Military scandals are disruptive episodes that can have long-lasting organizational consequences for military institutions. Recently, scholars who study military institutions have sought to understand this phenomenon and its significance. However, given their complexity and empirically opaque nature, military scandals are difficult to study, and a general account of this phenomenon has remained elusive. This article addresses this problem by drawing upon the growing field of scandal research to present a definition and account of the military scandal. We argue that military scandals are episodes of mediatized public moral conflict concerning transgressions involving the military institution, its members, and/or associated actors. We employ Ari Adut’s theory of public attention as a core explanation of scandal dynamics and effects and use this to argue that the military scandal phenomenon can be employed to simultaneously examine interactions and relationships between the military, the state, news media organizations, and civil society.
ApostolidisP.WilliamJ. (2004). Introduction: Sex scandals and discourses of power. In ApostolidisP.WilliamsJ (Eds.), Public affairs: Politics in the age of sex scandals (pp. 1–35). Durham, England: Duke University Press.
5.
ApostolidisP.WilliamJ. (2017). Sex scandals, reputational management, and masculinity under neoliberal conditions. Sexualities, 20, 793–814. doi:10.1177/1363460716658405
BaugutP. (2017). Moralism, constructivism, relativism: Identifying and describing the approaches of research on scandal. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism, 7, 1–7.
BurkhardtS. (2018). Scandals in the network society. In HallerA.MichaelH.KrausM. (Eds.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (pp. 18–44). Koln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
10.
ButlerI.DrakefordB. (2005). Scandal, social policy and social welfare (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
CornerJ.ParryK. (2017). The media and the military: Editorial. Media, Culture & Society, 39, 3–10.
13.
CouldryN. (2008). Mediatization of mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10, 373–391.
CrosbieT. (2015). Scandal and military mediatization. Media, War & Conflict, 8, 100–119. doi:10.1177/1750635214531108
16.
CrosbieT.KleykampM. (2018). Ethical lapses and the military profession: Three problems and a solution. Armed Forces & Society, 44, 748–757.
17.
CrosbieT.SassJ. (2017). Governance by scandal? Eradicating sexual assault in the US military. Politics, 37, 117–133. doi:10.1177/0263395716661342
18.
EnloeC. (2004). Wielding masculinity inside Abu Ghraib: Making feminist sense of an American military scandal. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 10, 89–102.
19.
EntmanR. (2000). Declarations of independence: The growth of media power after the cold war. In NacosB.ShapiroR. Y.IserniaP. (Eds.), Decisionmaking in a glass house: Mass media, public opinion, and American and European foreign policy in the 21st century (pp. 11–26). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
20.
EntmanR. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
21.
EntmanR. (2006). Punctuating the homogeneity of institutionalized news: Abusing prisoners at Abu Ghraib versus killing civilians at Fallujah. Political Communication, 23, 215–224. doi:10.1080/10584600600629844
22.
EntmanR. (2012). Scandal and silence: Media responses to presidential misconduct. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
23.
EsserF.HartungU. (2004). Nazis, pollution, and no sex political scandals as a reflection of political culture in Germany. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1040–1071. doi:10.1177/0002764203262277
24.
FeaverP. D. (1999). Civil–military relations. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 211–241.
25.
FineG. (1997). Scandal, social conditions, and the creation of public attention: Fatty Arbuckle and the ‘problem of Hollywood’. Social Problems, 44, 297–323. doi:10.2307/3097179
26.
GarfinkelH. (1956). Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 420–424. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2773484
27.
GlennonM. (2015). National security and double government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
GoffmanE. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London, England: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1959)
29.
Grey Report. (1998). Report of the review into policies and practices to deal with sexual harassment and sexual offences at ADFA. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.
30.
HabibaP. (2017). The Australian Defence Force Academy Skype sex scandal. Armed Forces & Society, 43, 300–321. doi:10.1177/0095327X16642040
31.
HallerA.MichaelH.KrausM. (Eds.). (2018). Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field. Koln, Germany: Herbert Von Halem Verlag.
32.
HarrisR. (2010). Dreyfus: Politics, emotion, and the scandal of the century. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
33.
HemmensC. (2008). American skin: The Duke lacrosse rape scandal and the intersection of race, class, gender, and injustice. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 297–306. doi:10.1007/s12103-008-9037-z
34.
HeppA. (2013). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything’. European Journal of Communication, 28, 615–629.
35.
HeppA.HjarvardS.LundbyK. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the interplay between media, culture and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37, 314–324.
36.
HoskinsA.O’LoughlinB. (2015). Arrested war: The third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society, 18, 1320–1338. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1068350
37.
JacobssonK.LöfmarkE. (2008). A sociology of scandal and moral transgression: The Swedish ‘Nannygate’ scandal. Acta Sociologica, 51, 203–216. doi:10.1177/0001699308094166
38.
JiménezF. (2004). The politics of scandal in Spain: Morality plays, social trust, and the battle for public opinion. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1099–1121. doi:10.1177/0002764203262279
39.
JohnsonJ. M. (2017). Beyond a politics of recrimination: Scandal, ethics and the rehabilitation of violence. European Journal of International Relations, 23, 703–726.
40.
KantolaA.VesaJ. (2013). Mediated scandals as social dramas. Acta Sociologica, 56, 295–308. doi:10.1177/0001699313477872
LowiT. (1988). Foreword. In MarkovitsA. S.SilversteinM. (Eds.), The politics of scandal (pp. vii–xii). New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
43.
LullJ.HinermanS. (1997). The search for scandal. In LullJ.HinermanS. (Eds.), Media scandals (pp. 1–33). Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
44.
MaltbyS. (2012a). The mediatization of the military. Media, War & Conflict, 5, 255–268.
45.
MaltbyS. (2012b). Military media management: Negotiating the ‘front’ line in mediatized war. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
MarkovitsA.SilversteinM. (1988). Introduction: Power and process in liberal democracies. In MarkovitsA. S.SilversteinM. (Eds.), The politics of scandal (pp. 1–12). New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.
47.
MolotchH.LesterM. (1974). News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39, 101–112. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2094279
48.
NixD. (2012). American civil–military relations: Samuel P. Huntington and the political dimensions of military professionalism. Naval War College Review, 65, 88–104.
PrinzJ. (2006). The emotional basis of moral judgements. Philosophical Explorations, 9, 29–43. doi:10.1080/13869790500492466
51.
ReadP. (2012). The Dreyfus affair: The scandal that tore France in two. London, England: Bloomsbury.
52.
RowlingC. M.SheetsP.JonesT. M. (2015). American atrocity revisited: National identity, cascading frames, and the My Lai massacre. Political Communication, 32, 310–330. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.944323
53.
SchudsonM. (1995). The power of news. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
54.
SetzekornE. (2014). Military reform in Taiwan: The Lafayette scandal, national defense law and all-volunteer force. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 21, 7–19.
55.
ThompsonJ. B. (1995). The media and modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
ThompsonJ. B. (2000). Political scandal. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
57.
ThompsonJ. B. (2005). The new visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22, 31–51. doi:10.1177/0263276405059413
58.
Thucydides. (1972). History of the Peloponnesian War (WarnerR., Trans.). London, England: Penguin Books.
59.
TiffenR. (1999). Scandals. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
60.
TravisD. S. (2017). Saving Samuel Huntington and the need for pragmatic civil–military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 43, 395–414.
61.
TravisD. S. (2018). Discovering the fault lines in American civil–military relations. Armed Forces & Society, 44, 731–747.
62.
TumberH.WaisbordS. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge companion to media and scandal. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
VerbalyteM. (2018). Deconstruction of the emotional logic of political scandal. In HallerA.MichaelH.KrausM. (Eds.), Scandalogy: An interdisciplinary field (pp. 62–87). Koln, Germany: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
64.
WadhamB. A. (2013). Brotherhood. Australian Feminist Studies, 28, 212–235. doi:10.1080/08164649.2013.792440
65.
WadhamB. A. (2016). The minister, the commandant and the cadets: Scandal and the mediation of Australian civil–military relations. Journal of Sociology, 52, 551–568. doi:10.1177/1440783316655637
66.
WaisbordS. (2004). Scandals, media, and citizenship in contemporary Argentina. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 1072–1098. doi:10.1177/0002764203262278
ZirkerD.RedingerM. (2003). The military, intelligence agencies, political scandals, and democracy in Brazil—1998-2000. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 31, 39–55.
