Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Arguments in favor of the topmost senior officers exercising “principled resignation” in opposition to policies, decisions, or orders that they find immoral, unethical, or disastrous for the country weaken the military profession and endanger American national security. A member of the Joint Chiefs, a combatant commander, or a topmost war commander who “resigns” would be injecting themselves improperly into a policy role, opposing civilian authority, and undermining civilian control of the military. The act would be politicizing for the military and likely fail to change what the officer opposes. Most importantly, their act of personal conscience would poison civil–military relations long into the future; civilian trust in military subordinates not to undermine support for policies and decisions with the public and other political leaders would decline. Even more than today, they would choose their senior military leaders for compatibility and agreement above other traits.

Keywords

civil–military relations command/control defense policy professionalism/leadership

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Avins

. (1962–1963). Right of military officers to resign: An historical footnote. George Washington Law Review, 31, 431–461.

Axelrod

(2015). Believer: My forty years in politics. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

Bacevich

(1997). The paradox of professionalism: Eisenhower, Ridgway, and the challenge to civilian control, 1953-1955. Journal of Military History, 61, 303–334.

Bland

L. I.

(Ed.). (1991). George C. Marshall interviews and reminiscences for Forrest C. Pogue (Rev. ed.). Lexington, VA: George C. Marshall Research Foundation.

Burk

(2009). Responsible disobedience by military professionals: The discretion to do what is wrong. In Nielsen

S. E.

Snider

D. M.

(Eds.), American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era (pp. 149–171). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bush

G. W.

(2010). Decision points. New York, NY: Crown.

Clifford

G. M.

III . (2007). Duty at all costs. Naval War College Review, 60, 103–128.

Cohen

E. C.

(2002). Supreme command: soldiers, statesmen, and leadership in wartime. New York, NY: The Free Press.

Coletta

P. E.

(1979). Admiral Bradley A. Fiske and the American navy. Lawrence, KS: The Regents Press of Kansas.

10.

Cook

M. L.

(2004). The moral warrior: Ethics and service in the U.S. military. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

11.

Cook

M. L.

(2008). Revolt of the generals: A case study in professional ethics. Parameters, 38, 4–15.

12.

Dubik

J. M.

(2014). On principled resignation: A response. Foreign Policy.com. The Best Defense. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/10/14/on-principled-resignation-a-response/

13.

Dubik

J. M.

(2015a). Civilian, military both morally obliged to make war work. Army Magazine. Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.armymagazine.org/2015/10/19/civilian-military-both-morally-obliged-to-make-war-work/

14.

Dubik

J. M.

(2015b). No avoiding moral responsibility in war: Is there ever a time to resign? Army Magazine. Retrieved January 13, 2015, from http://www.armymagazine.org/2015/01/13/no-avoiding-moral-responsibility-in-war-is-there-ever-a-time-to-resign/

15.

Dubik

J. M.

(2015c, 10 31). Taking a “pro” position on principled resignation. IUS biennial meeting, Chicago, IL.

16.

Feaver

P. D.

(2011). The right to be right: Civil-military relations and the Iraq surge decision. International Security, 35, 89–124.

17.

Feaver

P. D.

(2015, 10 31). Resign in protest? A cure worse than most diseases. IUS biennial meeting, Chicago, IL.

18.

Fiske

B. A.

(1919). From midshipman to rear-admiral. New York, NY: The Century Co.

19.

Gates

R. M.

(2014). Duty: Memoirs of a secretary at war. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

20.

Golby

(2015). Beyond the resignation debate: A new framework for civil-military dialogue. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 9, 18–46.

21.

Hadley

(2015). An interview with Stephen Hadley. Prism, 5, 146–158.

22.

Kohn

R. H.

(Ed.). (2001). The early retirement of general Ronald R. Fogleman, Chief of Staff, United States air force. Aerospace Power Journal, 15, 6–23.

23.

Kohn

R. H.

(2002). The erosion of civilian control of the military in the United States today. Naval War College Review, 55, 9–59.

24.

Kohn

R. H.

(2009). Building trust: Civil-military relations for effective national security. In Nielsen

S. E.

Snider

D. M.

, (Eds.), American civil-military relations: The soldier and the state in a new era (pp. 264–289, 379–389). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

25.

McChrystal

(2013). My share of the task: A memoir. New York, NY: Penguin.

26.

Snider

D. M.

(2014). Strategic insights: Should General Dempsey resign? Army professionals and the moral space for military dissent. SSI: Strategic Studies Institute, United States Army War College. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/index.cfm/articles//Should-General-Dempsey-Resign/2014/10/21

27.

Snider

D. M.

(2015a). Strategic insights: A new era in civ-mil relations: Rendering advice to those who do not want it. SSI: Strategic Studies Institute. United States Army War College. Retrieved November 2, 2015, from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/index.cfm/articles//A-New-Era-in-Civ-Mil-Relations/2015/11/02

28.

Snider

D. M.

(2015b, 10 31, 2015). Dissent, resignation, and the moral agency of senior military professionals. IUS biennial meeting, Chicago, IL.

29.

Woodward

(2008). The war within: A secret White House history 2006-2008. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

8.22 MB

On Resignation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material