What Factors Influenced Turkish Military Officers’ and NCOs’ Motivation to Serve Prior to the July 2016 Coup Attempt?

Abstract

Motivation is a key factor for the military institution to accomplish its goals. Extant academic research, however, has generally focused on the combat motivation and the motivation to serve has been understudied. This study examines the motivation to serve and its predictors among Turkish military officers and NCOs. The aim of the current study is 2-fold: (1) to test the effectiveness of measures proposed by previous studies in Turkish Armed Forces and (2) to build on the existing body of knowledge by showing the impacts of perceived fairness and satisfaction with social benefits. Survey data, which were conducted only 2 months before the coup attempt in Turkey on July 15, 2016, were used to assess the motivation. Findings revealed that institutional and moral commitments, organizational responsiveness, perceived fairness, and satisfaction with social benefits were positive significant determinants of motivation to serve, while occupational commitment had a negative relationship with it.

Keywords

motivation to serve commitment Turkish Armed Forces Turkish military officers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battistelli

(1997). Peacekeeping and the postmodern soldier. Armed Forces & Society, 23, 467–484. doi:10.1177/0095327x9702300308

Ben-Dor

Pedahzur

(2006). Under the threat of terrorism: A reassessment of the factors influencing the motivation to serve in the Israeli reserves. Israel Affairs, 12, 430–438.

Ben-Dor

Pedahzur

Canetti-Nisim

Zaidise

Perliger

Bermanis

(2008). I versus we: Collective and individual factors of reserve service motivation during war and peace. Armed Forces & Society, 34, 565–592.

Ben-Dor

Pedahzur

Hasisi

(2002). Israel’s national security doctrine under strain: The crisis of the reserve army. Armed Forces & Society, 28, 233–255. doi:10.1177/0095327x0202800204

Bourg

Segal

M. W.

(1999). The impact of family supportive policies and practices on organizational commitment to the army. Armed Forces & Society, 25, 633–652.

Bremner

N. L.

Goldenberg

(2015). Leadership, perceived organizational support, and organizational commitment in the Canadian Armed Forces: The mediating role of person-organization fit. Turkish Journal of Sociology, 3, 145–168.

Burland

Lundquist

J. H.

(2013). The dynamic lives and static institutions of the “two armies”: Data from the survey of active duty personnel. Armed Forces & Society, 39, 78–101.

Caforio

(2006). Handbook of the sociology of the military. New York, NY: Springer.

Caglayandereli

M. D.

Arslan

Unal

R. N.

(2016). Justice perception and quality of life on sociological research. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 7, 319–347.

10.

Cofer

C. N.

Appley

M. H.

(1964). Motivation: Theory and research. New York, NY: John Wiley.

11.

Eighmey

(2006). Why do youth enlist? Identification of underlying themes. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 307–328.

12.

Esprit de corps. (2005). Merriam-Webster’s dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

13.

Fennell

(2014). In search of the ‘X’ factor: Morale and the study of strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 37, 799–828. doi:10.1080/01402390.2013.846856

14.

Griffith

(2002). Multilevel analysis of cohesion’s relation to stress, well-being, identification, disintegration, and perceived combat readiness. Military Psychology, 14, 217–239. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1403_3

15.

Griffith

(2008). Institutional motives for serving in the US Army National Guard—Implications for recruitment, retention, and readiness. Armed Forces & Society, 34, 230–258. doi:10.1177/0095327x06293864

16.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

17.

Kunter

(2014). Askeri Liderlik: Kavramlaştırma ve askeri liderin etkinliğinin ölçümüne ilişkin bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması [Military leadership: Conceptualization and a study of scale development for measuring of military leader effectiveness] (master’s thesis). Kara Harp Okulu, Ankara, Turkey.

18.

Latham

G. P.

Pinder

C. C.

(2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 485–516. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105

19.

Lebel

(2008). Communicating security: Civil-military relations in Israel. In Wyatt

T. C.

Gal

(Eds.), Legitimacy and commitment in the military (pp. 21–46). New York, NY: Routledge.

20.

Moskos

C. C.

(1976). Peace soldiers: The sociology of a United Nations military force. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Moskos

C. C.

(1977). From institution to occupation: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces & Society, 4, 41–50.

22.

Moskos

C. C.

Wood

F. R.

(Eds.). (1988). The military: More than just a job? New York, NY: Pergamon-Brassey’s.

23.

Newsome

(2003). The myth of intrinsic combat motivation. Journal of Strategic Studies, 26, 24–46.

24.

Öztürk

Teber

(2006). Kariyer yönetiminin çalısan motivasyonuna etkileri: Jandarma Havacılık Komutanlığı örneği [The effects of career management on employee motivation: Gendarmeria Aviation Command Headquarters sample]. Gazi Üniversitesi Endüstriyel Sanatlar Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, 67–91.

25.

Perry

Griffith

White

(1991). Retention of junior enlisted soldiers in the all-volunteer army reserve. Armed Forces & Society, 18, 111–133. doi:10.1177/0095327x9101800106

26.

Segal

M. W.

(1986). The military and the family as greedy institutions. Armed Forces & Society, 13, 9–38. doi:10.1177/0095327x8601300101

27.

Segal

M. W.

Segal

D. R.

Bachman

J. G.

Freedman-Doan

O’Malley

P. M.

(1998). Gender and the propensity to enlist in the US Military. Gender Issues, 16, 65–87.

28.

Taylor

J. K.

Clerkin

Ngaruiya

K. M.

Velez

A. K.

(2015). An exploratory study of public service motivation and the institutional–occupational model of the military. Armed Forces & Society, 41, 142–162.

29.

Ulusoy

(2016). Annual activity report. Oyak Dergisi, 131, 11–20.

30.

Unsaldi

Dabagci

(2012). Turkey’s professional soldiers: From top dog to subdued? Symbolism as a factor in the military’s old dominant position and recent political taming. Res Militaris, 2, 1–21.

31.

Warr

Bindl

U. K.

Parker

S. K.

Inceoglu

(2014). Four-quadrant investigation of job-related affects and behaviours. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 23(3), 342.

32.

Wakin

M. M.

(2000). Integrity first: Reflections of a military philosopher. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

33.

Woodruff

Kelty

Segal

D. R.

(2006). Propensity to serve and motivation to enlist among American combat soldiers. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 353–366. doi:10.1177/0095327x05283040