Mechanical properties and morphology of the deproteinized natural rubber (NR) films reinforced with modified silica (SiO2) nanoparticles were studied in this research. In the step of deproteinization, a chemical method followed by centrifugation was used to reduce the amount of protein from 0.42 wt% to 0.11 wt%. Structure-modified nanosilica with Silane A174 was used as an additive to reinforce the deproteinized films. The addition of 1 phr of the modified nanosilica exhibited better tensile strength, tensile force at break, modulus at 500% and elongation at break which were improved significantly compared to those of bare films. The modified nanosilica dispersed uniformly in the rubber matrix with the nanoparticle size less than 100 nm observed from the scanning electron microscope. The prepared rubber films containing the modified SiO2 nanoparticles have great potential to produce the NR gloves having very tiny amounts of protein for medical use which still provide the good mechanical strength compared to the standard ones.
WeiYZhangHWuL, et al.A review on characterization of molecular structure of natural rubber. MOJ Poly Sci2017; 1: 197–199.
2.
SingAPWiSGChungGC, et al.The micromorphology and protein characterization of rubber particles in Ficus carica, Ficus benghalensis and Hevea brasiliensis. J Exp Bot2003; 54: 985–992.
3.
TanakaY. Structural characterization of natural polyisoprenes: solve the mystery of natural rubber based on structural study. Rubber Chem Technol2001; 74: 355–375.
4.
TanakaY. Structure and biosynthesis mechanism of natural polyisoprene. Prog Polym Sci1989; 14: 339–371.
5.
MekkriengkraiDSakdapipanichJTTanakaY. Characterization of terminal groups in natural rubber: origin of nitrogenous groups. Rubber Chem Technol2006; 79: 366–379.
6.
TarachiwinLSakdapipanichJUteK, et al.Structural characterization of α-terminal group of natural rubber. 2. Decomposition of branch-points by phospholipase and chemical treatments. Biomacromolecules2005; 6: 1858–1863.
7.
AllenPWBristowGM. The gel phase in natural rubber. Rubber Chem Technol2001; 36: 1024–1034.
8.
YeangHYArifSAMYusofF, et al.Allergenic proteins of natural rubber latex. Methods2002; 27: 32–45.
9.
GaspariAAThatcherTBurnsRP, et al.Bacterial protease treatment of natural rubber latex alters its primary immunogenicity in a mouse model of sensitization. Clin Immunol2002; 105: 9–16.
10.
TurjanmaaK. Allergy to natural rubber latex: a growing problem. Ann Med2010; 26: 297–300.
11.
HainMALongmanLPFieldEA, et al.Natural rubber latex allergy: implications for the orthodontist. J Orthod2007; 34: 6–11.
12.
LevyDACharpinDPecquetC, et al.Allergy to latex. Allergy1992; 47: 579–587.
13.
JunoiSChistiYHansupalakN. Optimal conditions for deproteinizing natural rubber using immobilized alkaline protease. J Chem Technol Biotechnol2015; 90: 185–193.
14.
SakdapipanichJT. Structural characterization of natural rubber based on recent evidence from selective enzymatic treatments. J Biosci Bioeng2007; 103: 287–292.
15.
PerrellaFWGaspariAA. Natural rubber latex protein reduction with an emphasis on enzyme treatment. Methods2002; 27: 77–86.
16.
PichayakornWSuksaereeJBoonmeP, et al.Preparation of deproteinized natural rubber latex and properties of films formed by itself and several adhesive polymer blends. Ind Eng Chem Res2012; 51: 13393–13404.
17.
KawaharaSTakanoKYunyongwattanakornJ, et al.Crystal nucleation and growth of natural rubber purified by deproteinization and trans-esterification. Polym J2004; 36: 361–367.
18.
GuidonPTJrPerrinDHarrisonP. Peptide bond cleavage site determination of novel proteolytic enzymes found in ROS 17/2.8 cell lysates. J Cell Physiol1996; 166: 407–412.
19.
PrasertkittikulSChistiYHansupalakN. Deproteinization of natural rubber using protease immobilized on epichlorohydrin cross-linked chitosan beads. Ind Eng Chem Res2013; 52: 11723–11731.
20.
YamamotoYNghiaPTKlinklaiW, et al.Removal of proteins from natural rubber with urea and its application to continuous processes. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 107: 2329–2332.
21.
KlinklaiWSaitoTKawaharaS, et al.Hyperdeproteinized natural rubber prepared with urea. J Appl Polym Sci2004; 93: 555–559.
22.
KawaharaSKlinklaiWKurodaH, et al.Removal of proteins from natural rubber with urea. Polym Adv Technol2004; 15: 181–184.
23.
BennionBJDaggettV. The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2003; 100: 5142–5147.
24.
NawamawatKSakdapipanichJTHoCC. Effect of deproteinized methods on the proteins and properties of natural rubber latex during storage. Macromol Symp2010; 288: 95–103.
25.
AbhilashGSabharwalSDubeyA, et al.Preparation of low-protein natural rubber latex: effect of polyethylene glycol. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 114: 806–810.
26.
AmnuaypornsriSSakdapipanichJTanakaY. Highly purified natural rubber by saponification of latex: analysis of green and cured properties. J Appl Polym Sci2010; 118: 3524–3531.
27.
BodeHBKerkhoffKJendrossekD. Bacterial degradation of natural and synthetic rubber. Biomacromolecules2001; 2: 295–303.
28.
SchwerinMWalshDRichardsonD, et al.Biaxial flex-fatigue and viral penetration of natural rubber latex gloves before and after artificial aging. J Biomed Mater Res2002; 63: 739–745.
29.
WalshDLSchwerinMRKisielewskiRW, et al.Abrasion resistance of medical glove materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater2004; 68: 81–87.
BusfieldJJCDeeprasertkulCThomasAG. The effects of liquids on the dynamic properties of carbon black filled natural rubber as a function of pre-strain. Polymer2000; 41: 9219–9225.
32.
CaiHHLiSDRianTG, et al.Reinforcement of natural rubber latex film by ultrafine calcium carbonate. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 87: 982–985.
33.
ArroyoMLopez-ManchadoMAHerreroB. Organo-montmorillonite as substitute of carbon black in natural rubber compounds. Polymer2003; 44: 2447–2453.
34.
KongLXPengZLiSD, et al.Nanotechnology and its role in the management of periodontal diseases. Periodnotology2006; 40: 184–196.
35.
PengZKongLXLiSD, et al.Self-assembled natural rubber/silica nanocomposites: its preparation and characterization. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 3130–3139.
36.
MoolsinSDechruksaN. Deproteinized natural rubber prepared with urea and sodium hydroxide. In: PACCON conference 2016 (polymer chemistry), Bangkok, Thailand, 9–11February2016, pp. 1165–1170. Bangkok: PACCON.
37.
PromdsornSChaiyasatPChaiyasatA. Heterocoaggulation of natural rubber latex and poly[styrene-co-2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl trimethylammonium chloride] nanoparticles. Adv Mat Res2012; 506: 299–302.
38.
ChuayjuljitSBoonmahitthisudA. Natural rubber nanocomposites using polystyrene-encapsulated nanosilica prepared by differential microemulsion polymerization. Appl Surf Sci2010; 256: 7211–7216.
39.
YuJYuJGaoYF, et al.Grafting of polystyrene onto a nanometer silica surface by microemulsion polymerization. Chin J Polym Sci2001; 20:71–76.
40.
KimSHAhuSHHiraiT. Crystallization kinetics and nucleation activity of silica nanoparticle-filled poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate). Polymer2003; 44: 5625–5634.
