Special Operations Forces (SOFs) are increasingly central in national defense postures worldwide. The term “SOF mind-set” encapsulates the current political enthusiasm but is rarely explicitly defined or systematically studied. Based on a literature review, this article suggests a conceptual model of SOF’s mind-set, which is refined via a Danish case study. It discusses when and where this mind-set complicates collaboration with the wider military organizational environment and how SOF could navigate potential fault lines. By systematically unpacking SOF’s mind-set, the article aims to add nuance to polarized conceptions and stereotypes.
AdamsT. (1998). US special operations forces in America: The challenge of unconventional warfare. London, England: Frank Cass.
2.
CameronK. S.QuinnR. E. (2006). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed., Chap. 1, 2, 12). London, England: Sage.
4.
CottyW.BluesteinB.ThompsonJ. (2005). The whole-man concept: Assessing the SF soldier of the future. Special Operations Technology, 3, 68–72.
5.
DanielsenT. (2015). Making warriors in the global era: An anthropological study of institutional apprenticeship: selection, training, education and everyday life in the Norwegian Naval Special Operations Commando(PhD dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
6.
Danish Defence Agreement 2013–2017. (2012). Denmark, Copenhagen: Ministry of Defence.
7.
DweckC. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
8.
FinlanA. (2008). Special forces, strategy and the war on terror: Warfare by other means. London, England: Routledge.
9.
FitzsimmonsM. (2003). The importance of being special: Planning for the future of US special operations forces. Defense and Security Analysis, 19, 203–218. doi:10.1080/14751790320000118795
10.
GollwitzerP. M. (2012). Mindset theory of action phases. In LangeP. (Ed.), Theories of social psychology (pp. 526–545). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
11.
GrayC. (1998). Explorations in strategy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
JohnsenA.ChristensenG. (2016). Clarifying the antisystemic elements of special operations: A conceptual inquiry. Special Operations Journal, 2, 106–123. doi:10/1080/23296151.2016.1239983
13.
KingA. (2009). The special air service and the concentration of military power. Armed Forces & Society, 35, 646–666. doi:10/1177/0095327X08316149
14.
KirasJ. (2006). Special operations and strategy: From World War II to the war on terrorism. London, England: Routledge.
15.
LocherJ. R. (2002). Victory on the Potomac. The Goldwater-Nichols Act unifies the Pentagon. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
16.
LohausP. (2016). Special operations forces in the gray zone: An operational framework for using special operations forces in the space between war and peace. Special Operations Journal, 2, 75–91. doi:10.1080/23296151.2016.1239989
17.
MarquisS. (1997). Unconventional warfare: Rebuilding U.S. special operations forces. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
18.
MarshC.KirasJ.BlocksomeP. (2015). Special operations research: Out of the shadows. Special Operations Journal, 1, 1–6. doi:10-1080/23296151.1026779
19.
MaruyamaM. (1980). Mindscapes and science theories. Current Anthropology, 21, 589–608.
20.
MathiesenJ.-E.ArnulfJ. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial mindsets. The International Journal of Management and Business, 5, 81–97.
21.
MaylandK.HaugegaardR.ShapiroA. (2017). Thinkers at the cutting edge: Innovation in the Danish Special Forces. In ChristensenG. H. (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on special operations forces (pp. 88–107). Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal Danish Defence College.
22.
MelkonianT.PicqT. (2010). Opening the “black box” of collective competence in extreme projects: Lessons from the French Special Forces. Project Management Journal, 41, 79–90. doi:10.1002/pmj.20181
23.
RothsteinH. S. (2006). Afghanistan and the Troubled Future of Unconventional Warfare. New Delhi: Manas Publications.
24.
ShieldsP. M. (2011). An American perspective on 21st century expeditionary mindset and core values: A review of the literature. In FürstH.KümmelG. (Eds.), Core values and the expeditionary mindset: Armed forces in metamorphosis (pp. 17–34). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
25.
SimonsA. (1997). The company they keep: Life inside the U.S. army special forces. New York, NY: Free Press.
26.
SimonsA. (2004). The evolution of the SOF soldier: An anthropological perspective. In HornB.TaillonP.LastD. (Eds.), Forces of choice: Perspectives on special operations (pp. 79–91). Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queens University Press, Defence Management Series.
27.
SpulakR. (2009). A theory of special operations: The origin, qualities, and use of SOF. Military Technology, MILTECHSpecial Issue 2009, 23–29.
28.
StreetD.BurgessL. (2007). The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: Theory and methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
29.
TuckerD.LambC. (2007). United States special operations forces. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
30.
TurnleyJ. (2008). Retaining a precarious value as special operations go mainstream. Joint Special Operations University, 8, 1–33.
31.
TurnleyJ. (2011). Cross-cultural competence and small groups: Why SOF are the way SOF are. Joint Special Operations University, 11, 1–76.
32.
YargerH. R. (2006). Educating for strategic thinking in the SOF Community: Considerations and a proposal. Joint Special Operations University, 7, 1–38.
33.
YinR. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
