Traditional cushioning materials (such as EPS and EPE) cause severe microplastic pollution due to their non-biodegradability. It is crucial to develop alternative materials that combine excellent cushioning performance with biodegradability. In this study, a novel planetary centrifugal mixing technology was adopted to prepare the high-filling coniferous wood pulp/polyurethane composite buffer material (HAS-X), achieving the uniform dispersion of up to75 wt. % pulp and constructing the interpenetrating network structure of “rigid fiber skeleton - flexible elastomer”. Experiments show that the maximum impact force of HAS-25% and HAS-50% samples in the drop ball impact test is 40%-60% lower than that of traditional materials, and they have excellent energy dissipation characteristics. HAS-75% achieves the lowest density (0.1234 g/cm3) among HAS-X series, enabling lightweight biodegradation while maintaining thermal conductivity of 0.025 W/(m·K), with outstanding heat insulation performance. The soil burial degradation experiment shows that the biodegradation rate of the material exceeds 50% within 100 days, and the degradation rate is positively correlated with the increase of pulp content. Studies have proved that HAS-X composite materials are significantly superior to traditional petroleum-based materials in terms of mechanical strength, energy absorption efficiency, heat insulation and biodegradability, providing key technologies and theoretical support for solving white pollution and promoting the industrialization of green cushion-absorbing packaging materials.
AkhbarizadehRDobaradaranSTorkmahallehFF, et al.Suspended fine particulate matter (PM2.5), microplastics (MPs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air: their possible relationships and health implications. Environ Res2021; 192: 110339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110339
2.
ZengGSuYJiangJ, et al. Nitrogenative degradation of polystyrene waste. J Am Chem Soc. 2025; 147(3): 2737–2746.
3.
Juan-PoloAMaestre PerezSEMonedero PrietoM, et al.Double-function oxygen scavenger and aromatic food packaging films based on LDPE/Polybutadiene and peanut aroma. Polymers2021; 13(8): 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13081310
4.
KatnicSPGuptaRK. From biofilms to biocatalysts: innovations in plastic biodegradation for environmental sustainability. J Environ Manag2025; 374: 124192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124192
LaiNYGKuahATKimCH, et al.Toward sustainable express deliveries for online shopping: reusing packaging materials through reverse logistics. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev2022; 64(4): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22259
TaoXOuyangHZhouA, et al.Polyethylene degradation by a Rhodococcus strain isolated from naturally weathered plastic waste enrichment. Environ Sci Technol2023; 57(37): 13901–13911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03778
14.
KurniawanSBSaidNSMImronMF, et al.Microplastic pollution in the environment: insights into emerging sources and potential threats. Environ Technol Innov2021; 23: 101790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101790
15.
AnagnostiLVarvaresouAPavlouP, et al.Worldwide actions against plastic pollution from microbeads and microplastics in cosmetics focusing on European policies. Has the issue been handled effectively?Mar Pollut Bull2021; 162: 111883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111883
16.
AllenSAllenDPhoenixVR, et al.Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nat Geosci2019; 12(5): 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0335-5
17.
AutaHSEmenikeCUFauziahSH. Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environ Int2017; 102: 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.013
18.
ColeMWebbHLindequePK, et al.Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Sci Rep2014; 4(1): 4528. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04528
DehautAHermabessiereLDuflosG. Current frontiers and recommendations for the study of microplastics in seafood. Trends Anal Chem2019; 116: 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.011
YadavSGuptaEPatelA, et al.Unravelling the emerging threats of microplastics to agroecosystems. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol2022; 21(3): 771–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09621-4
24.
de Souza MachadoAAKloasWZarflC, et al.Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Glob Change Biol2018; 24(4): 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020
25.
WitczakAPrzedpełskaLPokorska-NiewiadaK, et al.Microplastics as a threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Toxics2024; 12(8): 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12080571
26.
YuRSSinghS. Microplastic pollution: threats and impacts on global marine ecosystems. Sustainability2023; 15(17): 13252. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713252
27.
FerreiraSMonteiroEBritoP, et al.Biomass resources in Portugal: current status and prospects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 78: 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.140
28.
ZhaiYLiJLiS, et al. Photoluminescent materials from woody biomass resources. Trends Chem. 2024; 6(12): 753–767.
29.
ZhaoWGeQLiH, et al.Catalyst-free valorization of biomass resources to value-added products. Green Chem2024; 26(15): 8550–8563. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4gc01541j
JunfengLRunqingHYanqinS, et al.Assessment of sustainable energy potential of non-plantation biomass resources in China. Biomass Bioenergy2005; 29(3): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.03.006
32.
YiTZhaoHMoQ, et al.From cellulose to cellulose nanofibrils—A comprehensive review of the preparation and modification of cellulose nanofibrils. Materials2020; 13(22): 5062. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225062
33.
ShaghalehHXuXWangS. Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives. RSC Adv2018; 8(2): 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra11157f
34.
BiYLuoXYinY, et al.Robust, stable cooling cellulose composite: coupling nano-SiO2 and cellulose acetate in natural cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol2018; 277: 133728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133728
35.
SpinuMDos SantosNLe MoigneN, et al.How does the never-dried state influence the swelling and dissolution of cellulose fibers in aqueous solvent?Cellulose2011; 18: 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9485-8
36.
FernandesDJMBGilMHCastroJAAA. Hornification—Its origin and interpretation in wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol2004; 37: 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-003-0216-2
37.
KimYHuhPYooSI. Mechanical reinforcement of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites by surface‐modified Nanocellulose. Macromol Chem Phys2023; 224(4): 2200383. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.202200383
38.
FontanaDRecupidoFLamaGC, et al.Effect of different methods to synthesize polyol-grafted-cellulose nanocrystals as inter-active filler in bio-based polyurethane foams. Polymers2023; 15(4): 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040923
39.
LiWWuYLiangW, et al.Reduction of the water wettability of cellulose film through controlled heterogeneous modification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6(8): 5726–5734. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500341s
40.
HouDTanHLiM, et al.Synthesis of thermoplastic cellulose grafted polyurethane from regenerated cellulose. Cellulose2020; 27(12): 8667–8679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03389-y
41.
DinhVNThi TranHDuy NguyenT. Characterization of polypropylene green composites reinforced by cellulose fibers extracted from rice straw. Int J Polym Sci2018; 2018(1): 1813847.
42.
YangWZhuYLiuT, et al.Multiple structure reconstruction by dual dynamic crosslinking strategy inducing self-reinforcing and toughening the Polyurethane/Nanocellulose elastomers. Adv Funct Mater2023; 33(12): 2213294. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202213294
43.
PantelicBSkaro BogojevicSMilivojevicD, et al.Set of small molecule polyurethane (PU) model substrates: ecotoxicity evaluation and identification of PU degrading biocatalysts. Catalysts2023; 13(2): 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020278
44.
CorapiAGalloLLucadamoL, et al.Evaluation of the ecotoxicity of new polyurethane composites on target organisms for aquatic and atmospheric environments. Environ Toxicol Chem2023; 42(2): 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5532
