As an epilogue to the present volume, this article picks up its central themes. It elaborates some of the main points about casualty aversion that are made in the preceding contributions. At the same time, by adding its own themes and insights, this article is complementary in character. It focuses on how a “good” military death is defined by cultural scripts and how, in accordance with those scripts, death is dealt with by the military organization and its guild of experts. Cultural scripts change over time and may differ from one society to another. As a consequence, the practices of dealing with military death may differ too. Generally speaking, though, military organizations throughout the West echo the ways in which casualties nowadays are looked upon by parent societies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Eyal Ben-Ari and Efrat El-Ron, “Blue Helmets and White Armor: Multi-Nationalism and Multiculturalism among UN Peacekeeping Forces,”City and Society13, 2 (2002): 271–302; Efrat El-Ron, Boas Shamir, and Eyal Ben-Ari, “Why Don’t They Fight Each Other? Cultural Diversity and Operational Unity in Multinational Forces,” Armed Forces & Society 26, 1 (1999): 73–98; Michael Ignatieff, The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience (London: Chatto and Windus, 1998).
2.
Bernard Boene, “Trends in the Political Control of Post-Cold War Armed Forces,” in Democratic Societies and Their Armed Forces: Israel in a Comparative Perspective, ed. Stuart A. Cohen (London: Frank Cass, 2000), 75–75; John MacKinlay, The Peace-keepers: An Assessment of Peacekeeping Operations at the Arab-Israeli Interface (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989).
3.
Charles Moskos, “Toward a Postmodern Military?” in Democratic Societies and Their Armed Forces, 5–5.
4.
Bernard Boene, “How Unique Should the Military Be? A Review of Representative Literature and Outline of Synthetic Formulation,”European Journal of Sociology31, 1 (1990): 3–59; Pierre Bourdieu, “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field,” in State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn, ed. George Steinmetz (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), 58–59.
5.
Morris Janowitz, The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait (New York: The Free Press, 1971); Eyal Ben-Ari, Mastering Soldiers: Conflict, Emotions and the Enemy in an Israeli Military Unit (Oxford: Berghahn, 1998).
6.
Paul T. Bartone and Morten G. Ender, “Organizational Responses to Death in the Military,”Death Studies18 (1994): 26–26.
7.
Vered Vinitzky-Seroussi and Eyal Ben-Ari, “A Knock on the Door: Managing Death in the Israeli Defence Forces,”The Sociological Quarterly41, 3 (2000): 391–412.
8.
Christopher Bellamy, Knights in White Armour: The New Art of War and Peace (London: Random House1996); James Burk, “Introduction: Ten Years of New Times,” in The Adaptive Military: Armed Forces in a Turbulent World, ed. James Burk (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1998): 12; John H. Faris, “The Looking-Glass Army: Patriotism in the Post-Cold War Era,” Armed Forces & Society 21, 3 (1995): 411– 134; Charles C. Moskos, John Allen Williams, and David R. Segal, “Armed Forces after the Cold War,” in The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War, ed. Charles Moskos, John Allen Williams, and David R. Segal (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 5–6.
9.
Maurice Bloch and Jonathan Parry, “Introduction: Death and the Regeneration of Life,” in Death and the Regeneration of Life, ed. M. Block and J. Parry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982): 3–4.
10.
Peter Berger, The Social Reality of Religion (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1967): 32–33.
11.
Ibid., 52.
12.
Mary P. Tyler and Robert K. Gifford, “Fatal Training Accidents: The Military Unit as a Recovery Context,”Journal of Traumatic Stress4, 2 (1991): 245–245.
13.
Vinitzky-Seroussi and Ben-Ari, “A Knock.”
14.
Renato Rosaldo, Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989), 2–2.
15.
Howard E. Aldrich, Organizations and Environments (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979).
16.
Paul T. Bartone and Kathleen M. Wright, “Grief and Group Recovery following a Military Air Disaster,”Journal of Traumatic Stress3 (1990): 523–539.
17.
Jeffrey G. Snodgrass, “Beware of Charitable Souls: Contagion, Roguish Ghosts and the Poison(s) of Hindu Alms,”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute7 (2001): 689–689.
18.
Henry Abramovitch, “Good Death and Bad Death,” in Traumatic and Nontraumatic Loss and Bereavement, ed. Ruth Malkinson, Nissan Rubin, and Eliezer Witztum (New York: Psychosocial Press, 1990); Bloch and Parry, “Introduction”; Barney G. Glazer and Anselm L. Strauss, Time for Dying (Chicago: Aldine, 1968); Ignatieff, The Warrior’s Honor; Nadia Seremetakis, The Last Word: Women, Death and Divination in Inner Mani (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), 101.
19.
Bartone and Enders, “Organizational Response.”
20.
Almog Oz, The Sabra: A Profile (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 1997) [Hebrew].
21.
Sabine Frühstück and Eyal Ben-Ari, “‘Now We Show It All!’ Normalization and the Management of Violence in Japan’s Armed Forces,”Journal of Japanese Studies28, 1 (2002): 1–39.
22.
Ignatieff, The Warrior’s Honor.
23.
Tyler and Gifford, “Fatal Training.”
24.
Barbara Adam, “Perceptions of Time,” in Encyclopedia of Social Anthropology, ed. Tim Ingold (London: Routledge, 1994), 503–526.
25.
Victor Turner, The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Nedembu Ritual (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1967), 97–98.
26.
Tyler and Gifford, “Fatal Training,”243–244.
27.
Bartone and Ender, “Organizational Response,”33–34.
28.
This section is based on Vinitzky-Seroussi and Ben-Ari, “A Knock.”
29.
Jonathan Parry, “Sacrificial Death and Necrophagous Ascetic,” in Death and the Regeneration of Life (see note 9), 74–110; Snodgrass, “Beware.”
30.
Bartone and Ender, “Organizational Response.”
31.
Ibid., 32.
32.
Morten G. Ender and Joan M. Hermsen, “Working with the Bereaved: U.S. Army Experiences with Nontraditional Families,”Death Studies20 (1996): 359–359.
33.
Morten G. Ender, Mady Wechsler-Segal, and Sandra Carson-Stanley, “Role Conformity and Creativity: Soldiers as Administrators and Caregivers after Loss,”Death Studies23 (1999): 14–15.
34.
Vinitzky-Seroussi and Ben-Ari, “A Knock.”
35.
Gareth Morgan, Images of Organization (London: Sage, 1986), 82–82.
