Extensive socio-ethnographic fieldwork among nongovernmental organizations, international donor agencies, and Church-related organizations in Chiapas, Mexico, suggests that global civil society—as an imagined terrain of transnational social action—can be viewed both as a site of expanded possibilities for social action and as a source of significant new constraints. It is a terrain where not all ideas and values are heard, promoted, or given legitimacy. There is, however, a transnationally resonant language into which Southern activists need to translate their issues and concerns if they wish to be heard.
AmooreLouiseLangleyPaul2004 “Ambiguities of global civil society.” Review of International Studies30: 89–110.
2.
AndersonBenedict1983Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. New York and London: Verso.
3.
BakerGideon2002 “Problems in the theorization of global civil society.” Political Studies50: 928–943.
4.
BartelsonJens2006 “Making sense of global civil society.” European Journal of International Relations12: 371–395.
5.
BatliwalaSrilatha2002 “Grassroots movements as transnational actors: implications for global civil society.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organization13: 393–409.
6.
BenessaiehAfef2004 “¿Civilizando la sociedad civil? La cooperación internacional en Chiapas en los 90’s,” pp. 33–52 in MatoD. (ed.), Politicas de ciudadania y sociedad civil en tiempos de globalización. Caracas and Buenos Aires: UNESCO and Consejo Latino Americano de Ciencias Sociales.
7.
BobClifford2001 “Marketing rebellions: insurgent groups, international media, and NGOs support.” International Politics38(September): 311–334.
8.
BobClifford2002 “Merchants of morality.” Foreign Policy129(March-April): 36–45.
9.
BrayDavidPlazaJosé LuisContrerasEllen2002 “Social dimensions of organic coffee production in Mexico: lessons for eco-labelling initiatives.” Society and Natural Resources15: 429–446.
10.
BrecherJeremyCostelloTimSmithBrendan2000Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity. Cambridge: South End Press.
11.
BryskAllison2000From Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
CastellsManuel1996The Rise of The Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
ChandhokeNeera2005 “How global is global civil society?”Journal of World-Systems Research11: 355–371.
14.
Chiapas1989 “Situación de los refugiados guatemaltecos en Chiapas en 1987,” pp. 45–47 in Frontera Sur indicadores básicos 1988. Tuxtla Gutierrez: State Government/INEGI/CIESAS.
15.
Chiapas2002Desarrollo social en cifras. Tuxtla Gutierrez: State Secretariat of Social Development.
16.
ClarkAnne-MarieFriedmanElizabethHochstetlerKathryn1998 “The sovereign limits of global civil society: a comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women.” World Politics51(1): 1–35.
17.
CohenJeanAratoAndrew1992Sociedad civil y teoría política. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
18.
COLEM (Colectivo de Encuentro de Mujeres)1990–1991 “La violación.” Brochure San Cristóbal de Las Casas
19.
COLEM (Colectivo de Encuentro de Mujeres)1995 “Grupo de mujeres de San Cristóbal las Casas A.C.” Brochure, San Cristóbal de Las Casas.
20.
Conservation International–Mexico1998Síntesis de las actividades y logros de Conservación Internacional México, A.C. en la Selva Lacandona (1988–1998). Tuxtla Gutierrez.
21.
CoxRobert1999 “Civil society at the turn of the millennium: prospects for an alternative world order.” Review of International Studies25(3): 2–28.
22.
de VosJan2002Una tierra para sembrar el sueño: Historia reciente de la Selva Lacandona 1950–2000. Mexico City: CIESAS/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
EllisonKate2002 “Organic and Fair Trade coffee growers connect to global markets,” pp. 57–61 in Ford Foundation, Sustainable Solutions: Building Assets for Empowerment and Sustainable Development (A Program Learning Product of the Environment and Development Affinity Group). New York: Ford Foundation Asset Building and Community Development Program.
25.
EscobarArturo1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
FinnemoreMarthaSikkinkKathryn1999 “International norm dynamics and political change,” pp. 247–278 in KatzensteinPeterKeohaneRobertKrasnerStephen (eds.), Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
Ford Foundation1986Created Equal: A Report of the Ford Foundation Women’s Programs. New York.
29.
Ford Foundation19901990 Annual Report. New York.
30.
Ford Foundation1991aFord Foundation Annual Report 1991. New York.
31.
Ford Foundation1991bReproductive Health: A Strategy for the 1990s. New York.
32.
Ford Foundation2000Annual Report 2000. New York.
33.
Ford Foundation2002Sustainable Solutions Building Assets for Empowerment and Sustainable Development. A Program Learning Product of the Environment and Development Affinity Group. New York: Asset Building and Community Development Program.
34.
FowleyMichaelEdwardsBob1998 “Beyond Tocqueville: civil society and social capital in comparative perspective.” American Behavioral Scientist42(1): 5–18.
35.
García AguilarMarie-CarmenVillafuerte SolisDaniel2001 “Las organizaciones sociales en Chiapas hoy,” pp. 52–89 in CastilloJaimePatiñoElsaZermeñoSergio (eds.), Pobreza y organizaciones de la sociedad civil. Puebla: UAP/CONACYT/Red de Investigación Urbana A.C.
36.
González EspondaJuan2001 “Movimiento campesino: del Congreso Indígena a la Insurrección Zapatista,” pp. 139–154 in GallOlivia (ed.), Chiapas: Sociedad, economía, interculturalidad y política. Mexico City: UNAM.
37.
González FigueroaGerardo2002 “Formación y consolidación de la sociedad civil en Chiapas: ONGs, sociedad civil y movimientos populares en los Altos y la Selva de Chiapas 1968–2000.” Master’s thesis in Rural Development, UNAM-Xochimilco/CIESAS-Sureste.
38.
GuidryJohnKennedyMichaelZaldMayer (eds.) 2001Globalization and Social Movements: Culture, Power, and the Transnational Public Sphere. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39.
HardingSandra1998Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
40.
HarveyDavid2000Spaces of Hope. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41.
HeldDavid1995Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42.
HowellJudePearceJenny2001Civil Society and Development: A Critical Exploration. London: Lynne Rienner.
43.
HulmeDavidEdwardsMichael (eds.) 1997NGOs, States, and Donors: Too Close for Comfort?Houndmills: Macmillan Press/Save the Children.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19921992 in Review. Arlington, VA.
49.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19931993 en Resumen. Arlington, VA.
50.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19941994 en Resumen. Arlington, VA.
51.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19951995 en Resumen. Arlington, VA.
52.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19961996 en Resumen. Arlington, VA.
53.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19971997 en Resumen: Los cimientos de las alianzas. Arlington, VA.
54.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)19981998 en Resumen: La inversión en el desarrollo. Arlington, VA.
55.
IAF (Inter-American Foundation)2000Steps Towards Sustainability: Inter-American Foundation 1999 Review. Arlington, VA.
56.
KeaneJohn2003Global Civil Society?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
KeckMargaretSikkinkKathryn1998Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
58.
LipshutzRonnie1992 “Reconstructing world politics: the emergence of global civil society.” Millennium21: 389–421.
59.
MatoDaniel1997a “A research-based framework for analyzing processes of (re)construction of ‘civil societies’ in the age of globalization,” pp. 127–139 in ServaesJeanLieRico (eds.), Media and Politics in Transition: Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization. Brussels: ACCO Publishers.
60.
MatoDaniel1997b “Towards a microphysics of the transnational re (organization) of Latin American ‘civil societies’ in the age of globalization.” Organization4: 506–514.
61.
MatoDaniel2001 “Producción transnacional de representaciones sociales y transformaciones sociales en tiempos de globalización,” pp. 127–159 in Estudios latinoamericanos sobre cultura y transformaciones sociales en tiempos de globalización 1. Caracas: CLACSO/UNESCO.
62.
MawdsleyEmmaTownsendJanePorterGinaOakleyPeter2002Knowledge, Power, and Development Agendas: NGOs North and South. Oxford: International NGO Training and Research Center.
63.
MelesioJuan Carlos1989 “Refugiados y frontera,” pp. 421–441 in HernándezJesúsSandovalJuan Manuel (eds.), El redescubrimiento de la Frontera Sur. Mexico City: Metropolitan Autonomous University/Zacatecas Autonomous University.
64.
MeyerCarrie1999The Economics and Politics of NGOs in Latin America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
65.
MunckRonaldo2002 “Global civil society: myths and prospects.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations13: 349–361.
66.
NighRonald1997 “Organic agriculture and globalization: a Maya associative corporation in Chiapas, Mexico.” Human Organization56: 427–436.
67.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)1996 “OXFAM grants list 1995/1996,” pp. 167–168 in Annual Report 1996. Oxford.
68.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)1997La cooperación y las contrapartes de OXFAM UK/I en México, Buscando Alternativas Corresponsables Frente a la Desigualdad y la Pobreza. Managua: Regional Bureau for Central America and Mexico.
69.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)1998 “OXFAM grants list 1997/1998,” pp. 151–152 in Annual Report 1998. Oxford.
70.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)1999 (1993) “Appendix: Gender and development—Oxfam’s policy for its programme, agreed by Oxfam Council on 16th May 1993,” pp. 337–342 in PorteeFenellaSmithInesSweetmanCarla (eds.), Gender Works: Oxfam Experience in Policy and Practice. Oxford.
71.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)2000 “OXFAM grants list 1999/2000,” pp. 118–119 in Annual Report 2000. Oxford.
72.
Oxfam-UK/I (United Kingdom Ireland)2001 “OXFAM grants list 2000/2001,” pp. 158–159 in Annual Report 2001. Oxford.
73.
PinterFrances2000 “Funding global civil society organisations,” pp. 195–217 in AnheierHelmutGlasiusMarliesKaldorMary (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
RenardMarie-Christine1999Los intersticios de la globalización: Un label (Max Havelaar) para los pequeños productores de café. Mexico City: ISMAM/Chapingo University Rural Sociology Department/PIDRCAFE/CEMCA.
75.
RoyIndrajit2003 “Development and its discontents: civil society as the new lexicon.” Development46(1): 80–87.
76.
SalomonLesterAnheierHelmut1997 “Towards a common definition,” pp. 29–50 in Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
77.
SalomonLesterSokolowskiWojciechListRegina2003Global Civil Society: An Overview. Baltimore: John Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, Johns Hopkins University.
78.
SchifterMichael2000 “Latin American democratization: the civil society puzzle,” pp. 243–268 in OttawayMarinaCarothersTimothy (eds.), Funding Virtue: Civil Society Aid and Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace/Brookings Institution.
79.
SmithJackieChatfieldCharlesPagnuccoRon (eds.) 1997Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity beyond the State. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
80.
SmythInes1999 “A rose by any other name: Feminism in development NGOs,” pp. 132–141 in PorterFenellaSmythInesSweetmanCarla (eds.), Gender Works: Oxfam Experience in Policy and Practice. Oxford: Oxfam-GB Publishing.
81.
TicknerArlene2003 “Seeing IR differently: notes from the Third World.” Millennium32: 295–324.
82.
TownsendJanetPorterGinaMawdsleyEmma2003Spaces of Resistance: Women and Men Using NGOs in Ghana, India, and Mexico. Oxford: International Non-Governmental Training and Research Center.
83.
TvedtTerje1998Angels of Mercy or Development Diplomats? NGOs and Foreign Aid. Oxford: James Currey.
84.
TvedtTerje2002 “Development NGOs: actors in a global civil society or in a new international social system?”Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations13: 363–375.
85.
van RooyAlison (ed.) 1998Civil Society and the Aid Industry. London: EarthScan.
86.
VanderHoff BoersmaFrans2002Poverty Alleviation through Participation in Fair Trade Coffee Networks: The Case of UCIRI, Oaxaca, Mexico. Fort Collins, CO: Department of Sociology, State University of Colorado, Fair Trade Research Group. http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Sociology/FairTradeResearchGroup/doc/pov.pdf (accessed April 6, 2008).
87.
VogelAnn2006 “Who’s making global civil society? Philanthropy and US empire in world society.” British Journal of Sociology57: 635–655.
88.
WalzerMichael1997 “The idea of civil society.” Kettering Review, Winter, 8–22.
