Graft polymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (PEGA) onto polyurethane (PU) was conducted to improve its water compatibility, tensile mechanical strength, shape memory, and low-temperature flexibility properties, as well as to control its water vapor permeability (WVP). Control PUs containing free poly(PEGA) were also prepared to compare with the poly(PEGA)-grafted PUs. The water compatibility of PU notably improved due to the grafting of poly(PEGA) based on water contact angle results. The soft segment melting temperature and glass transition temperature were not changed with the increase in the PEGA content. The tensile strength of PU sharply increased due to the grafting of poly(PEGA), whereas the free poly(PEGA) in the control PUs did not cause a similar increase. The maximum strain of PU was not affected by the grafting of poly(PEGA). The shape recovery at 0°C significantly increased compared with the unmodified PU. The low-temperature flexibility of PU improved, and the WVP through the PU membrane was reduced by the grafting of poly(PEGA) onto PU.
ChoiHSKimYSZhangY, et al.Plasma-induced graft co-polymerization of acrylic acid onto the polyurethane surface. Surf Coat Tech2004; 182: 55–64.
2.
ChambersLDStokesKRWalshFC, et al.Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings. Surf Coat Tech2006; 201: 3642–3652.
3.
LvQCaoCZhuH. Blood compatibility of polyurethane immobilized with acrylic acid and plasma grafting sulfonic acid. J Mater Sci Mater Med2004; 15: 607–611.
4.
OzdemirMYurteriCUSadikogluH. Physical polymer surface modification methods and applications in food packaging polymers. Crit Rev Food Sci1999; 39: 457–477.
5.
HuangCYLuWLFengYC. Effect of plasma treatment on the AAc grafting percentage of high-density polyethylene. Surf Coat Tech2003; 167: 1–10.
6.
KimSR. Surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) film by chemical etching, plasma, and ion beam treatments. J Appl Polym Sci2000; 77: 1913–1920.
7.
KohSKParkSCKimSR, et al.Surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene by Ar+ irradiation for improved adhesion to other materials. J Appl Polym Sci1997; 64: 1913–1921.
8.
AlvesPCoelhoJFJHaackJ, et al.Surface modification and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane. Eur Polym J2009; 45: 1412–1419.
9.
ZaniniSOrlandiMColomboC, et al.Plasma-induced graft-polymerization of polyethylene glycol acrylate on polypropylene substrates. Eur Phys J D2009; 54: 159–164.
10.
SunFLiXXuJ, et al.Improving hydrophilicity and protein antifouling of electrospun poly(vinylidenefluoride-hexafluoropropylene) nanofiber membranes. Chin J Polym Sci2010; 28: 705–713.
11.
ShihengYLiRYingjunW. Argon plasma-induced graft polymerization of PEGMA on chitosan membrane surface for cell adhesion improvement. Plasma Sci Technol2013; 15: 1041–1046.
12.
TuCYLiuYLLeeKR, et al.Surface grafting polymerization and modification on poly(tetrafluoroethylene) films by means of ozone treatment. Polymer2005; 46: 6976–6985.
13.
SeymourRBKauffmanGB. Polyurethanes: a class of modern versatile materials. J Chem Ed1992; 69: 909–910.
14.
EngelsHWPirklHGAlbersR, et al.Polyurethanes: versatile materials and sustainable problem solvers for today’s challenges. Angew Chem Int Ed2013; 52: 9422–9441.
15.
Freij-LarssonCWesslenB. Grafting of polyurethane surfaces with poly(ethylene glycol). J Appl Polym Sci1993; 50: 345–352.
16.
ArchambaultJGJohnL. Protein resistant polyurethane surfaces by chemical grafting of PEO: amino-terminated PEO as grafting reagent. Colloid Surface B2004; 39: 9–16.
17.
TanKObendorfSK. Surface modification of microporous polyurethane membrane with poly(ethylene glycol) to develop a novel membrane. J Mem Sci2006; 274: 150–158.
18.
HuangJXuW. Zwitterionic monomer graft copolymerization onto polyurethane surface through a PEG spacer. Appl Surf Sci2010; 256: 3921–3927.
19.
ChungYCKimHYYuJH, et al.Impact of cholesterol grafting on molecular interactions and low temperature flexibility of polyurethanes. Macromol Res2015; 23: 350–359.
20.
ChungYCJungIHChoiJW, et al.Characterization and proof testing of the halochromic shape memory polyurethane. Polym Bull2014; 71: 1153–1171.
21.
ChungYCKimHYChoiJW, et al.Preparation of water-compatible antifungal polyurethane with grafted benzimidazole as the antifungal agent. J Appl Polym Sci2015; 132: 41676–41684.
22.
ChungYCKhiemNDChunBC. Characterization of a polyurethane copolymer covalently linked to graphite and the influence of graphite on electric conductivity. J Compos Mater2015; 49: 1689–1703.
23.
ChoJWJungYCChunBC, et al.Water vapor permeability and mechanical properties of fabrics coated with shape-memory polyurethane. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 2: 2812–2816.
24.
KemperSLFennemaO. Water vapor permeability of edible bilayer films. J Food Sci1984; 49: 1478–1481.
25.
JeongHMAhnBKChoSM, et al.Water vapor permeability of shape memory polyurethane with amorphous reversible phase. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys2000; 38: 3009–3017.
26.
Seyed MohagheghSMBarikaniMEntezamiAA. The effect of grafted poly(ethylene glycol monomethyl ether) on particle size and viscosity of aqueous polyurethane dispersions. Colloid Surface A2006; 276: 95–99.
27.
SuZLiQLiuY, et al.Compatibility and phase structure of binary blends of poly(lactic acid) and glycidyl methacrylate grafted poly(ethylene octane). Eur Polym J2009; 45: 2428–2433.
28.
ChoiTWekslerJPadsalgikarA, et al.Microstructural organization of polydimethylsiloxane soft segment polyurethanes derived from a single macrodiol. Polymer2010; 51: 4375–4382.
29.
RussoPLavorgnaMPiscitelliF, et al.Thermoplastic polyurethane films reinforced with carbon nanotubes: the effect of processing on the structure and mechanical properties. Eur Polym J2013; 49: 379–388.
30.
ChungYCKhiemNDChunBC. Effects of the structures of end groups of pendant polydimethylsiloxane attached to a polyurethane copolymer on the low temperature toughness. Polym Eng Sci2015; 55: 1931–1940.
