Since the cold war and according to the period, the necessity of adaptation of the reserve force has resulted in different arguments (change of values, delegitimation of the conscript system, economical reasons, etc.). J. G. Bachman, J. D. Blair, and D. R. Segal, The All-Volunteer Force: A Study of Ideology in the Military (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1977); A. Biderman, ‘‘What Is Military?’’ in The Draft: A Handbook of Facts and Alternatives, ed. S. Tax (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967), 122-37; B. Boëne, ‘‘How Unique Should the Military Be? A Review of Representative Literature and Outline of a Synthetic Formulation,’’ Archives européennes de sociologie 31, 1 (1990): 3-59; B. Boëne and C. Dandeker, eds., Les armées en Europe (Paris: la découverte, 1998); B. Boëne and M.-L. Martin, eds., Conscription et armée de métier (Paris: FEDN/La Documentation Française, 1991); J. Burk, ‘‘The Decline of Mass Armed Forces and Compulsory Military Service,’’ Defense Analysis 8 (1992): 45-49; K. Haltiner, ‘‘The Decline of the European Mass Armies,’’ in Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, ed. G. Caforio (New York, Kluwer, 2003), 361-84; G. Harries-Jenkins, ‘‘Le cas britannique: trois décennies d’armée de métier,’’ in Boëne and Martin, Conscription et armée de métier, 70-95; C. Kelleher, ‘‘Mass Armies in the 1970s: The Debate in Western Europe,’’ Armed Forces & Society 5, 1 (1978): 3-30; A. King, ‘‘The Postfordist Military,’’ Journal of Political and Military Sociology 34, 2 (2006): 359-74; R. H. Kohn, ‘‘Out of Control: The Crisis in Civil-Military Relations,’’ National Interest 35 (1994): 3-17; A. Martel, ‘‘L’esprit de défense à l’épreuve des ruptures: perspectives historiques,’’ Actes du colloque des 2 et 3 avril 1997, L’esprit de défense à l’épreuve des ruptures (Paris: Les documents du C2SD, 1998); M.-L. Martin, ‘‘Conscription and the Decline of the Mass Army in France, 1960-1975,’’ Armed Forces & Society 4 (1977): 355-406; M.-L. Martin, ‘‘Le déclin de l’armée de masse en France. Note sur quelques paramètres organisationnels,’’ Revue Française de Sociologie 22, 1 (1981): 87- 116; C. Moskos, ‘‘From Institution to Occupation: Trends in Military Organization,’’ Armed Forces & Society 4 (1977): 41-50; D. R. Segal, J. Blair, F. Newport, and S. Stephens, ‘‘Convergence, Isomorphism and Interdependence at the Civil-Military Interface,’’ Journal of Political and Military Sociology 2 (1974): 157-72; H. Strachan, ed., The British Army: Manpower and Society into the 21st Century (London: Frank Cass, 2000); J. Van Doorn, The Soldier and Social Change (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1975).