Given the neoliberal agenda implemented by Paulo Guedes’s Ministry of the Economy, the Bolsonaro government’s nationalist stance has prompted academic debates over its rationales. Once the populist and conservative foundations of that nationalism are understood, however, there is no contradiction between it and Bolsonaro’s economic policy.
La agenda neoliberal implementada por el Ministerio de Economía de Paulo Guedes aparentemente cuestiona la postura nacionalista del gobierno de Bolsonaro y ha provocado debates académicos en torno a sus razones fundamentales. Sin embargo, una vez que se entienden las razones populistas y el conservatismo detrás de dicho nacionalismo, no hay contradicción entre estas y la política económica de Bolsonaro.
AkcayUmit2020 “Rising authoritarian (post-)neoliberalism in Turkey.” Paper presented at the symposium The Conservative Backlash: Brazil in Comparative Perspective, Freie Universitat Berlin, 2020.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoArdagnaSilvia2010 “Large changes in fiscal policy: taxes versus spending,” pp. 35–69 in BrownJeffreyJr. (ed.), Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 24. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AndersonBenedict2008Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
BarbosaNelson2019 “O problema das três regras fiscais.” Le Monde Diplomatique Brasil, May30.
8.
BernardesCristiane BrumBarrosCaio Carvalho Correia2019 “Populismo no Brasil contemporâneo: uma análise de discursos de Lula e Bolsonaro.” Paper presented at the VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política, Brasília.
9.
BluhmKatharinaVargaMihai2019 “Conservative developmental statism in East Central Europe and Russia.” New Political Economy25: 642–659.
CasarõesGuilherme2020 “The first year of Bolsonaro's foreign policy,” pp. 81–109 in MoriAntonella (ed.), Latin America and New Global Order: Danger and Opportunities in a Multipolar World. Milan: Ledizioni Ledi Publishing.
Couto e SilvaGolbery1981Conjuntura política nacional: O poder executivo & geopolítica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio.
18.
DardotPierreLavalChristian2017The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. New York: Verso Books
19.
DuménilGérardLévyDominique2005 “The neoliberal (counter)revolution,” pp. 9–19 in Saad FilhoAlfredoJohnstonDeborah (eds.), Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader. London: Pluto Press.
FreedenMichael2006Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33.
FreixoAdrianoPinheiro-MachadoRosana2019 “Dias de um futuro (quase) esquecido: um país em transe, a democracia em colapso,” pp. 9–24 in Pinheiro-MachadoRosaneFreixoAdriano de (eds.), Brasil em transe: Bolsonarismo, Nova Direita e desdemocratização. Rio de Janeiro: Oficina Raquel.
HamiltonAlexander1966 “Report on manufactures,” pp. 1–15 in SyrettHarold (ed.), The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, Vol. 10. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
HelleinerEric2002 “Economic nationalism as a challenge to economic liberalism? Lessons from the 19th century.” International Studies Quarterly46 (1): 307–329.
LevitskyStevenZiblattDaniel2018How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.
45.
ListFriedrich1904The National System of Political Economy. New York: Longmans.
46.
LynchChristian2021 “Nada de NOVO sob o Sol: teoria e prática do neoliberalismo brasileiro.” Insight Inteligência, no. 91, 17–34.
47.
MannheimKarl1981 “O pensamento conservador,” pp. 77–131 in MartinsJosé (ed.), Introdução à sociologia rural. São Paulo: Ática.
48.
MilanovicBranko2016Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49.
MuddeCasKaltwasserCristóval2017Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
PalleyThomas2018Re-theorizing the Welfare State and the Political Economy of Neoliberalism’s War Against It. FMM Working Paper 16.
51.
PaulaLuiz Fernando de2021 “The coronavirus crisis and countercyclical policies in Brazil.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention18 (21): 177–197.
52.
PaulaLuiz Fernando deOreiroJosé Luís2021Macroeconomia da estagnação brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: Alta Books.
53.
PaulaLuiz Fernando dePiresManoel2013 “The effects of fiscal policy after the global recession: assessing the evidences.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy33: 315–321.
54.
PaulaLuiz Fernando deSantosFabianoMoraRafael2020 “The developmentalist project of the PT governments: an economic and political assessment.” Latin American Perspectives47 (2): 8–24.
55.
RodrikDani2018 “Populism and the economics of globalization.” Journal of International Business Policy1: 12–33.
56.
RosanvallonPierre2002O liberalismo econômico: História da ideia de mercado. Florianópolis: EDUSC.
57.
Saad FilhoAlfredoJohnstonDeborah2005 “Introduction,” pp. 1–6 in Saad FilhoAlfredoJohnstonDeborah (eds.), Neoliberalism: A Critical Reader. London: Pluto Press.
58.
UrbinatiNadia2019 “Political theory of populism.” Annual Review of Political Science22: 111–127.
VincentAndrew2002Nationalism and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
62.
VincentAndrew2013 “Nationalism,” pp. 530–555 in FreedenMichaelStearsMarc (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
