This study investigates how different cooling rates affect the thermal and structural properties of high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) reinforced with silicon (Si) nanoparticles. Nanocomposites were synthesized through solution mixing and hot pressing, then cooled under three conditions: slow cooling (SC-HIPS + Si), cooling in iced water (WC-HIPS + Si), and cooling in liquid nitrogen (NC-HIPS + Si). Thermal behavior was characterized via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Structural changes were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). TGA results reveal that early-stage thermal decomposition (temperatures corresponding to 5% and 50% mass loss) is highly sensitive to cooling rates, whereas later-stage decomposition (temperature corresponding to 93% mass loss) remains relatively unaffected. Additionally, the temperature of maximum mass loss, the maximum rate of mass loss, and the glass transition temperature of the HIPS matrix show a strong dependence on cooling rate. These findings are interpreted in the context of free volume theory and the enhanced segmental motion of the HIPS chains, with XRD and SEM analyses further elucidating how cooling rate influences nanocomposite morphology.
SekharVCNampoothiriKMMohanAJ, et al.Microbial degradation of high impact polystyrene (HIPS), an e-plastic with decabromodiphenyl oxide and antimony trioxide. J Hazard Mater2016; 318: 347–354. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.008.
2.
WangRMeyerC. Performance of cement mortar made with recycled high impact polystyrene. Cement Concr Compos2012; 34(9): 975–981. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.06.014.
3.
SieradzkaMFabiaJBiniaśD, et al.High-impact polystyrene reinforced with reduced graphene oxide as a filament for fused filament fabrication 3D printing. Materials2021; 14(22): 7008. DOI: 10.3390/ma14227008.
4.
ThuongNTLamNBSonPA, et al.Preparation and characterization of thermally conductive high impact polystyrene/ALN composite. International Journal of Polymer Science2024; 2024: 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2024/2723981.
5.
WangGZhaoGDongG, et al.Lightweight, thermally insulating, and low dielectric microcellular high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) foams fabricated by high-pressure foam injection molding with mold opening. J Mater Chem C Mater2018; 6(45): 12294–12305. DOI: 10.1039/c8tc04248a.
6.
JiaYZhangHYangB, et al.No temperature dependence of thermal conductivity of high impact polystyrene/Cu alloy composites: effective medium theory study. J Alloys Compd2023; 947: 169519. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169519.
7.
RamazanovMAShirinovaHANuriyevaSG, et al.Structure and optic properties of the nanocomposites based on polypropylene and amorphous silica nanoparticles. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2021; 36(4): 1762–1774. DOI: 10.1177/08927057211028890.
8.
RamazanovMAShirinovaHAHuseynzadeNA, et al.Enhancement of the PL intensity of silica based polymer electret after electro-thermo-polarization. Integrated Ferroelectrics Int J2021; 213(1): 158–164. DOI: 10.1080/10584587.2020.1859833.
9.
RamazanovMAHajiyevaFVBabayevY, et al.Synthesis and optical properties of PVC-CdS-based nanocomposites. J Elastomers Plast2019; 52(2): 159–166. DOI: 10.1177/0095244319827989.
10.
IbrahimovaHSShirinovaHARzayevRM, et al.Change of thermophysical parameters of polypropylene-metal oxide nanocomposite (polypropylene + ZrO2) after electric field influence. Polym Polym Compos2022; 30: 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/09673911221104484.
11.
RamazanovMAMaharramovAMHajiyevaFV, et al.The effect of the temperature–time mode of crystallization on the morphology and thermal properties of nanocomposites based on polypropylene and magnetite (Fe3O4). J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater2018; 28: 1171–1177. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-017-0767-6.
12.
RamazanovMAShirinovaHAHajiyevaFV, et al.Influence of temperature-time mode of crystallization on electrophysical characteristics of the polypropylene/magnetite nanocomposite. Integrated Ferroelectrics Int J2019; 201(1): 218–223. DOI: 10.1080/10584587.2019.1668712.
13.
RamazanovMAIbrahimovaHSShirinovaHA. Influence of temperature-time crystallization conditions on PP+ZrO2 charge state and electret properties. Ferroelectrics2021; 577(1): 153–160. DOI: 10.1080/00150193.2021.1916358.
14.
YuMQiLChengL, et al.The effect of cooling rates on thermal, crystallization, mechanical and barrier properties of rotational molding Polyamide 11 as the liner material for high-capacity high-pressure vessels. Molecules2023; 28(6): 2425. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062425.
15.
WellenRMRRabelloMSJúniorICA, et al.Melting and crystallization of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate): effect of heating/cooling rates on phase transformation. Polímeros2015; 25(3): 296–304. DOI: 10.1590/0104-1428.1961.
16.
GórnyMKawalecMGraczB, et al.Influence of cooling rate on microstructure formation of SI–MO ductile iron castings. Metals2021; 11(10): 1634. DOI: 10.3390/met11101634.
17.
SperanzaVSalomoneRPantaniR. Effects of pressure and cooling rates on crystallization behavior and morphology of isotactic polypropylene. Crystals2023; 13(6): 922. DOI: 10.3390/cryst13060922.
18.
KatančićZTravaš-SejdićJHrnjak-MurgićZ. Study of flammability and thermal properties of high-impact polystyrene nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stabil2011; 96(12): 2104–2111. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.09.020.
19.
DingLJiaZSunH, et al.Estimation of mechanical performance, thermal stability and flame retardancy of high-impact polystyrene/surface-modified APP/carboxylic-functionalized MWCNTs nanocomposites. Polymers2019; 11(4): 615. DOI: 10.3390/polym11040615.
20.
ZieleckaMRabajczykA. Silicone nanocomposites with enhanced thermal resistance: a short review. Materials2024; 17(9): 2016. DOI: 10.3390/ma17092016.
21.
FarhaAHNaimAFAMansourSA. Thermal degradation of polystyrene (PS) nanocomposites loaded with sol gel-synthesized ZnO nanorods. Polymers2020; 12(9): 1935. DOI: 10.3390/polym12091935.
22.
TohareNTLToncharNDSAdeNSS. Biodegradable packaging in medical field. Inter J Adv Res Sci Commun Tec2024; 4: 58–68. DOI: 10.48175/ijarsct-22706.
23.
Hashemi SanatgarRCampagneCNierstraszV. Investigation of the adhesion properties of direct 3D printing of polymers and nanocomposites on textiles: effect of FDM printing process parameters. Appl Surf Sci2017; 403: 551–563. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.112.
MoskalyukOABelashovAVBeltukovYM, et al.Polystyrene-based Nanocomposites with different fillers: fabrication and mechanical properties. Polymers2020; 12(11): 2457. DOI: 10.3390/polym12112457.
26.
LiHRenY. Application of polystyrene in building materials based on chemical hydration reaction. Chem Engi Tran2018; 66: 67–72. DOI: 10.3303/CET1866012.
27.
ZhangSYuZLiP, et al.Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate films with low conductivity and low acidity through a treatment of their solutions with probe ultrasonication and their application as hole transport layer in polymer solar cells and perovskite solar cells. Org Electron2016; 32: 149–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.02.024.
ChowdhuryMISAutulYSRahmanS, et al.Polymer nanocomposites for automotive applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier eBooks, 2022, pp. 267–317. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-824492-0.00010-6.
30.
De Souza NetoFNFerreiraGRSequinelT, et al.Polymeric nanocomposites for automotive application. Amsterdam: Elsevier eBooks, 2023, pp. 473–506. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-91611-0.00009-8.
31.
TkachenkoTYevdokymenkoVKamenskyhD, et al.Physico-chemical properties of biogenic SiO2 nanoparticles obtained from agriculture residue. Appl Nanosci2020; 10(12): 4617–4623. DOI: 10.1007/s13204-020-01383-1.
32.
ShirinovaHASurkhayliAPashayevB, et al. Preparation, characterization and thermal properties of the PS+Si based polymer nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2024; 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/08927057241288195.
33.
ShirinovaHASurkhayliAEPashayevBG. Fabrication, characterization and thermal properties of PVC+Si based polymer nanocomposites. Compos Interfaces. 2025; 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/09276440.2025.2467563.
34.
AokiNOmachiAUosakiK, et al.Structural study of electrochemically lithiated si(111) by using soft x-ray emission spectroscopy combined with scanning electron microscopy and through x-ray diffraction measurements. Chemelectrochem2016; 3(6): 959–965. DOI: 10.1002/celc.201600030.
35.
GaoYPicotOTTuW, et al.Multilayer coextrusion of graphene polymer nanocomposites with enhanced structural organization and properties. J Appl Polym Sci2017; 135(13): 46041. DOI: 10.1002/app.46041.
36.
ChristieJK. Review: understanding the properties of amorphous materials with high-performance computing methods. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci2023; 381(2250): 20220251. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0251.
37.
Jabbari-FaroujiSRottlerJLameO, et al.Correlation of structure and mechanical response in solid-like polymers. J Phys Condens Matter2015; 27(19): 194131. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/19/194131.
38.
MeyerHMüller-PlatheF. Formation of chain-folded structures in supercooled polymer melts examined by MD simulations. Macromolecules2002; 35(4): 1241–1252. DOI: 10.1021/ma011309l.
39.
LiuXLuanHJinglinY, et al.A method for characterizing short-range molecular order in amorphous starch. Carbohydr Polym2020; 242: 116405. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116405.
40.
KurienRASelvarajDPSekarM, et al.A comprehensive review on the mechanical, physical, and thermal properties of abaca fibre for their introduction into structural polymer composites. Cellulose2023; 30(14): 8643–8664. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05441-z.
41.
LynwoodC. Polystyrene: synthesis, characteristics, and applications. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers, 2014.
42.
WongCPJChoiP. On the diffusivity of ring polymers. Soft Matter2020; 16(9): 2350–2362. DOI: 10.1039/c9sm02275a.
43.
Goodarzi-HosseinabadiH. Unoccupied space and short-range order characterization in polymers under heat treatment. arXiv (Cornell University)2024. DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2401.06776.
44.
RouabahFDadacheDHaddaouiN. Thermophysical and mechanical properties of polystyrene: influence of free quenching. ISRN Polymer Science2012; 2012: 1–8. DOI: 10.5402/2012/161364.
45.
RahmanMRHamdanSChang HuiJL. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of wood polymer nanocomposites. MATEC Web Conf2017; 87: 03013. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20178703013.
46.
MomanyiJHerzogMMuchiriP. Analysis of thermomechanical properties of selected class of recycled thermoplastic materials based on their applications. Recycling2019; 4(3): 33. DOI: 10.3390/recycling4030033.
47.
WangZPangHLiG, et al.Glass transition and free volume of high impact Polystyrene/TiO2 nanocomposites determined by dilatometry. J Macromol Sci Part B2006; 45(5): 689–697. DOI: 10.1080/00222340600890497.
48.
MaromG. Why do nanoparticles (CNTs) reduce the glass transition temperature of nanocomposites?J Compos Sci2023; 7(3): 114. DOI: 10.3390/jcs7030114.
49.
WhiteRPLipsonJEG. Polymer free volume and its connection to the glass transition. Macromolecules2016; 49(11): 3987–4007. DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00215.
50.
ZhangXCresswellM. Materials Fundamentals of drug controlled release. Amsterdam: Elsevier eBooks, 2015, pp. 17–55. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-099991-3.00002-8.
51.
LiBZhangSAndreJS, et al.Relaxation behavior of polymer thin films: effects of free surface, buried interface, and geometrical confinement. Prog Polym Sci2021; 120: 101431. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101431.
52.
MenczelJDAndreRKohlWS, et al.Fundamentals of DSC. Amsterdam: Elsevier eBooks, 2023, pp. 1–189. DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811347-9.00005-9.
