programs that fail: Ambiguity, conflict, and crisis in Greek higher education. Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 59–82.
