Property evaluation of mechanically modified thermoset rigid polyurethane foam waste/NBR blends: Effect of blend ratios

Abstract

Burning of rigid polyurethane (PU) foam waste unlike that of natural rubber based product waste as an energy source is generally not performed as it may release toxic gases to the environment, which may lead to the human health issues. Therefore, these wastes are being accumulated in the environment without a proper disposal method. The main aim of this study was to develop a low-cost modification process for rigid thermoset PU foam waste to produce blends with nitrile rubber (NBR) for special applications. In addition to potentially enhancing the qualities and lifespan of the final goods, combining modified PU waste with NBR can help promote environmental sustainability through waste reduction, resource conservation, and energy efficiency. Thermoset rigid PU foam waste was mechanically modified using two roll mill by varying the number of mill passes from 6 to 18 at an interval of 3 mill passes. After evaluation of the properties of the modified PU waste, optimum mill pass was determined. A series of virgin NBR/mechanically modified rigid PU foam waste composites were prepared by varying the percentage of PU foam waste modified using two roll mill from 0 to 30% at 7.5% intervals according to an oil seal formulation. Cure characteristics, physico-mechanical properties such as tensile properties, tear strength, hardness, resilience, abrasion resistance, ageing performance as well as swelling behaviour, crosslink density and oil absorbance of NBR/mechanically modified PU foam waste vulcanizates in toluene and industrial oils were evaluated and compared with those of control vulcanizate. Results indicated that replacement of 30% virgin NBR with mechanically modified rigid thermoset PU foam waste retained 54%, 70% and 83% of tensile strength, elongation at break and tear strength, respectively. Hardness and resilience increased by less than 3%, whereas abrasion volume loss and compression set increased by 44% and 62%, respectively. Modulus at 100% elongation was dropped by 35%. Replacement of virgin NBR with mechanically modified PU up to 15% does not have any marked influence on physico-mechanical properties. Hence, the 85:15 virgin NBR/Modified PU blend compound could be suitable for oil resistant applications.

Keywords

Mechanical modification of rigid polyurethane foam acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber blends of NBR and polyurethane physico-mechanical properties oil resistant applications recycling of thermoset polyurethane

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Simon

Borreguero

De Lucas

, et al. Sustainable polyurethanes: chemical recycling to get it. Environment, Energy and Climate Change I: Environmental Chemistry of Pollutants and Wastes. 2015; 32: 229–260.

Kemona

Piotrowska

. Polyurethane recycling and disposal: methods and prospects. Polymers 2020; 12(8): 1752.

Yang

Dong

Liu

, et al. Recycling and disposal methods for polyurethane foam wastes. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2012; 16: 167–175.

Datta

Kopczyńska

Simón

, et al. Thermo-chemical decomposition study of polyurethane elastomer through glycerolysis route with using crude and refined glycerine as a transesterification agent. J Polym Environ 2018; 26: 166–174.

Paabo

Levin

. A review of the literature on the gaseous products and toxicity generated from the pyrolysis and combustion of rigid polyurethane foams. Fire Mater 1987; 11(1): 1–29.

Nikje

Garmarudi

Idris

. Polyurethane waste reduction and recycling: from bench to pilot scales. Des Monomers Polym 2011; 14(5): 395–421.

Karger-Kocsis

Gremmels

Mousa

, et al. Application of hygrothermally decomposed polyurethane in rubber recipes: Part 1: natural rubber (NR) and nitrile rubber (NBR) stocks. Kautschuk und Gummi Kunststoffe 2000; 53(9): 528–533.

Gonella

Zattera

Zeni

, et al. New reclaiming process of thermoset polyurethane foam and blending with polyamide-12 and thermoplastic polyurethane. J Elastomers Plast 2009; 41(4): 303–322.

Becker

Roeder

Oliveira

, et al. Blend of thermosetting polyurethane waste with polypropylene: influence of compatibilizing agent on interface domains and mechanical properties. Polym Test 2003; 22(2): 225–230.

10.

Sreeja

Kutty

. Studies on acrylonitrile butadiene rubber/reclaimed rubber blends. J Elastomers Plast 2002; 34(2): 145–155.

11.

Flory

Rehner

Jr Rehner

. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. Swelling. J Chem Phys 1943; 11: 521–526.

12.

Hayeemasae

Waesateh

Soontaranon

, et al. The effect of mastication time on the physical properties and structure of natural rubber. J Elastomers Plast 2021; 53(3): 228–240.

13.

Carlsson

Wiles

. Rubb Chem Technol 1974; 47: 676–990.

14.

Shelton

. Review of basic oxidation processes in elastomers. Rubb Chem Techno 1972; 45(2): 359–369.

15.

Ashida

. Polyurethane and related foams: chemistry and technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2006.

16.

Clarke

Freakley

, et al. Compatibilising effect of carbon black on morphology of NR–NBR blends. Plast, Rubber Compos 2001; 30(1): 39–44.

17.

Ismail

Freakley

Sutherland

, et al. Effects of multifunctional additive on mechanical properties of silica filled natural rubber compound. Eur Polym J 1995; 31(11): 1109–1117.

18.

Premachandra

Edirisinghe

De Silva

. A novel reclaiming agent for ground rubber tyre (GRT). Part 1: property evaluation of virgin natural rubber (NR)/novel reclaimed GRT blend compounds. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol 2011; 27(1): 31–48.

19.

Perera

KIDP

. Mechano-chemical reclamation of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber latex waste using an amino compound for oil resistant applications. MSc thesis. Sri Lanka: University of Sri Jayavardanepura, 2017.

20.

Vayyaprontavida Kaliyathan

Varghese

Nair

, et al. Rubber–rubber blends: a critical review. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol 2020; 36(3): 196–242.

21.

Mondal

Khastgir

. Effect of network formation on the electrical, mechanical, and processability behaviors through the preferential distribution of carbon black in the incompatible polymer blend composite. Polym Compos 2018; 39(8): 2620–2633.

22.

Edirisinghe

. Chemical modification of rubber waste and characterization of their blends with natural rubber. PhD Thesis. Moratuwa, Sri Lanka: University of Moratuwa, 2012.

23.

Nelson

Kutty

. Effect of silane coupling agent on cure characteristics and mechanical properties of chloroprene rubber/reclaimed rubber blend. Polym-Plast Technol Eng 2004; 43(4): 1141–1156.

24.

Qiu

Zhang

Wang

. Carbon black–filled styrene butadiene rubber masterbatch based on simple mixing of latex and carbon black suspension: preparation and mechanical properties. J Macromol Sci, Part B 2015; 54(12): 1541–1553.

25.

Kim

Nam

, et al. Oil resistance and low‐temperature characteristics of plasticized nitrile butadiene rubber compounds. J Appl Polym Sci 2019; 136(32): 47851.

26.

Abdel-Hakim

El-Mogy

Abou-Kandil

. Novel modification of styrene butadiene rubber/acrylic rubber blends to improve mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and swelling behavior for oil sealing applications. Polym Polym Compos 2021; 29(9_suppl): S959–S968.

27.

Baboo

Gupta

Sharma

, et al. Dynamic mechanical, mechanical and thermal analysis of CPI/NBR blends: effect of blend composition and crosslink density. Polym Bull 2016; 73: 2003–2018.

28.

Desai

Thakore

Brennan

, et al. Polyurethane-nitrile rubber blends. J Macromol Sci Part A 2001; 38(7): 711–729.

29.

Noriman

Ismail

Rashid

. Characterization of styrene butadiene rubber/recycled acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (SBR/NBRr) blends: the effects of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR-50) as a compatibilizer. Polym Test 2010; 29(2): 200–208.

30.

Moreira

Soares

. Study of utilization of ground EVA waste as filler in NBR vulcanizates. Polym Polym Compos 2002; 10(5): 381–390.

31.

Darestani Farahani

Bakhshandeh

Abtahi

. Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of natural rubber/reclaimed rubber blends. Polym Bull 2006; 56: 495–505.