BarkinDavid2018De la Protesta a la Propuesta: 50 Años Imaginando y Construyendo el Futuro. Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores and Universidad Autónomo Metropolitana.
2.
CelisLeila2017 “Economic extractivism and agrarian social movements: Perspectives on low-density democracy in the face of the Colombian conflict.” Latin American Perspectives. 44 (5): 145–161.
3.
DoughertyMichael L.2019 “How does development mean: Attitudes towar mining and he social meaning of development in Guatemala.” Latin American Perspectives. 46 (2): 161–181.
4.
EllnerSteve. 2021 “Introduction: Rethinking Latin American extractivism,” pp. 1–28 in EllnerSteve, (ed.), Latin American Extractivism: Dependency, Resource Nationalism, and Resistance in Broad Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
FarthingLauraFabricantNicole2018 “Open Veins revisited: Charting the social, economic, and political contours of the new extractivism in Latin America.” Latin American Perspectives. 45 (5): 4–17.
6.
HicksKathrynFabricantNicole2016 “The Bolivian climate justice movement: Mobilizing indigeneity in climate change negotiation.” Latin American Perspectives43 (4): 87–104.
7.
NarchiNemer E.2015 “Introduction. Environmental violence in Mexico: A conceptual introduction.” Latin American Perspectives. 42 (5): 5–18.
8.
Santelices SpikinAndreaRojas HernándezJorge2016 “Introduction. Climate change in Lattin America: Inequality, conflict, and social movements of adaptation.” Latin American Perspectives. 43 (4): 4–11.
9.
TetreaultDarcy2015 “Social environmental mining conflicts in Mexico.” Latin American Perspectives. 42 (5): 48–66.
10.
VallejoIvetteCieloCristinaGarcíaFernando2019 “The gendered dimensions of resource extractivism in Argentina.” Latin American Perspectives46 (2): 182–198.
11.
WilsonTamar Diana2020 “Climate change, neoliberalism, and migration: Mexican sons of peasants on the beach.” Latin American Perspectives. 47 (6): 20–35.
12.
WilsonTamar Diana2023 “Hegemony, quasi-counterhegemony and counterhegemony in pesticide use in Latin America with special reference to Mexico.” Review of Radical Political Economics55 (3): 378–389.
