Aggregate interlock joints spaced to control cracking in plain slab designs afford the most economical method of joint design. This design can be improved and its use extended with skewed joints, randomized joint spacings and cement-treated subbase for additional slab and joint support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WestergaardH. M., “Stresses in Concrete Pavements Computed by Theoretical Analysis,”Public Roads, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1926, (pp. 25 to 35).
2.
WestergaardH. M., “Analysis of Stresses in Concrete Roads Caused by Variations in Temperature,”Public Roads, Vol. 8, No. 3, May 1927, (pp. 201 to 215).
3.
PickettGeraldRayGordon K., “Influence Charts for Concrete Highways,”Transactions, ASCE, Paper No. 2425, Vol. 116, 1951, (p. 49).
4.
TellerL. W.SutherlandE. C., “The Structural Design of Concrete Pavements,”Public Roads, Vol. 16, Nos. 8, 9 and 10; Vol. 17, Nos. 7 and 8; Vol. 23, So. 8.
5.
KelleyE. F., “Applications of the Results of Research to the Structural Design of Concrete Pavement,”Public Roads, Vol. 20, No. 5, July 1939.
6.
SutherlandE. C.CashellH. D., “Structural Efficiency of Transverse Weakened Plane Joints,”Highway Research Board, Research Report, 3B, 1945, (pp. 89–108).
7.
OlderClifford, “Highway Research in Illinois,”Proceedings, ASCE, February 1924, (p. 175).
8.
“Road Test One-MD,”Highway Research Board, Special Report No. 4.
9.
“The AASHO Road Test, Report 5, Highway Research Board, Special Report 61 E.
10.
AndersonA. A., “Expansion Joint Practice in Highway Construction,”Transactions, ASCE, Paper No. 2384, Vol. 114, 1949.
11.
Subgrades, Subbases and Shoulders for Concrete Pavements, Portland Cement Association, Chicago, III.
12.
WoodsK. B., Highway Engineering Handbook, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1960, (pp. 23–13 to 23–15).
13.
Joint Design for Concrete Pavements, Portland Cement Association, Chicago, III.
14.
FordycePhilTeskeW. E., “Some Relationships of the AASHO Road Test to Concrete Pavement Design,” presented at Highway Research Board, Record No. 44, pp. 35–70, 1963.
15.
CooleyR. H., “The Case for Skewed Joints,”Highway Research Board, Bulletin 274, 1960.
16.
HalmHarold J., “An Analysis of Factors Influencing Concrete Pavement Costs,”Highway Research Board, Bulletin 340, 1962, (pp. 40–59).
17.
FordycePhil, “New Procedures for Thickness Design of Concrete Pavements,”Proceedings, Third Paving Conference, Civil Engineering Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, N. M., 1965.
18.
Thickness Design for Concrete Pavements, Portland Cement Association, Chicago, Illinois.
19.
ChildsL. D., “Tests of Concrete Pavement Slabs on Cement-Treated Subbases,”Highway Research Board Record No. 60, 1964, (pp. 39–58).
20.
ColleyB. E.NowlenJ. W., “Performance of Subbases for Concrete Pavements Under Repetitive Loading,”Highway Research Board, Bulletin 202, 1958, (pp. 32–58).
21.
ColleyB. E.HumphreyH. A., “Aggregate Interlock at Joints in Concrete Pavements,” presented at Highway Research Board, 46th Annual Meeting, January 16–20, 1967.