“The Soldier, the State, and the People—Costs and Benefits of Military Regimes”: Evaluating the Essay “Guns and Butter: Child Mortality and the Mediators of Militarization” raises several concerns about the theory and analyses in our article. We address what we see as the three most important: (1) the necessity of both qualitative and quantitative analyses in the study of militarization; (2) correlational versus causal analysis; and (3) the value of Huntington’s analysis of praetorian militarization. We have varying levels of agreement.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
2.
AndreskiS. (1968). Military organization and society (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BeckN. (2010). Time-series cross-section methods. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 475–493). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
Carlton-FordS.DuranteK. A.EvansT. D.GrahamC. (2019). Guns and butter: Child mortality and the mediators of militarization. Armed Forces & Society, 45, 177–197.
5.
CollierP. V. L.ElliottH.HegreA.HoefflerM.Reynal-QuerolSambanisN. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
6.
CollierP.SambanisN. (Eds.). (2005). Understanding civil war: Evidence and analysis. Volume 1: Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
7.
CyrA. (2019). The soldier, the state, and the people—Costs and benefits of military regimes: Evaluating the essay “Guns and Butter: Child Mortality and the Mediators of Militarization.”Armed Forces & Society, 45, 572–581.
8.
DahrendorfR. (1979). Life chances: Approaches to social and political theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. D. (2010). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. In Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.BradyH. E.CollierD. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 756–776). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
GaltungJ. (1985). Twenty-five years of peace research: Ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research, 22, 141–158.
11.
HadeniusA.TeorellJ. (2006). Authoritarian regimes: Stability, change, and pathways to democracy, 1972–2003(Working Paper #331). Kellogg Institute. Retrieved January 31, 2019, fromhttps://kellogg.nd.edu/documents/1639
12.
HedströmP.YlikoskiP. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.
13.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
14.
MacDonaldB. S. (1997). Military spending in developing countries: How much is too much?Ottawa, ON: Carleton University Press.
15.
NordlingerE. A. (1977). Soldiers in politics: Military coups and governments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16.
SenA. (2000). Freedom as development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
WahmanM.TeorellJ.HadeniusA. (2013). Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics, 19, 19–34.
18.
WeberM. (1946). Science as a vocation. In GerthH. H.MillsC. W. (Trans. & Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
