Evaluating the thermal,mechanical and swelling behavior of novel silicone and polyurethane additively manufactured O-rings in the presence of organic liquids and military fuels

Abstract

This work investigates the physical properties and swelling behavior of additively manufactured (AM) and traditionally manufactured (TM) polyurethane (PU) and silicone O-rings when exposed to organic liquids and military fuels. Polymer properties were explored using differential scanning calorimetry, thermal gravimetric analysis, and tensile testing, and two AM print orientations (vertical and horizontal) were investigated. The AM polyurethane vertical and horizontal O-rings formed from a selective laser sintering (SLS) process had similar thermal features to each other and differed slightly from the un-sintered polymer in the temperature at which the greatest rate of mass loss occurred in the TGA analysis. The thermal features of the AM silicone O-rings formed using stereolithography (SLA) were more similar to those of a commercial soft silicone than to those of a commercial high purity silicone. The horizontal print orientation for each polymer had a higher tensile strength than its respective vertically oriented print. A 1-week exposure of the AM O-rings to the various organic liquids reduced the tensile strength of AM O-rings by as much as 80% (tensile strength exposed/tensile strength unexposed = 0.2). Polyurethane AM O-rings swelled from 3 to 74% with the greatest swelling occurring from exposure to acetone. Silicone AM O-rings swelled from 13 to 258% with the greatest swelling occurring from exposure to iso-octane. In general, the commercial O-rings swelled less than their AM counterparts, had higher tensile strengths, and had smoother surfaces. The maximum swelling for the PU O-rings occurred at an overall Hansen solubility parameter (HSP) between 18 and 20 MPa^1/2, while the maximum for silicone occurred at an HSP of 14.3 MPa^1/2. These values are consistent with literature values, which can vary widely.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Additive manufacturing 3D printing O-rings polymer swelling tensile strength

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rousaili

Nor Amirah

Mohd

, et al. Determination of structural and dimensional changes of O-ring polymer/rubber seals immersed in oils. Int J Civ Environ Eng 2010; 10: 1–15.

Romanczyk

Ramirez Velasco

, et al. The capability of organic compounds to swell acrylonitrile butadiene O-rings and their effects on O-ring mechanical properties. Fuel 2019; 238: 483–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.103.

Bagheri

Jin

. Photopolymerization in 3D printing. ACS Appl Polym Mater 2019; 1: 593–611. DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00165.

Luning Prak

Fohner

Neubauer

, et al. The impact of navy jet fuel (JP-5) and diesel fuel (F-76) on the swelling and tensile strength of additively-manufactured and commercially-manufactured O-rings. Fuel 2023; 354: 129291.

Adams

Baker

VanBriesen

, et al. Additively manufactured O-rings: tensile strength and swelling behavior in the presence of gasoline and surrogate mixtures. J Mater Eng Perform 2023; 32: 803–815. DOI: 10.1007/s11665-022-07124-5.

Luning Prak

Adams

VanBriesen

, et al. Swelling behavior and tensile strength of additively manufactured and commercial O-ring in the presence of linear, branched, cyclic, and aromatic compounds and alcohols. J Elastomers Plast 2022; 54: 937–958. DOI: 10.1177/00952443221104105.

Caulfield

McHugh

Lohfeld

. Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process. J Mater Process Technol 2007; 182: 477–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.09.007.

Han

Kong

. Topical review: advances in selective laser sintering of polymers. Int J Extrem Manuf 042002 2022; 4: 37. DOI: 10.1088/2631-7990/ac9096.

Pereira

Kennedy

Potgieter

. A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf 2019; 30: 11–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003.

10.

Flodberg

Pettersson

Yang

. Pore analysis and mechanical performance of selective laser sintered objects. Addit Manuf 2018; 24: 307–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.001.

11.

Hansen

Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press, 2007.

12.

Kass

Theiss

Pawel

, et al. Compatibility assessment of elastomer materials to test fuels representing gasoline blends containing ethanol and isobutanol. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 2014; 7: 445–456.

13.

Kass

Janke

Connatser

, et al. Compatibility of biologically derivable alcohols, alkanes, esters, ketones, and an ether as diesel blendstocks with fuel system elastomers. Energy Fuels 2021; 35: 4979–4996. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04357.

14.

Kass

Janke

Connatser

, et al. Compatibility assessment of fuel system elastomers with bio-oil and diesel fuel. Energy Fuels 2016; 30: 6486–6494. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01138.

15.

Zhang

Zhao

, et al. Loading dependent swelling and release properties of novel biodegradable, elastic and environmental stimuli-sensitive polyurethanes. J Contr Release 2008; 131: 128–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.026.

16.

Zhang

Chen

Zhang

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of polyurethane elastomers. J Elastomers Plast 2008; 40: 161–177. DOI: 10.1177/0095244307085540.

17.

Kumar

Srivastava

Mathur

. Evaluation of swelling studies and thermal characteristics of Castor oil based polyurethane elastomeric networks. J Elastomers Plast 1985; 17: 89–96. DOI: 10.1177/009524438501700109.

18.

Komariah

Arita

Aprianjaya

, et al. O-rings material deterioration due to contact with biodiesel blends in a dynamic fuel flow. J Phys: Conf Ser 2019; 1167: 012050. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012050.

19.

Formlabs . SILICONE RESIN. Silicone 40A. Somerville, MA: Formlabs. https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/2301817-TDS-ENUS-0.pdf (accessed 112723 2023).

20.

Formlabs . SLS POWDERS, TPU 90A powder. Somerville, MA: Formlabs. https://formlabs-media.formlabs.com/datasheets/2301750-TPU-TDS-ENUS-0.pdf

21.

Mieczkowski

. Solubility parameter components of some polyurethanes. Eur Polym J 1992; 28: 53–55. DOI: 10.1016/0014-3057(92)90237-V.

22.

Zhang

Kessler

. Bio-based polyurethane foam made from compatible blends of vegetable-oil-based polyol and petroleum-based polyol. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2015; 3: 743–749. DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00049.

23.

Corporan

Edwards

Shafer

, et al. Chemical, thermal stability, seal swell, and emissions studies of alternative jet fuels. Energy Fuels 2011; 25: 955–966. DOI: 10.1021/ef101520v.

24.

Turn

. Effects of aromatic fluids on properties and stability of alternative marine diesels. Fuel 2018; 216: 171–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.019.

25.

Graham

Rahmes

Kay

, et al. Final report for alternative fuels task: impact of SPK fuels and fuel blends on non-metallic materials used in commercial aircraft fuel systems, report DOT/FAA/AEE/2014-10. Dayton: Boeing Company and University of Dayton Research Institute, 2013.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB