Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We show a statistically significant and quantitatively meaningful decline in the aptitude of commissioned officers in the marine corp from 1980 to 2014 as measured by their scores on the General Classification Test. This result contrasts with the widely studied increase in the quality of enlisted personnel since 1973 when conscription ended. As a possible cause for this decline, we focus on the fact that, during this period, marine officers had to have a 4-year college degree and there has been an expansion of the pool of young Americans in college. To corroborate this hypothesis, we show that there has been a similar decline in scores on the Armed Forces Qualification Test for responders to the 1979 and 1997 National Longitudinal Surveys of Youth among college graduates but not for the overall set of respondents.

Keywords

all-volunteer force (AVF)civil–military relations defense policy military organization recruitment/retention

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

M. T.

Bynum

B. H.

Oliver

J. T.

Russell

T. L.

Young

M. C.

Babin

N. E.

(2014). Predicting leadership performance and potential in the U.S. Army Officer Candidate School (OCS). Military Psychology, 26, 310–326.

Altonji

Bharadwaj

Lange

(2012, 10). Changes in the characteristics of American youth: Implications for adult outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics, 30, 783–828.

Bingham

W. V.

(1947). Military psychology in war and peace. Science, 106, 156.

Carey

Ramirez

(1993). The Marine Corps Job Performance Measurement (JPM) project: A bibliography. Arlington, VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

Friedman

(1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Gronke

Feaver

(2001). Uncertain confidence: Civilian and military attitudes about civil-military relations. In Feaver

Kohn

(Eds.), Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American National Security (pp. 154–157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Harrington

D. F.

(1993). An equal opportunity misconception and the accession/selection paradox. Marine Corps Gazette, 77, 38–42.

Hosek

(2010). The role of incentive pays in military compensation. RAND. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT345.html

Janowitz

Moskos

C. C.

Jr . (1974). Racial composition in the all-volunteer force. Armed Forces & Society, 1, 109–123.

10.

Long

(1992). Effect of variables independent of performance on promotion rates to major, lieutenant colonel, and colonel in the marine corps. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.

11.

Marine Corps Doctrinal Publication 1: Warfighting. (1997). Washington, DC: U.S. Marine Corps, 1997. Retrieved from http://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCDP%201%20Warfighting.pdf

12.

Marine Corps Order 1230.5B: Classification Testing, 4. Retrieved from http://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCO%201230.5B.pdf

13.

McGrevy

D. F.

Knouse

S. B.

Thompson

R. A.

(1974). Relationship among an individual intelligence test and two air force screening and selection tests. San Antonio, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory, Brooks Air Force Base.

14.

Murray

McDonald

(1999). Recent recruiting trends and their implications for models of enlistment supply. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

15.

Nalty

B. C.

Moody

R. F.

(1970). A brief history of U.S. Marine Corps officer procurement 1775-1969. Washington, DC: Historical Division, Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps.

16.

Palmer

R. R.

Wiley

B. I.

Keast

W. R.

(1948). The procurement and training of ground combat troops. Washington, DC: Historical Division, Department of the Army.

17.

Peele

R. B.

(1993). ‘Quality’ minority officer recruitment: An issue? Marine Corps Gazette, 77, 48–50.

18.

Perry

W. J.

(2006). The U.S. military under strain and at risk. Washington, DC: National Security Advisory Group.

19.

Plumer

(2013, 1 7). America’s staggering defense budget, in charts. Washington Post. Retrieved June 8, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/01/07/everything-chuck-hagel-needs-to-know-about-the-defense-budget-in-charts/?utm_term=.4b681adfae0b.

20.

Rostker

(2006). I want you. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

21.

Stoloff

(1983). Officer selection study (Center for Naval Analyses Report 53). Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analyses.

22.

Strotman

S. J.

(1993). Minority officer procurement and the OSO. Marine Corps Gazette, 77, 43–44.

23.

Uttl

Van Alstine

C. L.

(2003). Rising verbal intelligence scores: Implications for research and clinical practice. Psychology and Aging, 18, 616–621.

24.

Wiler

Hurndon

(2008). An analysis of performance at the basic school as a predictor of officer performance in the operating forces. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB