This Armed Forces & Society forum concentrates on broadening the perspective on military cohesion. This introduction, and the five articles that it acts as a preamble to, argues for the need to widen the scope of the recent debate on military cohesion, which in part took place in this very journal. This debate narrowly focused on Western state militaries during the 20th and 21st centuries and even then on the microlevel. The articles in this issue contribute to this broadening by exploring military cohesion in non-Western or nonmodern contexts, as well as through new methods, thus individually and collectively suggesting new ways forward to further our understanding of military cohesion.
AngstromJ. (2013). The changing norms of civil and military and civil-military relations theory. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 24, 224–236.
2.
BarkawiT. (2006). Culture and combat in the colonies: The Indian army in the Second World War. Journal of Contemporary History, 41, 325–355.
3.
BarkawiT. (2015). Subaltern soldiers: Essentialism, Eurocentricism and the nation-state in the combat motivation debates. In KingA. (Ed.), Frontline: Combat and cohesion in the twenty-first century (pp. 24–45). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
BultmannD. (2018). The social structure of armed groups. Reproduction and change during and after conflict. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29.
5.
ChirotD.McCauleyC. (2006). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
CokerC. (2017). Rebooting Clausewitz: “On War” in the twenty-first century. London, England: Hurst.
7.
Du PicqA. (2013). Battle studies—Ancient and modern battle. Forgotten Books.
8.
DuyvesteynI. (2017). Rebels & legitimacy; An introduction. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 28, 669–685.
9.
FullerJ. G. (1990). Troop morale and popular culture in the British and Dominion armies, 1914–1918. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
10.
GerwarthR.HorneJ. (Eds.). (2012). War in peace: Paramilitary violence in Europe after the Great War. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11.
HaldénP. (2018). Organized armed groups as ruling organizations. Armed Forces & Society, 44.
12.
HansenS. J. (2018). Unity under Allah? Cohesion mechanisms in Jihadist organizations in Africa. Armed Forces & Society, 44.
13.
HendersonW.D. (1985). Cohesion: the human element in combat: Leadership and societal influence in the armies of the Soviet Union, the United States, North Vietnam, and Israel. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.
14.
HonigJ. W. (2015, 12). The strategic cohesion of organised armed groups: Towards a historically informed (neo-medievalist) socio-normative approach. Paper presented at the Conference “The Origins of Military Cohesion: Broadening the Perspective”, Swedish Defence University, Sweden.
15.
JungerS. (2016). Tribe: On homecoming and belonging. London, England: 4th Estate.
16.
KäihköI. (2016). Bush Generals and Small Boy Battalions: Military Cohesion in Liberia and Beyond. Phd. diss.: Uppsala University.
17.
KäihköI. (2018a). Broadening the perspective on military cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 44.
18.
KäihköI. (2018b). The MODEL social structure of an armed group: from Liberian refugees to heroes of Côte d’Ivoire and liberators of the homeland. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29.
19.
KingA. (2006). The word of command: Communication and cohesion in the military. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 493–512.
20.
KingA. (Ed.). (2015). Frontline: Combat and cohesion in twenty-first century. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21.
MacCounR.KierE.BelkinA. (2006). Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces & Society, 32, 646–654.
22.
MaleševićS. (2017). The rise of organised brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23.
MannM. (1993). The sources of social power. Volume 2: The rise of classes and Nation States 1760–1914. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24.
NilssonM. (2018). Primary unit cohesion among the Peshmerga and Hezbollah. Armed Forces & Society, 44.
25.
RichardsonF. M. (1978). Fighting spirit. London, England: Leo Cooper.
26.
SchlichteK.SchneckenerU. (2015). Armed groups and the politics of legitimacy. Civil Wars, 17, 409–424.
27.
ShilsE. (1950). Primary groups in the American army. In MertonR.LazarsfeldP. (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of “The American soldier” (pp. 16–39). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
28.
SieboldG. L. (2007). The essence of military group cohesion. Armed Forces & Society, 33, 286–295.
29.
SieboldG. L.CrabbT.WoodwardR.KingA. C. (2016). Combat, cohesion, and controversy: Disputatio sine fine. Armed Forces & Society, 42, 449–462.
30.
Söderberg-KovacsM. (2008). When rebels change their stripes: Armed insurgents in post-war politics. In JarstadA.SiskT. (Eds.), From war to democracy: Dilemmas of peacebuilding (pp. 134–156). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Van CreveldM. (1991). The transformation of war. New York, NY: Free Press.
32.
VerweijenJ. (2018). Soldiers without an army? Patronage networks and cohesion in the armed forces of the DR Congo. Armed Forces & Society, 44.
