This study examines whether gender moderates the relationships between deployment and both organizational identification and pro-organizational behaviors. The broader context motivating this study is the U.S. military’s 2016 rescission of the ground combat exclusion, accomplishing full gender integration in the armed forces. Structural equation modeling is used to test for gender moderation effects. Results reveal deployment frequency, but not current deployment, has small effects on several pro-organizational behaviors. Results also show that gender does not moderate the effects of deployment frequency on soldiers’ perceptions of the organization or economic or social satisfaction. Gender does moderate the effects of deployment frequency on soldiers’ identification with the army. Additionally, while gender was not found to moderate the relationship between combat deployments and overall pro-organizational behaviors among soldiers, it does moderate the effect of deployments on one pro-organizational item: sacrificing behavior. Implications are discussed with an eye toward full gender inclusion in the U.S. military.
AdlerA. B.HuffmanA. H.BlieseP. D.CastroC. A. (2005). The impact of deployment length and experience on the well-being of male and female soldiers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 121.
2.
ArnettD. B.GermanS.HuntS. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67, 89–105.
BergamiM.BagozziR. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.
7.
BurrelliD. F. (2013). Women in combat: Issues for congress (Congressional Research Service report 7-5700, R42075). Retrieved June 26, 2014, fromhttp://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42075.pdf
8.
ByrneB. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
DempseyM. E.PanettaL. E. (2013). Elimination of the 1994 direct combat definition and assignment rule. Memorandum for Secretaries of the Military Departments, Acting Under Department of Defense Public Affairs, Defense Department Rescinds Direct Combat Exclusion Rule [Story No. NNS130124-10], January 24. Retrieved July 5, 2013, fromhttp://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=71623
12.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239–263.
13.
FiedlerN.OzakinciG.HallmanW.WartenbergD.BrewerN. T.BarrettD. H.KipenH. M. (2006). Military deployment to the gulf war as a risk factor for psychiatric illness among US troops. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 188, 453–459.
14.
FishbachA.FergusonM. (2011). The goal construct in social psychology. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsT. E. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, pp. 490–515. New York: The Guilford Press.
15.
GeyskensI.SteenkampJ. B. (2000). Economic and social satisfaction: Measurement and relevance to marketing channel relationships. Journal of Retailing, 76, 11–32.
16.
HochschildA. R. (1989/1997). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York, NY: Viking Penguin.
17.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
18.
KeltyR.SegalD. R. (2013). The military as a transforming social agent: Integration into or isolation from normal adult roles? In WilmothJ. M.LondonA. S. (Eds.), Life course perspectives on military service (pp. 19–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
KeltyR.SegalD. R.WoodruffT. (2011). Relative salience of family versus soldier role identity among combat soldiers. Annual Review of Political and Military Sociology, 38, 27–52.
20.
KennyD. A. (2016). Learn how you can do a mediation analysis and output a text description of your results. Retrieved July 1, 2016, fromhttp://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
21.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22.
LowryN. (2015). Women at war: A qualitative study of U.S. female military personnel, their journeys home, multiple deployments, and the effect of war. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN. Retrieved October 22, 2015, fromhttp://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3348/
23.
LuxtonD. D.SkoppN. A.MaguenS. (2010). Gender differences in depression and PTSD symptoms following combat exposure. Depression and Anxiety, 27, 1027–1033.
24.
MaelF. A. (1988). Organizational identification: Construct redefinition and a field application with organizational alumni. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
25.
MaelF. A.AshforthB. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
26.
MillerL. L. (1997). Not just weapons of the weak: Gender harassment as a form of protest for army men. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 32–51.
SegalM. W. (1986). The military and the family as greedy institutions. Armed Forces & Society, 13, 9–38.
32.
SnyderR. C. (2003). The citizen-soldier tradition and gender integration of the U.S. military. Armed Forces & Society, 29, 185–204.
33.
StetsJ. E.BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.
34.
VogtD.SmithB.ElwyR.MartinJ.SchultzM.DrainoniM. L.EisenS. (2011). Predeployment, deployment, and postdeployment risk factors for posttraumatic stress symptomatology in female and male OEF/OIF veterans. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 819.
35.
WadsworthS. M.SouthwellK. (2011). Military families extreme work and extreme “work-family”. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 638, 163–183.
WoodruffT.KeltyR. (2015). Gender effects on soldier value: Evidence in support of full gender integration in the US army [Special Issue: Women in the Military, Part 1]. Res Militaris, 5(S1), 1–23.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
